Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 441–452 | Cite as

Quantitative assessment of the impact of earthquake-induced geohazards on natural landscapes in Jiuzhaigou Valley

  • Xu-dong Hu
  • Kai-heng HuEmail author
  • Xiao-peng Zhang
  • Li Wei
  • Jin-bo Tang
Article

Abstract

Many natural landscapes that lie in high mountain regions are highly susceptible to geological hazards, and their values and integrity are strongly threatened by the hazards. A preliminary framework was proposed to undertake a quantitative assessment of the impact of earthquake-induced geological hazards on the natural landscapes. Four factors reflecting the aesthetic value, ecological value, integrity of landscapes were selected to assess their vulnerability. The impact of earthquake-induced geological hazards on the landscapes is quantitatively expressed as the product of their vulnerability and resilience. The assessment framework was applied to Jiuzhaigou Valley which was severely struck by the Ms 7.0 earthquake on August 8, 2017. Field survey, satellite image interpretation, high-resolution DEM and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) reconnaissance were used to retrieve the values of the assessment factors. Twenty seven World Heritage Sites in the valley strongly influenced by the earthquakeinduced geohazards were evaluated. The impact values of two sites of them (Sparking Lake and Nuorilang Waterfall) are up to 8.24 and 4.65, respectively, and their natural landscapes were greatly damaged. The assessment results show a good agreement with the actual damages of the heritage sites.

Keywords

Natural landscapes assessment Jiuzhaigou earthquake Earthquake-induced geohazards World Heritage Sites 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by “8.8”Jiuzhaigou earthquake stricken area ecological disaster prevention and control of key scientific and technological support project of Land and Resources Department of Sichuan Province (Research on Prevention and Control Technology of Ecological Debris Flow Disasters) (Grant No.KJ- 2018-24), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41790434 and 41601011).

Supplementary material

11629_2018_5240_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (189 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 190 KB.

