Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 1470–1482 | Cite as

Microstructure and strength features of warm and ice-rich frozen soil treated with high-performance cements

  • Gao-chen Sun
  • Jian-ming ZhangEmail author
  • Ying-sheng Dang
  • Cong Ding
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Warm and ice-rich frozen soil (WIRFS) exhibits lower shear strength due to the weak binding forces between soil particles and ice crystals. To enhance the strength of WIRFS, frozen soil was treated separately with Portland, Phosphate, Sulphoaluminate, Portland-Phosphate and Portland-Sulphoaluminate cements. After the samples were cured under -1.0°C for 7 days, the microscopic pore distribution characteristics and the macro-mechanical properties of WIRFS were investigated using mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests. To quantitatively analyze the laws of pore-size transformation and the variation of Hausdorff volumetric fractal dimensions for pre-and post-treated WIRFS, the CURVEEXTRACT and Image-Pro Plus (IPP) image analysis system has been developed for analysing SEM images of the soil samples. Statistics of the pore-area dimension and pore-volume dimension were calculated. The results reveal that the cement-based treatment of WIRFS can improve the cementation fill of soil pores and the bond forces between soil particles. There is an evident correlation between the microstructure characteristics and the mechanical properties of the treated WIRFS. As the fractal dimensions of pore-area decrease, the unconfined compressive strength of cement-treated WIRFS increases significantly. In contrast, as the fractal dimensions of pore-volume increases, the unconfined compressive strength decreases remarkably.

Keywords

Soil stabilizer Frozen soil Microstructure characteristics Macro-mechanical properties Fractal theory Scanning electron microscopy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41471062 and 41401087) and the State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering (Grant No. SKLFSE-ZT-35). The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and advice that aided in improving the quality of this manuscript greatly.

References

  1. ASTM, D.4643-17 (2017) Standard Test Methods for Determination of water content of Soil and Rock by Microwave Oven Heating. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  2. ASTM, D.2216-10. (2010) Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  3. ASTM, D.4404-18 (2018) Standard Test Method for Determination of Pore-volume and Pore-volume Distribution of Soil and Rock by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  4. ASTM, D.2216/2166M-16 (2016) Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Arinze EE, Okafor CC (2015) A Matlab Program for Soil Classification Using Aashto Classification. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering 12(2):58–62.  https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-12255862 Google Scholar
  6. Bommer C, Phillips M, Arenson LU (2010) Practical recommendations for planning, constructing and maintaining infrastructure in mountain permafrost. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 21:97–104.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.679 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basha EA, Hashim R, Mahmud HB, et al. (2005) Stabilization of residual soil with rice husk ash and cement. Construction and Building Materials 19(6): 448–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bracconi P, Sipple M, Mutin JC (2005) Theory of mercury intrusion in a distribution of unconnected wedge-shaped slits. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 284(2): 621–629.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.10.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang XL, Jin HJ, Zhang YL, et al. (2015)Thermal impacts of boreal forest vegetation on active layer and permafrost soils in northern Da Xing’anling (Hinggan) Mountains, Northeast China. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 47(2):47–59.  https://doi.org/10.1657/AAARoC-13-304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chai MT, Zhang H, Zhang JM, et al. (2017) Effect of cement on unconfined compressive strength of warm and ice-rich frozen soil. Construction and Building Materials 149:861–868.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Consoli NC, Heineck KS, Carraro JAH (2010) Portland cement stabilization of Soil-Bentonite for vertical cutoff walls against diesel oil contaminant. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 28(4): 361–371.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9297-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cui ZD, Jia YJ (2013) Analysis of electron microscope images of soil pore structure for the study of land subsidence in centrifuge model tests of high-rise building groups. Engineering Geology 164: 107–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dong YH, Lai YM, Li JB, et al. (2010) Laboratory investigation on the cooling effect of crushed-rock interlayer embankment with ventilated ducts in permafrost regions. Cold Regions Science and Technology 61:136–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daniel R, Raquel N, Rafaela C (2016) Influence of water content in the UCS of soil-cement mixtures for different cement dosages. Procedia Engineering 143:59–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diamond S (1970) Pore size distributions in clays. Clays and Clay Minerals 18:7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisazadeh A, Kassim KA, Nur H (2012) Solid-state NMR and FTIR studies of lime stabilized montmorillonitic and lateritic clays. Applied Clay Science 67:05–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Horpibulsuk S, Kathkan W, Apichatvullop A (2008) An approach for assessment of compaction curves of fine-grained soil at various energies using a one point test. Soils and Foundations 48(1):115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. He N, Li T, Zhong W, et al. (2016) Analysis of the correlation between strength and fractal dimension gravelly soil in debris-flow source areas. The Open Civil Engineering Journal 10:866–879.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501610010866 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaneuji M, Winslow DN, Dolch WL (1980) The relationship between an aggregate’s pore size distribution and its freeze/thaw durability in Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research 10(3):433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kavitha OR, Shanthi VM, Arulrai GP, et al. (2015) Fresh, micro-and macrolevel studies of metakaolin blended self-compacting concrete. Applied Clay Science 114: 370–374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.06.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu SW, Zhang JM (2012) Review on Physic-Mechanical Properties of Warm Frozen Soil, Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology 34:120–129. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Liu YJ, Liu JK, Su ZQ, et al. (2013) Numerical simulation of roadbed slope under seismic action in permafrost regions. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions 5(5):540–547.  https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1226.2013.00540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Latifi N, Eisazadeh A, Marto A (2014) Strength behavior and microstructural characteristics of tropical laterite soil treated with sodium silicate-based liquid stabilizer. Environmental Earth Sciences 72(1): 91–98.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2939-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu J, Li Y, Yang YQ, et al. (2014) Effect of low temperature on hydration performance of the complex binder of silica fumeportland cement. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Science Edition 29:75–81.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-014-0870-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu LC, Lu ZY, Liu SQ, et al. (2009) Durability of alite-calcium barium sulphoaluminate cement. Journal of Wuhan University of Technolotgy. Science Edition 24: 982–985.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-009-6982-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lai YM, Li JB, Li QZ (2012) Study on damage statistical constitutive model and stochastic simulation for warm and ice-rich frozen silt. Cold Regions Science and Technology 71: 102–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2011.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laure PC, Frank W, Barbara L, et al. (2012) Beneficial use of limestone filler with calcium sulphoauminate cement. Construction and Building Materials 26: 619–627.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lai YM, Li JB, Li QZ (2012) Study on damage statistical constitutive model and stochastic simulation for warm and ice-rich frozen silt. Cold Regions Science and Technology 71:102–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2011.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu YY, Gong YM, Wang X, et al. (2013) Volume fractal dimension of soil particles and relationships with soil physical-chemical properties and plant species diversity in an alpine grassland under different disturbance degrees. Journal of Arid Land 5(4): 480–487.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-013-0184-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marto A, Latifi N, Eisazadeh A (2014) Effect of non-traditional additives on engineering and microstructural characteristics of laterite soil. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 39(10): 6949–6958.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1286-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Modarres A, Nosoudy YM (2015) Clay stabilization using coal waste and lime-Technical and environmental impacts. Applied Clay Science 116: 281–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.03.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Metelková Z, Boháč J, Přikryl R, et al. (2012) Maturation of loess treated with variable lime admixture:Pore space textural evolution and related phase changes. Applied Clay Science 61: 37–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mollerup M, Hansen S, Petersen C, et al. (2008) A Matlab program for estimation of unsaturated hydraulic soil parameters using an infiltrometer technique. Computers & Geosciences 34:861–875.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mahnke M, Mögel HJ (2003) Fractal analysis of physical adsorption on material surfaces. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 216(1–3): 215–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0927-7757(02)00577-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nima L, Ahmad Safuan AS, Sumi S, et al. (2015) Micro-structural analysis of strength development in low-and high swelling clays stabilized with magnesium chloride solution-A green soil stabilizer. Applied Clay Science 118: 195–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peng X, Horn R, Peth S, et al. (2005) Quantification of soil shrinkage in 2D by digital image processing of soil surface. Soil & Tillage Research 91:173–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pirmoradian N, Sepaskhah AR, Hajabbasi MA (2005) Application of fractal theory to quantify soil aggregate stability as influenced by tillage treatments. biosystems Engineering 90(2): 227–234  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Qian J, Yu QH, You YH, et al. (2012) Analysis on the convection cooling process of crushed-rock embankment of high-grade highway in permafrost regions. Cold Regions Science and Technology 78: 115–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Qin YH, Zhang JM, Zheng B, et al. (2009) Experimental study for the compressible behavior of warm and ice-rich frozen soil under the embankment of Qinghai-Tibet Railroad. Cold Regions Science and Technology 57:148–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sayen S, Mallet J, Guillon E (2009) Aging effect on the copper sorption on a vineyard soil: Column studies and SEM-EDS analysis. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 331(1): 47–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2008.11.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shear DL, Olsen HW, Nelson KR (1993) iEffects of desiccation on the hydraulic conductivity versus void ratio relationship for a natural clay. Washington DC: Transportation research record, NRC National Academy Press 1369:130–135.Google Scholar
  42. Tang CS, Shi B, Gao W, et al. (2007) Strength and mechanical behavior of short polypropylene fiber reinforced and cement stabilized clayey soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 25(3): 194–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yong R, Ouhadi V (2007) Experimental study on instability of bases on natural and lime/cement-stabilized clayey soils. Applied Clay Science 35(3–4): 238–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2006.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sukmak P, Horpibulsuk S, Shen SL, et al. (2013) Factors influencing strength development in clay-fly ash geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials 47:1125–1136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang JW, Li JP, Quan XJ (2013) Thermal stability analysis under embankment with asphalt pavement and cement pavement in permafrost regions. The Scientific World Journal 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/549623
  46. Zhang CL, Jiang GL, Su LJ, et al. (2017) Effect of cement on the stabilization of loess. Journal of Mountain Science 14(11): 2325–2336.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4365-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang ZL, Zhang JM, Zhang H (2018) Effects and mechanisms of ionic soil stabilizers on warm frozen soil. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 43(10): 5657–5666.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3250-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and ResourcesChinese Academy of SciencesLanzhouChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.China State Construction Engineering Corporation Aecom Consultant Co., Ltd.LanzhouChina
  4. 4.College of Water & Architectural EngineeringShihezi UniversityShiheziChina
  5. 5.Shanghai InvestigationDesign & Research Institute Co., Ltd.ShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations