Numerical Investigation on Porous Media Quenching Behaviors of Premixed Deflagrating Flame using RANS/LES Model

  • Xiaoping WenEmail author
  • Tengfei Su
  • Zhigang Liu
  • Maozhao Xie
  • Fahui Wang
  • Zhichao Liu


To understand the mechanism of premixed flame quenching by porous media, a zonal hybrid RANS/LES model was employed, in which the LES flow solver was used to resolve the large turbulent structures within the non-porous region, while RANS was applied to porous media zone. The predicted results were compared with previous experimental data. And it was evident that the premixed flame propagation rates and structure as well as quenching behaviors were reproduced by this numerical approach with a better accuracy. Due to the inherently higher heat transfer coefficients between the solid and gas phases in porous media, the gas phase temperature has been decreased rapidly. However, upstream obstacles can cause the flame propagating faster and thus reduce the axial gas temperature gradients, resulting in the invalidity of the operation of premixed flame quenching. By comparison with the case without upstream obstacle, the values of reaction rate attained in the case with three pairs of obstacles are higher, which makes a positive impact on the flame passing through the porous medium. In addition, the porous media with greater pore density has an excellent flame quenching property mainly owing to both the larger volumetric heat transfer and higher quenching temperature.


RANS/LES model porous media quenching flame propagation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51174115, 51604095), the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Henan Province of China (No. 14A410007) and the research fund of Henan Key Laboratory for Green and Efficient Mining & Comprehensive Utilization of Mineral Resources.


  1. [1]
    Cao X., Ren J., Zhou Y., et al., Suppression of methane/air explosion by ultrafine water mist containing sodium chloride additive. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 285: 311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Shao H., Jiang S., Wu Z., et al., Influence of diaphragm thickness on gas explosion suppression by vacuum chamber. Powder Technology, 2016, 295: 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Zarko V.E., Weiser V., Eisenreich N., et al., Prevention of hazardous fires and explosions. Nato Science, 1999, 26: 199–213.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Oliveira A.A.M., Kaviany M., Nonequilibrium in the transport of heat and reactants in combustion in porous media. Progress in Energy & Combustion Science, 2001, 27: 523–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Spalding D.B., A theory of inflammability limits and flame-quenching. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1957, 240: 83–100.ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Howell J.R., Hall M.J., Ellzey J.L., Combustion of hydrocarbon fuels within porous inert media. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1996, 22: 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Ciccarelli G., Johansen C., Parravani M., Transition in the propagation mechanism during flame acceleration in porous media. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33: 2273–2278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Joo H.I., Duncan K., Ciccarelli G., Flame-quenching performance of ceramic foam. Combustion Science and Technology, 2006, 178: 1755–1769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Nie B., He X., Zhang R., et al., The roles of foam ceramics in suppression of gas explosion overpressure and quenching of flame propagation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 192: 741–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Ibrahim S.S., Hargrave G.K., Williams T.C., Experimental investigation of flame/solid interactions in turbulent premixed combustion. Experimental Thermal & Fluid Science, 2001, 24: 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Park D.J., Lee Y.S., Green A.R., Prediction for vented explosions in chambers with multiple obstacles. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 155: 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Ciccarelli G., Johansen C.T., Parravani M., The role of shock—flame interactions on flame acceleration in an obstacle laden channel. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157: 2125–2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Gubba S.R., Ibrahim S.S., Malalasekera W., et al., Measurements and LES calculations of turbulent premixed flame propagation past repeated obstacles. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158: 2465–2481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Wen X., Yu M., Liu Z., et al., Large eddy simulation of methane.air deflagration in an obstructed chamber using different combustion models. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2012, 25: 730–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Wen X., Yu M., Liu Z., Li G., Ji W., Xie M., Effects of cross-wise obstacle position on methane-air deflagration characteristics. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26: 1335–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Di Sarli V., Di Benedetto A., Russo G., Large eddy simulation of transient premixed flame.vortex interactions in gas explosions. Chemical Engineering Science, 2012, 71: 539–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Yu M., Zheng K., Zheng L., et al., Scale effects on premixed flame propagation of hydrogen/methane deflagration. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(38): 13121–13133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Yu M., Zheng K., Chu T., Gas explosion flame propagation over various hollow-square obstacles. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 30: 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Bang B.H., Ahn C.S., Lee J.G., et al., Theoretical, numerical, and experimental investigation of pressure rise due to deflagration in confined spaces. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2017, 120: 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Wen X., Xie M., Yu M., et al., Porous media quenching behaviors of gas deflagration in the presence of obstacles. Experimental Thermal & Fluid Science, 2013, 50: 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Mare L.D., Mihalik T.A., Continillo G., et al., Experimental and numerical study of flammability limits of gaseous mixtures in porous media. Experimental Thermal & Fluid Science, 2000, 21: 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Edwards K.L., Norris M.J., Materials and constructions used in devices to prevent the spread of flames in pipelines and vessels. Materials & Design, 1999, 20: 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Narin B., Ozyörük Y., Ulas A., Two dimensional numerical prediction of deflagration-to-detonation transition in porous energetic materials. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 273: 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Williams F.A., Combustion theory, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, 1985.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Mathey F., Computation of trailing-edge noise using a zonal RANS-LES approach and acoustic analogy. Proceedings of the Conference on Turbulence and Interactions TI2006, Porquerolles, France, 2006.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Johansen C., Ciccarelli G., Modeling the initial flame acceleration in an obstructed channel using large eddy simulation. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(4): 571–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Sarli V.D., Benedetto A.D., Russo G., Using large eddy simulation for understanding vented gas explosions in the presence of obstacles. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 169: 435–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Liu Q., Zhang Y., Fang N., et al., Study on the flame propagation and gas explosion in propane/air mixtures. Fuel, 2015, 140: 677–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Fabrice C., Charles M., Denis V., A power-law flame wrinkling model for LES of premixed turbulent combustion Part I: non-dynamic formulation and initial tests. Combustion and Flame, 2002, 131: 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Shi J.R., Xie M.Z., Liu H., et al., Two-dimensional numerical study of combustion and heat transfer in porous media combustor-heater. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33: 3309–3316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Younis L.B., Viskanta R., Experimental determination of the volumetric heat transfer coefficient between stream of air and ceramic foam. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer, 1993, 36: 1425–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Jones W.P., Launder B.E., The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1972, 15: 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Westbrook C.K., Dryer F.L., Simplified reaction mechanisms for the oxidation of hydrocarbon fuels in flames. Combustion Science & Technology, 1981, 27: 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Molkov V.V., Makarov D.V., Schneider H., Hydrogen-air deflagrations in open atmosphere: Large eddy simulation analysis of experimental data. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32: 2198–2205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Hall R., Masri A.R., Yaroshchyk P., et al., Effects of position and frequency of obstacles on turbulent premixed propagating flames. Combustion and Flame, 2009, 156: 439–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Lee T.S., Sung J.Y., Park D.J., Experimental investigations on the deflagration explosion characteristics of different DME-LPG mixtures. Fire Safety Journal, 2012, 49: 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Fu X., Viskanta R., Gore J.P., Measurement and correlation of volumetric heat transfer coefficients of cellular ceramics. Experimental Thermal & Fluid Science, 1998, 17: 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Mihalik T.A., Lee J.H., Continillo G., et al., Quenching mechanisms of gaseous hydrocarbon-air flames in packed beds. Proceedings of the 18th International Colloquium on the Dynamics of Explosions and Reactive Systems, Seattle, US, 2001.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Thomas G.O., The quenching of laminar methane-air flames by water mists. Combustion and Flame, 2002, 130: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoping Wen
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Tengfei Su
    • 1
  • Zhigang Liu
    • 3
  • Maozhao Xie
    • 4
  • Fahui Wang
    • 1
  • Zhichao Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Power EngineeringHenan Polytechnic UniversityJiaozuoChina
  2. 2.Henan Key Laboratory for Green and Efficient Mining & Comprehensive Utilization of Mineral ResourcesHenan Polytechnic UniversityJiaozuoChina
  3. 3.The Boiler & Pressure Vessel Safety Inspection Institute of Henan ProvinceJiaozuoChina
  4. 4.School of Energy and Power EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations