A Nash Game Approach to Mixed H2/H Model Predictive Control: Part 3 – Output Feedback Case

  • Pakkiriswamy Aadaleesan
  • Prabirkumar SahaEmail author
Research Article


In this paper, the state-feedback Nash game based mixed H2/H design[1, 2] has been extended for output feedback case. The algorithm is applied to control bioreactor system with a Laguerre-Wavelet Network (LWN)[3, 4] model of the bioreactor. This is achieved by using the LWN model as a deviation model and by successively linearising the deviation model along the state trajectory. For reducing the approximation error and to improve the controller performance, symbolic derivation algorithm, viz., automatic differentiation is employed. A cautionary note is also given on the fragility of the output feedback mixed H2/H model predictive controller[4, 5] due to its sensitivity to its own parametric changes.


Robust model predictive control mixed H2/H control Nash game output feedback model predictive control (MPC) automatic differentiation fragility of controller 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Pakkiriswamy Aadaleesan and Prabirkumar Saha. A Nash game approach to mixed H 2/H model predictive control: Part 1 – State feedback linear system. International Journal of Dynamics and Control, D01:10.1007/s40435-016-0261-y, to be published.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Pakkiriswamy Aadaleesan and Prabirkumar Saha. A Nash game approach to mixed H 2/H model predictive control: Part 2 – Stability and Robustness. International Journal of Dynamics and Control, DOI: 10.1007/s40435-016-0259-5, to be pulbished.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    P. Aadaleesan, N. Miglani, R. Sharma, P. Saha. Nonlinear system identification using Wiener type Laguerre-Wavelet network model. Chemical Engineering Science, vol.63, no. 15, pp. 3932–3941, 2008.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    P. Aadaleesan. Nash game based mixed H 2/H model predictive control applied with Laguerre-Wavelet network model, Ph.D. dissertation, IIT Guwahati, India, 2011.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Pakkirisamy, P. Saha. Output feedback mixed H 2/H model predictive control: Observer based approach. In Proceedings of Annual Meeting of American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Salt Lake City, USA, 2010.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Q. Mayne, S. V. Rakovic, R. Findeisen, F. Allgower. Robust output feedback model predictive control of constrained linear systems. Automatica, vol. 42, no. 7, pp.1217–1222, 2006.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    H. L. Trentelman, A. A. Stoorvogel. Sampled-data and discrete-time H2 optimal control. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 834–862, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    W. H. Zhang, Y. L. Huang, L. H. Xie. Infinite horizon stochastic H 2/H control for discrete-time systems with state and disturbance dependent noise. Automatica, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 2306–2316, 2008.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    H. Seki, M. Ogawa, S. Ooyama, K. Akamatsu, M. Ohshima, W. Yang. Industrial application of a nonlinear model predictive control to polymerization reactors. Control Engineering Practice, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 819–828, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    P. Aadaleesan, P. Saha. Nonlinear system identification using Laguerre wavelet models. Chemical Product and Process Modeling, vol. 3, no. 2, Article number 3, 2008.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Griewank. Evaluating Derivatives: Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation, Philadelphia, USA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2000.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. A. Forth. User guide for MAD-A MATLAB Automatic Differentiation Toolbox, Applied Mathematics and Operational Research Report AMOR 2001/5, Cranfield University, Swindon, SN6 8LA, UK, June 2001.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    L. F. Shampine. Accurate numerical derivatives in MATLAB. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol. 33, no. 4, Article number 26, 2007.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. A. Henson, D. E. Seborg. Nonlinear control strategies for continuous fermenters. Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 821–835, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    P. Saha, S. H. Krishnan, V. S. R. Rao, S. C. Patwardhan. Modeling and predictive control of MIMO nonlinear systems using Wiener-Laguerre models. Chemical Engineering Communications, vol. 191, no. 8, pp. 1083–1119, 2004.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    P. Saha. Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Chemical Processes Using Laguerre Models, Ph. D. dissertation, IIT Madras, India, 1999.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    B. Ding, B. Huang. Output feedback model predictive control for nonlinear systems represented by hammersteinwiener model. IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 1302–1310, 2007.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology GuwahatiAssamIndia

Personalised recommendations