Advertisement

The enhanced element enrichment in the supercritical states of granite–pegmatite systems

  • Rainer Thomas
  • Paul DavidsonEmail author
  • Karen Appel
Original Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we show that supercritical fluids have a greater significance in the generation of pegmatites, and for ore-forming processes related to granites than is usually assumed. We show that the supercritical melt or fluid is a silicate phase in which volatiles; principally H2O are completely miscible in all proportions at magmatic temperatures and pressures. This phase evolves from felsic melts and changes into hydrothermal fluids, and its unique properties are particularly important in sequestering and concentrating low abundance elements, such as metals. In our past research, we have focused on processes observed at upper crustal levels, however extensive work by us and other researchers have demonstrated that supercritical melt/fluids should be abundant in melting zones at deep-crustal levels too. We propose that these fluids may provide a connecting link between lower and upper crustal magmas, and a highly efficient transport mechanism for usually melt incompatible elements. In this paper, we explore the unique features of this fluid which allow the partitioning of various elements and compounds, potentially up to extreme levels, and may explain various features both of mineralization and the magmas that produced them.

Keywords

Granites Pegmatites Supercritical state Extreme element enrichment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to take this opportunity to dedicate this paper to Dr. James Webster, with our thanks and gratitude for his unflagging assistance, collaboration and encouragement over the years. Over a long period, Dr. Webster has worked with us unravelling the mysteries of melt–melt immiscibility, in addition to the enormous body of work he has achieved in other areas of geology and geochemistry. We thank Prof. Huaiwei Ni for valuable suggestions and the hint to some important references.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11631_2019_319_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (81 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 80 kb)
11631_2019_319_MOESM2_ESM.pptx (195 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PPTX 194 kb)
11631_2019_319_MOESM3_ESM.docx (11 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 10 kb)

