Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 16, Issue 9, pp 2028–2038 | Cite as

Fractal characterization of sediment particle size distribution in the water-level fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China

  • Jin-lin Li
  • Yu-hai BaoEmail author
  • Jie Wei
  • Xiu-bin HeEmail author
  • Qiang Tang
  • Jean de Dieu Nambajimana
Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

The combined effect of periodic water impoundment and seasonal natural flood events has created a 30 m high water-level fluctuation zone (WLFZ) around the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR), China, forming a unique eco-landscape. Siltation, eutrophication, enrichment of heavy metals, and methane emissions in the WLFZ have been widely associated with sediment and soil particles generated from the upstream catchment or upland slopes. However, little attention has been paid to the complexity of sediment particle-size distributions in the WLFZ. In the present study, core samples (from a 345 cm thick sediment core from the base of the WLFZ), slope transect surface samples (across/up a WLFZ slope), and along-river/longitudinal surface samples (from the reservoir reaches) were collected. Laser granulometry and a volume-based fractal model were used to reveal the characteristics of sediment particle-size distributions. Results indicate that the alternation of coarse and fine particles in the sedimentary core profile is represented as a fluctuation of low and high values of fractal dimension (D), ranging from 2.59 to 2.77. On the WLFZ slope transect, surface sediment particles coarsen with increasing elevation, sand content increases from 3.3% to 78.5%, and D decreases from 2.76 to 2.53. Longitudinally, surface sediments demonstrate a downstream-fining trend, and D increases gradually downstream. D is significantly positively correlated with the fine particle content. We conclude that D is a useful measure for evaluating sediment particle-size distribution.

Keywords

Spatial differentiation Sediment particle Fractal dimension Water level fluctuation zone Three Gorges Reservoir 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 41771320, 41771321, and 41571278), the Opening Project of Chongqing Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Environmental Remote Sensing in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (Grant no. DBGC201801), and the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (Grant no. 2018SZ0132). We thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments that improved the quality of this paper and are grateful to Ms. Yan Dandan for her help with the laboratory analyses.