References

  1. Bell R, Glade T (2004) Quantitative risk analysis for landslides- Examples from Bildudalur, NW-Iceland. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 4: 117–131.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-117-2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. CENC (2017) China Earthquake Networks Center, China Earthquake Administration. https://www.cenc.ac.cn/(Accessed on 2018-08-06)Google Scholar
  3. Chen XQ, Chen JG, Cui P, et al. (2018) Assessment of prospective hazards resulting from the 2017 earthquake at the world heritage site Jiuzhaigou Valley, Sichuan, China. Journal of Mountain Science 15(4): 779–792.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4785-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chousianitis K, Gaudio VD, Sabatakakis N, et al. (2016) Assessment of earthquake-induced landslide hazard in Greece: From Arias intensity to spatial distribution of slope resistance demand. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 106(1): 174–188.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150172. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng C, Xiao Y, Ouyang ZY, et al. (2013) Natural landscape valuation of Wulingyuan Scenic Area in Zhangjiajie City. ACTA Ecologica Sinica 33(3):0771–0779. (In Chinese)  https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201203270418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen C, Hu KH (2017) Comparison of distribution of landslides triggered by Wenchuan, Lushan, and Ludian earthquakes. Journal of Engineering Geology 25(3): 806–814. (In Chinese)  https://doi.org/10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017.03.028 Google Scholar
  7. Cigna F, Tapere D, Lee K (2018) Geological hazards in the UNESCO World Heritage sites of the UK: From the global to the local scale perspective. Earth-Science Reviews 176:166–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dai LX, Xu Q, Fan XM, et al. (2017) A preliminary study on remote sensing interpretation of landslides triggered by Jiuzhaigou earthquake in Sichuan on August 8th, 2017 and their spatial distribution patterns. Journal of Engineering Geology 25(4): 1151–1163 https://doi.org/10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017.04.030(In Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. D’Andrea A, Cafiso S, Condorelli A (2005) Methodological Considerations for the Evaluation of Seismic Risk on Road Network. Pure and Applied Geophysics 162(4): 767–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng G (2012) The Formation of Jiuzhaigou Nature Reserve Tourism Geological Landscape and its Protection. Science Publisher, Beijing. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Duan YM (2008) The western China capital cities landscape characteristic aesthetic structure. Huazhong University of Science & Technology. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Fan XM, Gianvito S, Xu Q, et al. (2018) Coseismic landslides triggered by the 8th August 2017 Ms 7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake (Sichuan, China): factors controlling their spatial distribution and implications for the seismogenic blind fault identification. Landslides 15(5): 967–983.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-0960-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallina V, Torresan S, Critto A, et al. (2016) A review of multirisk methodologies for natural hazards: Consequences and challenges for a climate change impact assessment. Journal of Environment Management 186: 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gardoni P, LaFave JM (2016) Multi-hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering. Springer. pp 3–12.Google Scholar
  15. Garschagen M, Sandholz S (2018) The role of minimum supply and social vulnerability assessment for governing critical infrastructure failure: current gaps and future agenda. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 18: 1233–1246.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1233-2018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gautam D, Dong Y (2018) Multi-hazard vulnerability of structures and lifelines due to the 2015 Gorkha earthquake and 2017 central Nepal flash flood. Journal of Building Engineering 17: 196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ge WB, et al. Research Group (2009) Sustainable development of landscape water system and ecological geological environment in Jiuzhai-Huanglong core scenic spot. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Press. pp 1–25. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Guillard-Gonçalves C, Zêzere JL, Pereira S, et al. (2016) Assessment of physical vulnerability of buildings and analysis of landslide risk at the municipal scale: application to the Loures municipality, Portugal. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 16: 311–331.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-311-2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hollenstein K (2005) Reconsidering the risk assessment concept: Standardizing the impact description as a building block for vulnerability assessment. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 5: 301–307.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-301-2005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsieh SY, Lee CT (2011) Empirical estimation of the Newmark displacement from the Arias intensity and critical acceleration. Engineering Geology 122(1-2): 34–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IPCC (2012) Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, et al. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA. p 582.Google Scholar
  22. John Heinz III Center for Science (2000) Economics and the Environment: The Hidden Costs of Coastal hazards, Implications for risk assessment and mitigation. Island Press. p 219.Google Scholar
  23. Kappes MS, Papathoma—Köhle M, Keiler M (2012) Assessing physical vulnerability for multi-hazards using an indicatorbased methodology. Applied Geography 32: 577–590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu J, Wang J, Wang SH, et al. (2018) Analysis and simulation of the spatiotemporal evolution pattern of tourism lands at the Natural World Heritage Site Jiuzhaigou, China. Habitat International.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.07.005 Google Scholar
  25. Liu WB, Zhu XD, Du XM (2016) Application of geohazard risk evaluation of tourist attractions based on GLM fuzzy. Journal of Residuals Science & Technology 13(5): 1–5.Google Scholar
  26. Liu SY, Zhang XP, Zheng ZY (2007) Biodiversity of the Jiuzhaigou National Natural Reserve. Sichuan Scientific Publishing, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  27. Li YS, Chao HA, Y SJ, Wu CH (2017) Study on seismic fault and source rupture tectonic dynamic mechanism of Jiuzhaigou Ms 7.0 earthquake. Journal of Engineering Geology (4):1141–1150.  https://doi.org/10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017.04.029 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Papathoma—Köhle M, Neuhauser B, Ratzinger K, et al (2007) Elements at risk as a framework for assessing the vulnerability of communities to landslides. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 7:765–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Panahi M, Rezaie F, Meshkani SA (2014) Seismic vulnerability assessment of school buildings in Tehran city based on AHP and GIS. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 14:969–979.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-969-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pavlova I, Makarigakis A, Depret T, et al. (2017) Global overview of the geological hazard exposure and disaster risk awareness at world heritage sites. Journal of Cultural Heritage 28:151–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sauer CO (1925) The Morphology of Landscape. University of California Publications in Geography. pp 300–303.Google Scholar
  32. Schlögl M, Avian M, Richter G, et al. (2018) On the nexus between landslide susceptibility and transport infrastructure - agent-based vulnerability assessment of rural road networks in the Eastern European Alps. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2018-93 Google Scholar
  33. Sichuan Institute of Urban Planning and Design (2017) http://www.sciup.com/index.php?m=Show&a=index&cid=9 6&id=453 (Accessed on 2017-09-22)
  34. Svobodova K, Sklenicka P, Vojar J (2015) How does the representation rate of features in a landscape affect visual preferences? A case study from a post-mining landscape. International Journal of Mining Reclamation and Environment 29(4): 266–276.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2013.873258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thywissen K (2006) Core terminology of disaster reduction: a comparative glossary. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 448–496.Google Scholar
  36. UNESCO (2018a) World Heritage list. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/(Accessed on 2018-08-06)Google Scholar
  37. UNESCO (2018b) World Heritage list. https://whc.unesco.org/en/convention/(Accessed on 2018-08-06)Google Scholar
  38. Xie ZJ, Zheng Y, Yao HJ, Fang LH, et al. (2017) Preliminary analysis on the source properties and seismogenic structure of Ms7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake. Science China Earth Sciences 61(3): 339–352.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-017-9161-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yi GX, Long F, Liang MJ, et al. (2017) Focal mechanism solutions and seismogenic structure of the 8 August 2017 M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake and its aftershocks, northern Sichuan. Chinese Journal of Geophysics 60(10): 4083–4097.  https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg20171033 (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface ProcessesChinese Academy of SciencesChengduChina
  2. 2.Institute of Mountain Hazards and EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesChengduChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations