Advertisement

Low carbon storage of woody debris in a karst forest in southwestern China

  • Yangyang Wu
  • Libin Liu
  • Chunzi Guo
  • Zhonghua Zhang
  • Gang Hu
  • Jian NiEmail author
Original Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

The properties of woody debris (WD) vary across different forests under various soil conditions. Owing to the relatively shallow and low amounts of soils on karst terrains, it is necessary to determine the WD carbon inventory of karst forests. In this study, we recorded WD with a basal diameter for standing snags and the large-end diameter for fallen logs of ≥ 1 cm. The carbon density of WD in a secondary karst mixed evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved forest that had been clear-cut 55 years ago in southwestern China were inventoried in a 2 ha plot. Woody debris carbon density calculated using specific gravity and carbon concentration was 4.07 Mg C ha−1. Woody debris with diameters ≥ 10 cm (coarse WD) constituted 53.8% of total carbon storage whereas WD < 10 cm in diameters (fine WD) accounted for more pieces of WD (89.9%). Lithocarpus confinis contributed the most WD carbon (26.5%). Intermediate decayed WD was relatively more abundant, but WD with final decay contributed the least to the total pieces of WD (6.7%). The contribution of WD to carbon storage of karst forest was low compared to other forests worldwide. Significant positive correlations were found between WD carbon and biodiversity (R2 = 0.035, p < 0.01) and elevation (R2 = 0.047, p < 0.01) and negative correlations was found in outcrop coverage (R2 = 0.034, p < 0.01). Further studies are needed to elucidate the ecological functions of WD to better understand their roles in maintaining biodiversity, enhancing productivity, and controlling vegetation degradation in karst forest ecosystems.

Keywords

Secondary forest Fine woody debris Coarse woody debris Dead wood Karst Subtropical China 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870462), National Key Research & Development Program of China (2016YFC0502304 and 2016YFC0502101).

Supplementary material

11631_2019_339_MOESM1_ESM.docx (920 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 920 kb)

References

  1. Baker TR, Coronado ENH, Phillips OL, Martin J, van der Heijden GMF, Garcia M, Espejo JS (2007) Low stocks of coarse woody debris in a southwest Amazonian forest. Oecologia 152:495–504.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0667-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldock JA, Nelson PN (1999) Soil organic matter. In: Sumner ME (ed) Handbook of soil science. CRC Press, New York, pp 25–84Google Scholar
  3. Brais S, Sadi F, Bergeron Y, Grenier Y (2005) Coarse woody debris dynamics in a post-fire jack pine chronosequence and its relation with site productivity. For Ecol Manag 220(1–3):216–226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carmona MR, Armesto JJ, Aravena JC, Perez CA (2002) Coarse woody debris biomass in successional and primary temperate forests in Chiloé Island, Chile. For Ecol Manag 164:265–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00602-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chambers JQ, Higuchi N, Schimel JP, Ferreira LV, Melack JM (2000) Decomposition and carbon cycling of dead trees in tropical forests of the Central Amazon. Oecologia 122(3):380–388.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chave J, Condit R, Aguilar S, Hernandez A, Lao S, Perez R (2004) Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359(1443):409–420.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen QH (1982–2004) Flora Guizhouensis. Guizhou Science and Technology Publishing House, Guiyang. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Chen H, Harmon ME (1992) Dynamic study of coarse woody debris in temperate forest ecosystems. Chin J Appl Ecol 3(2):99–104 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  9. Christensen M, Hahn K, Mountford EP, Ódor P, Standovár T, Rozenbergar D, Diaci J, Wijdeven S, Meyer P, Winter S, Vrska T (2005) Dead wood in European beech (fagus sylvatica) forest reserves. For Ecol Manag 210(1–3):267–282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Condit R (1998) Tropical forest census plots: methods and results from Barro Colorado Island, Panama and comparison with other plots. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawford RH, Li CY, Floyd M (1997) Nitrogen fixation in root-colonized large woody residue of Oregon coastal forests. For Ecol Manag 92:229–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03923-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delaney M, Brown S, Lugo AE, Torres-Lezama A, Quintero NB (1998) The quantity and turnover of dead wood in permanent forest plots in six life zones of Venezuela. Biotropica 30:2–11.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.1998.tb00364.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystem. Science 263:185–190.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.263.5144.185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Editorial Committee for Vegetation of China (ECVC) (1980) Vegetation of China. Science Press, Beijing, p 1375 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  15. Figueiredo Filho A, Machado SA, Carneiro MRA (2000) Testing accuracy of log volume calculation procedures against water displacement techniques (xylometer). Can J For Res 30(6):990–997.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-30-6-990 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gale N (2000) The aftermath of tree death: coarse woody debris and the topography in four tropical rain forests. Can J For Res 30(9):1489–1493.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x00-071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harmon ME, Sexton J (1996). Guidelines for measurements of woody detritus in forest ecosystems. US Long-Term Ecological Research Network Office, University of Washington. Washington Publication, Seattle, p 73Google Scholar
  18. Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack KJ, Cummins KW (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 15:133–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(03)34002-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harmon ME, Caldwell BA, Sexton J, Caldwell BA, Carpenter SE (1994) Fungal sporocarp mediated losses of Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, N, P, and Zn from conifer logs in the early stages of decomposition. Can J For Res 24:1883–1893.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x94-243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harmon ME, Whigham DF, Sexton J, Olmsted I (1995) Decomposition and mass of woody detritus in the dry tropical forests of the Northeastern Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Biotropica 27:305–316.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2388916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiang ZC, Lian YQ, Qin XQ (2014) Rocky desertification in Southwest China: impacts, causes, and restoration. Earth Sci Rev 132:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kruys N, Jonsson BG (1999) Fine woody debris is important for species richness on logs in managed boreal spruce forests of Northern Sweden. Can J For Res 29:1259–1299.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x99-106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li LH, Xing XR, Huang DM, Liu CD, He JY (1996) Storage and dynamics of coarse woody debris in Castanopsis eyrei forest of Wuyi Mountain, with some considerations for its ecological effects. Acta Phytoecolocica Sinica 20:132–143 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  24. Liu CC, Wei YF, Liu YG, Guo K (2009) Biomass of canopy and shrub layers of Karst forest in Puding, Guizhou, China. Chin J Plant Ecol 33:698–705.  https://doi.org/10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.04.008 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  25. Liu YG, Liu CC, Wang SJ, Guo K, Yang J, Zhang XS, Li GQ (2013) Organic carbon storage in four ecosystem types in the karst region of southwestern China. PLoS ONE 8:e56443.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu LB, Wu YY, Hu G, Zhang ZH, Cheng AY, Wang SJ, Ni J (2016) Biomass of karst evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved mixed forest in central Guizhou province, southwestern China: a comprehensive inventory of a 2 ha plot. Silva Fennica.  https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1492 Google Scholar
  27. Luo DH, Xia J, Yuan JW, Zhang ZH, Zhu JD, Ni J (2010) Root biomass of karst vegetation in a mountainous area of southwestern China. Chin J Plant Ecol 34:611–618.  https://doi.org/10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.015 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  28. Martikainen P, Siitonen J, Kaila L, Punttila P, Rauh J (1999) Bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) and associated beetle species in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. For Ecol Manag 116:233–245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00462-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muller RN (2003) Landscape patterns of change in coarse woody debris accumulation in an old-growth deciduous forest on the Cumberland Plateau, southeastern Kentucky. Can J For Res 33:763–769.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x02-210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muller RN, Liu Y (1991) Coarse woody debris in an old growth deciduous forest on the Cumberland Plateau, southeastern Kentucky. Can J For Res 21:1567–1572.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x91-218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ni J, Luo DH, Xia J, Zhang ZH, Hu G (2015) Vegetation in karst terrain of southwestern china allocates more biomass to roots. Solid Earth 6:799–810.  https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-799-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pan YD, Birdsey RA, Fang JY, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA, Phillips OL, Shvidenko A, Lewis SL, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Jackson RB, Pacala SW, McGuire AD, Piao SL, Rautiainen A, Sitch S, Hayes D (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333:988–993.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Šamonil P, Král K, Hort L (2010) The role of tree uprooting in soil formation: a critical literature review. Geoderma 157(3):65–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.03.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scheu S, Schulz E (1996) Secondary succession, soil formation and development of a diverse community of oribatids and saprophagous soil macro-invertebrates. Biodivers Conserv 5(2):235–250.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055833 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sollins P (1982) Input and decay of coarse woody debris in coniferous stands in western Oregon and Washington. Can J For Res 12:18–28.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x82-003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spies TA, Franklin JF, Thomas TB (1988) Coarse woody debris in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon and Washington. Ecology 69:1689–1702.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1941147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ståhl G, Ringvall A, Fridman J (2001) Assessment of coarse woody debris: a methodological overview. Ecol Bull 49:57–70.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20113264 Google Scholar
  38. Sturges HA (1926) The choice of a class interval. J Am Stat Assoc 21(153):65–66.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1926.10502161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sturtevant BR, Bissonette JA, Long JN, Roberts DW (1997) Coarse woody debris as a function of age, stand structure, and disturbance in boreal Newfoundland. Ecol Appl 7:702–712.  https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007%5b0702:CWDAAF%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tang XL, Zhou GY (2005) Coarse woody debris biomass and its potential contribution to the carbon cycle in successional subtropical forests of southern China. Chin J Plant Ecol 29:559–568.  https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2005.04.006 (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tu YL, Yang J (1995) Study on biomass of the karst scrub communities in central region of Guizhou Province. Carsologica Sinica 14:199–208 [in Chinese] Google Scholar
  42. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang SJ, Ji HB, Ouyang ZY, Zhou DQ, Zheng LP, Li TY (1999) Preliminary study on weathering and pedogenesis of carbonate rock. Sci China 42:572–581.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02877784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang SJ, Zhang XB, Bai XY (2013) Discussion on nomenclature of the karst desertification regions and illustration for their environment characteristics in southwest China. J Mt Sci 31:18–24.  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2013.01.003 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  45. Webster CR, Jenkins MA (2005) Coarse woody debris dynamics in the southern Appalachians as affected by topographic position and anthropogenic disturbance history. For Ecol Manag 217:319–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weedon JT, Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Zanne AE, Wirth C, Coomes DA (2009) Global meta-analysis of wood decomposition rates: a role for trait variation among tree species. Ecol Lett 12:45–56.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01259.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Woodall CW, Liknes GC (2008) Climatic regions as an indicator of forest coarse and fine woody debris carbon stocks in the United States. Carbon Balance Manag 3:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-3-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Woodall CW, Nagel LM (2006) Coarse woody type: a new method for analyzing coarse woody debris and forest change. For Ecol Manag 227:115–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.02.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang LP, Liu WY, Yang GP, Ma WZ, Li DW (2007) Composition and carbon storage of woody debris in moist evergreen broad-leaved forest and its secondary forests in Ailao Mountains of Yunnan Province. Chin J Appl Ecol 18:2153–2159.  https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.2007.0376 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  50. Yang Q, Zhang F, Jiang Z, Li W, Zhang J, Zeng F, Li H (2014) Relationship between soil depth and terrain attributes in karst region in southwest china. J Soils Sediments 14(9):1568–1576.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0904-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zeng ZQ, Wang SL, Zhang CM, Wu ZJ, Li XQ, Luo J (2014) Carbon storage of woody debris of evergreen broad-leaf forests in mid-subtropical region of China at three succession stages. Forest Resources Management 2:66–72.  https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2014.02.013 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  52. Zhu SQ, Wei LM, Chen ZR, Zhang CG (1995) A preliminary study on biomass components of karst forest in Maolan of Guizhou Province, China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica 19:358–367.  https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.1995.04.011 (in Chinese) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press and Institute of Geochemistry, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of GeochemistryChinese Academy of SciencesGuiyangChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Puding Karst Ecosystem Research StationChinese Academy of SciencesAnshunChina
  4. 4.College of Chemistry and Life SciencesZhejiang Normal UniversityJinhuaChina
  5. 5.Haihe River Water Resources Protection Bureau, Haihe River Water Conservancy CommissionThe Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of ChinaTianjinChina
  6. 6.School of Enviroment and Life ScienceGuangxi Teachers Education UniversityNanningChina
  7. 7.Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu GulfMinistry of EducationNanningChina

Personalised recommendations