References

  1. Bao YH, Gao P, He XB (2015) The water-level fluctuation zone of Three Gorges Reservoir — A unique geomorphological unit. Earth-Science Reviews 150: 14–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bao YH, He XB, Wen AB, et al. (2018) Dynamic changes of soil erosion in a typical disturbance zone of China’s Three Gorges Reservoir. Catena 169: 128–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.05.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barling RD, Moore ID (1994) Role of buffer strips in management of waterway pollution: a review. Environmental Management 18: 543–558.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02400858 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bing HJ, Zhou J, Wu YH, et al. (2016). Current state, sources, and potential risk of heavy metals in sediments of Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Environmental Pollution 214: 485–496.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bittelli M, Campbell GS, Flury M (1999) Characterization of particle-size distribution in soils with a fragmentation model. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63(4): 782–788.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.634782x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callesen I, Keck H, Andersen TJ (2018) Particle size distribution in soils and marine sediments by laser diffraction using Malvern Mastersizer 2000—method uncertainty including the effect of hydrogen peroxide pretreatment. Journal of Soils and Sediments 18(7): 2500–2510.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-1965-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen XY, Zhou J (2013) Volume-based soil particle fractal relation with soil erodibility in a small watershed of purple soil. Environmental Earth Sciences 70(4): 1735–1746.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2261-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Correll DL (2005) Principles of planning and establishment of buffer zones. Ecological Engineering 24: 433–439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawford SE, Lofts S, Liber K (2017) The role of sediment properties and solution pH in the adsorption of uranium (VI) to freshwater sediments. Environmental Pollution 220: 873–881.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cui Y, Li J, Chen AM, et al. (2019) Fractal dimensions of trapped sediment particle size distribution can reveal sediment retention ability of common plants in a dry-hot valley. Catena 180: 252–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.04.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frémion F, Bordas F, Mourier B, et al. (2016) Influence of dams on sediment continuity: A study case of a natural metallic contamination. Science of the Total Environment 547(43): 282–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedl G, Alfred W (2002). Disrupting biogeochemical cycles — Consequences of damming. Aquatic Sciences 64(1): 55–65.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-002-8054-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. González E, Felipe-Lucia MR, Bourgeois B, et al. (2017) Integrative conservation of riparian zones. Biological Conservation 211: 20–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gregory SV (1991) An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. Bioscience 41(8): 540–551.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1311607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. He XB, Bao YH, Nan HW, et al. (2009). Tillage pedogenesis of purple soils in southwestern China. Journal of Mountain Science 6(2): 205–210.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-009-1038-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hupp CR, Osterkamp WR (1996) Riparian vegetation and fluvial geomorphic processes. Geomorphology 14: 277–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(95)00042-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koiter AJ, Owens PN, Petticrew EL, et al. (2017) The role of soil surface properties on the particle size and carbon selectivity of interrill erosion in agricultural landscapes. Catena 153: 194–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.01.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahesh S, Roy RG (2009) Modeling the effects of riparian buffer zone and contour strips on stream water quality. Ecological Engineering 35: 1167–1177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mandelbrot BB (1967) How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension. Science, 155, 636–638.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.156.3775.636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mandelbrot BB (1982) The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco. p 488.  https://doi.org/10.1119/1.13295 Google Scholar
  21. Maria R, Nicolae R, Dumitriu D, et al. (2008) Downstream variation in bed sediment size along the East Carpathian rivers: evidence of the role of sediment sources. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 33(5): 674–694.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1568 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miguel ÁM, Eloísa M (2002) Laser diffraction and multifractal analysis for the characterization of dry soil volume-size distributions. Soil & Tillage Research 64: 113–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-1987(01)00249-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Naiman RJ, Décamps H (1997) The ecology of interfaces: Riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28(1): 621–658.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Omengo FO, Geeraert N, Bouillon S, et al. (2016) Sediment deposition patterns in a tropical floodplain, Tana River, Kenya. Catena 143: 57–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peng HT, Horton R, Lei TW, et al. (2015) A modified method for estimating fine and coarse fractal dimensions of soil particle size distributions based on laser diffraction analysis. Journal of Soils and Sediments 15(4): 937–948.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-1044-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perfect E, Kay BD (1995) Applications of fractals in soil and tillage research: a review. Soil & Tillage Research 36(1–2): 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(96)81397-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Piqué G, Batalla RJ, López R, et al. (2017) The fluvial sediment budget of a dammed river (upper Muga, southern Pyrenees). Geomorphology 293: 211–226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.05.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Qi F, Zhang RH, Liu X, et al. (2018) Soil particle size distribution characteristics of different land-use types in the Funiu mountainous region. Soil & Tillage Research 184: 45–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sabo JL, Sponseller R, Dixon M, et al. (2005) Riparian zones increase regional species richness by harboring different, not more, species. Ecology 86(1): 56–62.  https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0668 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Salemi LF, Groppo JD, Trevisan R, et al. (2012) Riparian vegetation and water yield: A synthesis. Journal of Hydrology 454–455: 195–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shi CX, Petts G, Gurnell A (1999) Bench development along the regulated, lower River Dee, UK. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 24(2): 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steiger J, Gurnell AM (2003) Spatial hydrogeomorphological influences on sediment and nutrient deposition in riparian zones: Observations from the Garonne River, France. Geomorphology 49(1): 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00144-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steiger J, Gurnell AM, Ergenzinger P, et al. (2001) Sedimentation in the riparian zone of an incising river. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26(1): 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stromberg JC, Tiller R, Richter B (1996) Effects of groundwater decline on riparian vegetation of semiarid regions: The San Pedro, Arizona. Ecological Applications 6(1): 113–131.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2269558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Su XL, Nilsson C, Pilotto F, et al. (2017) Soil erosion and deposition in the new shorelines of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Science of the Total Environment 599–600: 1485–1492.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sun Z, Xu G, Hao T, et al. (2015) Release of heavy metals from sediment bed under wave-induced liquefaction. Marine Pollution Bulletin 97: 209–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tang Q, Bao YH, He XB, et al. (2016) Flow regulation manipulates contemporary seasonal sedimentary dynamics in the reservoir fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Science of the Total Environment 548–549: 410–420.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tang Q, Bao YH, He XB, et al. (2014) Sedimentation and associated trace metal enrichment in the riparian zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Science of the Total Environment 479–480: 258–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tang Q, Collins AL, Wen AB, et al. (2018) Particle size differentiation explains flow regulation controls on sediment sorting in the water-level fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Science of the Total Environment 633: 1114–1125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tickner DP, Angold PG, Gurnell AM, et al. (2001) Riparian plant invasions: hydrogeomorphological control and ecological impacts. Progress in Physical Geography 25(1): 22–52.  https://doi.org/10.1177/030913330102500102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tyler SW, Wheatcraft SW (1992). Fractal scaling of soil particle size distributions: analysis and limitations. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56: 362–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang BY, Yan DC (2018) Sediment sources tracing in riparian zone based on grain size distribution and 137Cs activity in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute 35(6): 146–153. (In Chinese)  https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20171063 Google Scholar
  43. Wang GL, Zhou SL, Zhao QG (2005) Volume fractal dimension of soil particles and its applications to land use. Acta Pedologica Sinica 42(4): 545–550. (In Chinese)  https://doi.org/10.11766/trxb200408030403 Google Scholar
  44. Wang YY, Wen AB, Shi ZL, et al. (2016) The sediment characteristics of riparian zone of tributaries and main stream in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 30(2): 122–125. (In Chinese)  https://doi.org/10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2016.02.022 Google Scholar
  45. Wei J, Shi BL, Li JL, et al. (2018) Shear strength of purple soil bunds under different soil water contents and dry densities: A case study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. Catena 166: 124–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.03.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xia D, Deng YS, Wang SL, et al. (2015) Fractal features of soil particle-size distribution of different weathering profiles of the collapsing gullies in the hilly granitic region, south China. Natural Hazards 79(1): 455–478.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1852-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xie DT, Fan XH, Wei CF (2007) Effects of the riparian zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir on the water-soil environment of the reservoir area. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science) 29(1): 39–47. (In Chinese)  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-9868.2007.01.009 Google Scholar
  48. Yin K, Viana PZ, Rockne KJ (2019) Organic contaminated sediments remediation with active caps: Nonlinear adsorption unveiled by combined isotherm and column transportation studies. Chemosphere 214: 710–718.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yu Y, Wei W, Cheng LD, et al. (2017) Land preparation and vegetation type jointly determine soil conditions after long-term land stabilization measures in a typical hilly catchment, Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Soils and Sediments 17(4): 144–156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1494-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yuan XZ, Zhang YW, Liu H, et al. (2013) The littoral zone in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China: challenges and opportunities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 20: 7092–7102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1404-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang D, Chen AQ, Wang XM, et al. (2016) A quantitative determination of the effect of moisture on purplemudstone decay in Southwestern China. Catena 139: 28–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhu YY, Tang WZ, Jin X, et al. (2019) Using biochar capping to reduce nitrogen release from sediments in eutrophic lakes. Science of the Total Environment 646: 93–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Mountain Surface Processes and Ecological Regulation, Institute of Mountain Hazards and EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesChengduChina
  2. 2.Chongqing Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Environmental Remote Sensing in the Three Gorges Reservoir AreaChongqingChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Sustainable Agriculture Sciences DepartmentRothamsted ResearchOkehampton, DevonUK

Personalised recommendations