References

  1. Audétat A, Keppler H (2004) Viscosity of fluids in subduction zones. Science 303:513–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audétat A, Li W (2017) The genesis of climax-type porphyry Mo deposits: insight from fluid inclusions and melt inclusions. Ore Geol Rev 88:436–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audétat A, Pettke T (2003) The magmatic-hydrothermal evolution of two barren granites: a melt and fluid inclusion study of the Rito del Medio and Canada Pinabete Plutons in northern New Mexico (USA). Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67:97–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolmatov D, Brazhkin VV, Trachenko K (2013) Thermodynamic behaviour of supercritical matter. Nat Commun 4:2331.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borisova AY, Thomas R, Salvi S, Candaudap F, Lanzanova A, Chemleff J (2012) Tin and associated metal and metalloid geochemistry by femtosecond LA-ICP-QMS microanalysis of pegmatite-leucogranite melt and fluid inclusions: new evidence for melt-melt-fluid immiscibility. Mineral Mag 76:91–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bureau H, Keppler H (1999) Complete miscibility between silicate melts and hydrous fluids in the upper mantle: experimental evidence and geochemical implications. Earth Planet Sci Lett 165:187–196 (35)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bureau H, Ménez B, Malavergne V, Somogyi A, Simionovici A, Massare D, Khodja H, Daudin L, Gallien J-P, Shaw C, Bonnin-Mosbah M (2007) In situ mapping of high-pressure fluids using hydrothermal diamond anvil cells. High Press Res Int J 27(2):235–247.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08957950701384572 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Candela PA (1997) A review of shallow, ore-related granites: textures, volatiles, and ore metals. J Pet 38:1619–1633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carten RB, Geraghty EP, Walker BM, Shannon JR (1988) Cyclic development of igneous features and their relationship to high-temperature hydrothermal features in the Henderson porphyry molybdenum deposit, Colorado. Econ Geol 83:266–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cloos M (2001) Bubbling magma chambers, cupolas, and porphyry copper deposits. Int Geol Rev 43(4):285–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Core DP, Kesler SE, Essene EJ (2006) Unusually Cu-rich magmas associated with giant porphyry copper deposits: evidence from Bingham. Utah Geol 34(1):41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dietrich A, Lehmann B, Wallianos A (2000) Bulk rock and melt inclusion geochemistry of Bolivian tin porphyry systems. Econ Geol 95:33–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goranson RW (1931) The solubility of water in granite magmas. Am J Sci 22:481–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gorbaty YE, Bondarenko GV (1998) The physical state of supercritical fluids. J Supercrit Fluids 14:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hollas MJ (1996) Modern spectroscopy, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 30–34. ISBN: 0471965227Google Scholar
  16. Kamenetsky VS, van Achterbergh E, Ryan CG, Naumov VB, Mernagh TP, Davidson P (2002) Extreme chemical heterogeneity of granite-derived hydrothermal fluids: an example from inclusions in a single crystal of miarolitic quartz. Geology 30:459–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kawamoto T, Mibe K, Bureau H, Reguer S, Mocuta C, Kubsky S, Thiaudière D, Ono S, Kogiso T (2014) Large-ion lithophile elements delivered by saline fluids to the sub-arc mantle. Earth Planets Space 66:61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Korzhinsky MA, Tkachenko SI, Shmulovich KI, Taran YA, Steinberg GS (1994) Discovery of a pure rhenium mineral at Kudriavy volcano. Nature 369(6475):51–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. London D, Evensen JM (2002) Beryllium in silicic magmas and the origin of beryl-bearing pegmatites In: Grew ES (ed) Beryllium: mineralogy, petrology, and geochemistry. Rev Miner Geochem 50:445–486Google Scholar
  20. Manning CE (1994) The solubility of quartz in H2O in the lower crust and upper mantle. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58(22):4831–4839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Manning CE (2004) The chemistry of subduction-zone fluids. Earth Planet Sci Lett 223:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manning CE (2006) What’s so super about supercritical fluids in subduction zones? Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70(18):A38Google Scholar
  23. Michal J (1973) Inorganic chromatographic analysis. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Müller A, Husdal T, Sunde Ø, Friis H, Andersen T, Johansen TS, Werner R, Thoresen Ø, Olerud S (2017) Norwegian Pegmatites I: Tysfjord-Hamarøy, Evje-Iveland, Langesundsfjord. Excursion Guide NGF Series 2017-6Google Scholar
  25. Mutschler FE, Wright EG, Ludington S, Abbott JT (1981) Granite molybdenite systems. Econ Geol 76:874–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mysen B (2014) Water-melt interaction in hydrous magmatic systems at high temperature and pressure. Prog Earth Planet Sci 1:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ni H, Zhang L, Xiong X, Mao Z, Wang J (2017) Supercritical fluids at subduction zones: evidence, formation condition, and physicochemical properties. Earth Sci Rev 167:62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peach G (1981) Theory of the pressure broadening and shift of spectral lines. Adv Phys 30(3):367–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peretyazhko IS, Smirnov SZ, Thomas VG, Zagorsky VY (2004) Gels and melt-like gels in high-temperature endogeneous mineral formation. In: Proceedings of the interim IAGOD conference Vladivistok/Russia, Vladivostok Dalnauka, pp 306–309Google Scholar
  30. Pioro I, Mokry S (2011) Thermophysical properties at critical and supercritical pressures. In: Belmiloudi A (ed) Heat transfer—theoretical analysis, experimental investigations and industrial systems. InTec, RijekaGoogle Scholar
  31. Rickers K, Thomas R, Heinrich W (2004) Trace element analysis of individual synthetic and natural fluid inclusions with synchrotron radiation XRF using Monte Carlo simulation for quantification. Eur J Mineral 16:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rickers K, Thomas R, Heinrich W (2006) The chemical evolution of a water-, B- and F-rich granite-pegmatite system related to a Sn-W mineralization: a melt/fluid inclusion study. Miner Depos 41:229–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rösler HJ, Lange H (1975) Geochemische Tabellen. VEB Deutscher Verlag, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmidt C, Wohlers A, Marquardt K, Watenphul A (2014) Experimental study on the pseudobinary H2O + NaAlSi3O8 at 600–800 °C and 0.3–2.4 GPa. Chem Geol 388:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shinohara H, Kazahaya K, Lowenstern JB (1995) Volatile transport in a convecting magma column: implications for porphyry Mo mineralisation. Geology 23(12):1091–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smirnov SZ (2015) The fluid regime during the magmatic evolution of rare-metal, fluorine- and boron-rich granite-pegmatite systems: petrogenetic conclusions. DSc Dissertation, Novosibirsk (in Russian)Google Scholar
  37. Smith FG (1948) Transport and deposition of the non-sulphide vein minerals. III, Phase relations at the pegmatite stage. Econ Geol 43:535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sowerby J, Keppler H (2002) The effect of fluorine, boron and excess sodium on the critical curve in the albite-H2O system. Contrib Miner Pet 143:32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomas R, Davidson P (2010) Hambergite-rich melt inclusions in morganite crystals from the Muiane pegmatite, Mozambique and some remarks on the paragenesis of hambergite. Mineral Pet 100:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thomas R, Davidson P (2013) The missing link between granites and granitic pegmatites. J Geosci 58:183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomas R, Davidson P (2016a) Revisiting complete miscibility between silicate melts and hydrous fluids, and the extreme enrichment of some elements in the supercritical state—consequences for the formation of pegmatites and ore deposits. Ore Geol Rev 72:1088–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thomas R, Davidson P (2016b) Origin of miarolitic pegmatites in the Königshain granite/Lusatia. Lithos 260:225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thomas R, Davidson P, Beurlen H (2012) The competing models for the origin and internal evolution of granitic pegmatites in the light of melt and fluid inclusion research. Mineral Pet 106:55–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thomas R, Webster JD, Heinrich W (2000) Melt inclusions in pegmatite quartz: complete miscibility between silicate melts and hydrous fluids at low pressure. Contrib Miner Pet 139:394–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thomas R, Förster H-J, Rickers K, Webster JD (2005) Formation of extremely F-rich hydrous melt fractions and hydrothermal fluids during differentiation of highly evolved tin-granite magmas: a melt/fluid-inclusion study. Contrib Miner Pet 148:582–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomas R, Rericha A, Pohl WL, Davidson P (2018) Genetic significance of the 867 cm−1 out-of-plane Raman mode in graphite associated with V-bearing green grossular. Mineral Pet.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-018-0563-1 Google Scholar
  47. Veksler IV, Thomas R, Schmidt C (2002) Experimental evidence of three coexisting immiscible fluids in synthetic granitic pegmatite. Am Miner 87:775–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vogel R (1959) Die heterogenen Gleichgewichte. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  49. Webster JD, Thomas R, Rhede D, Förster H-J, Seltmann R (1997) Melt inclusions in quartz from evolved peraluminous pegmatite: geochemical evidence for strong tin enrichment in fluorine-rich and phosphorus-rich residual liquids. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61:2589–2604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilkinson JJ, Nolan J, Rankin AH (1996) Silicothermal fluid; a novel medium for mass transport in the lithosphere. Geology 24(12):1059–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press and Institute of Geochemistry, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section 3.6. Chemistry and Physics of Earth MaterialsHelmholtz-Centre Potsdam, German Research Centre for Geoscience – GFZPotsdamGermany
  2. 2.CODES, Centre for Ore Deposit and Earth Sciences, School of Natural SciencesUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  3. 3.High Energy Density scientific instrumentEuropean X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Facility GmbHSchenefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations