Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 15, Issue 10, pp 2182–2191 | Cite as

Rainfall and inflow effects on soil erosion for hillslopes dominated by sheet erosion or rill erosion in the Chinese Mollisol region

  • Hai-ou Shen
  • Lei-lei Wen
  • Yun-feng He
  • Wei Hu
  • Hong-li LiEmail author
  • Xiao-cui Che
  • Xin Li


Erosion agents and patterns profoundly affect hillslope soil loss characteristics. However, few attempts have been made to analyze the effects of rainfall and inflow on soil erosion for hillslopes dominated by sheet erosion or rill erosion in the Chinese Mollisol region. The objective of this study was to discuss the erosive agent (rainfall or inflow), hillslope erosion pattern (sheet erosion or rill erosion) and slope gradient effects on runoff and soil losses. Two soil pans (2.0 m long, 0.5 m wide and 0.5 m deep) with 5° and 10° slopes were subjected to rainfall (0 and 70 mm h–1) and inflow (0 and 70 mm h–1) experiments. Three experimental combinations of rainfall intensity (RI) and inflow rate (IR) were tested using the same water supply of 70 mm by controlling the run time. A flat soil surface and a soil bed with a straight initial rill were prepared manually, and represented hillslopes dominated by sheet erosion and rill erosion, respectively. The results showed that soil losses had greater differences among treatments than total runoff. Soil losses decreased in the order of RI70+IR70 > RI70+IR0 > RI0+IR70. Additionally, soil losses for hillslopes dominated by rill erosion were 1.7–2.2 times greater at 5° and 2.5–6.9 times greater at 10° than those for hillslopes dominated by sheet erosion. The loss of <0.25 mm soil particles and aggregates varying from 47.72%–99.60% of the total soil loss played a dominant role in the sediment. Compared with sheet erosion hillslopes, rill erosion hillslopes selectively transported more microaggregates under a relatively stable rill development stage, but rills transported increasingly more macroaggregates under an active rill development stage. In conclusion, eliminating raindrop impact on relatively gentle hillslopes and preventing rill development on relatively steep hillslopes would be useful measures to decrease soil erosion and soil degradation in the Mollisol region of northeastern China.


Runoff Soil loss Slope gradient Rill erosion Mollisol region 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41601281, 41701313); and the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFE0202900).


  1. Asadi H, Ghadiri H, Rose CW, et al. (2007) An investigation of flow–driven soil erosion processes at low streampowers. Journal of Hydrology 342: 134–142. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barral MT, Bujan E, Devesa R, et al. (2007) Comparison of the structural stability of pasture and cultivated soils. Science of the Total Environment 378: 174–178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barthes B, Roose E (2002) Aggregate stability as an indicator of soil susceptibility to runoff and erosion; validation at several levels. Catena 47: 133–149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bewket W, Sterk G (2003) Assessment of soil erosion in cultivated fields using a survey methodology for rills in the Chemoga watershed, Ethiopia. Agriculture. Ecosystems & Environment 97: 81–93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruno C, Di Stefano C, Ferro V (2008) Field investigation on rilling in the experimental Sparacia area, South Italy. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 33: 263–279. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryan RB, Rockwell DL (1998) Water table control on rill initiation and implications for erosional response. Geomorphology 23: 151–169. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cui M, Cai QG, Zhu AX, Fan HM (2007) Soil erosion along a long slope in the gentle hilly areas of black soil region in Northeast China. Journal of Geographical Sciences 17(3): 375–383. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Descroix L, González Barrios JL, Viramontes D, et al. (2008) Gully and sheet erosion on subtropical mountain slopes: Their respective roles and the scale effect. Catena 72: 325–339. DiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Stefano C, Ferro V, Pampalone V, Sanzone F (2013) Field investigation of rill and ephemeral gully erosion in the Sparacia experimental area, South Italy. Catena 101: 226–234. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fang HY, Sun LY (2017) Modelling soil erosion and its response to the soil conservation measures in the black soil catchment, Northeastern China. Soil & Tillage Research 165: 23–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghadiri H, Payne D (1981) Raindrop impact stress. Journal of Soil Science 32: 41–49. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo QK, Hao YF, Liu BY (2015) Rates of soil erosion in China: A study based on runoff plot data. Catena 124: 68–76. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hairsine PB, Rose CW (1992a) Modeling water erosion due to overland flow using physical principles, I. Sheet flow. Water Resources Research 28 (1): 237–243. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hairsine PB, Rose CW (1992b) Modeling water erosion due to overland flow using physical principles, II–Rill flow. Water Resources Research 28 (1): 245–250. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. He JJ, Sun LY, Gong HL, et al. (2016) The characteristics of rill development and their effects on runoff and sediment yield under different slope gradients. Journal of Mountain Science 13(3): 397–404. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Issa OM, Bissonnais YL, Planchon O, et al. (2006) Soil detachment and transport on field–and laboratory–scale interrill areas: erosion processes and the size–selectivity of eroded sediment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 31: 929–939. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jiang YL, Zheng FL, Wang B, et al. (2013) The impact of sheet and gully erosion on soil aggregate losses in the black soil region of Northeast China. Acta Ecologica Sinica: 33(24): 7774–7781. (In Chinese, with English Abstract) Google Scholar
  18. Kinnell PIA (2005) Raindrop–impact–induced erosion processes and prediction: a review. Hydrological Processes 19: 2815–2844. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koiter AJ, Owens PN, Petticrew EL, Lobb DA (2017). The role of soil surface properties on the particle size and carbon selectivity of interrill erosion in agricultural landscapes. Catena 153: 194–206. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lado M Ben–Hur M, Shainberg I (2004) Soil Wetting and Texture Effects on Aggregate Stability, Seal Formation, and Erosion. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68(6): 1992–1999. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Legout C, Leguéois S, Le Bissonnais Y, Malam Issa O (2005) Splash distance and size distributions for various soils. Geoderma 124: 279–292. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu HH, Zhang TY, Liu BY, et al. (2013) Effects of gully erosion and gully filling on soil depth and crop production in the black soil erosion, northeast China. Environmental Earth Science 68: 1723–1732. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu XB, Zhang XY, Wang YX, et al. (2010) Soil degradation: A problem threatening the sustainable development of agriculture in Northeast China. Plant Soil and Environment 56: 87–97. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu XB, Zhang SL, Zhang XY, et al. (2011) Soil erosion control practices in Northeast China: A mini–review. Soil & Tillage Research 117: 44–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu ZS, Zhang L, Yang ZD, et al. (2014) Derivation of a New Generation of Stormwater Intensity Formula for Changchun. China Water & Wastewater 30(9): 147–150. (In Chinese, with English Abstract)Google Scholar
  26. Lu J, Zheng FL, Li GF, et al. (2016) The effects of raindrop impact and runoff detachment on hillslope soil erosion and soil aggregate loss in the Mollisol region of Northeast China. Soil & Tillage Research 161: 79–85. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ma RM, Li ZX, Cai CF, Wang JG (2014) The dynamic response of splash erosion to aggregate mechanical breakdown through rainfall simulation events in Ultisols (subtropical China). Catena 121: 279–287. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meshesha DT, Tsunekawa A, Tsubo M, et al. (2016) Evaluation of kinetic energy and erosivity potential of simulated rainfall using laser precipitation monitor. Catena 137: 237–243. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nearing MA, Xie Y, Liu BY, Ye Y (2017) Natural and anthropogenic rates of soil erosion. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 5: 77–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oliveira PTS, Wendland E, Nearing MA (2013) Rainfall erosivity in Brazil: a review. Catena 100: 139–147. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ou Y, Rousseau AN, Wang LX, Yan BX (2017) Spatio–temporal patterns of soil organic carbon and pH in relation to environmental factors–A case study of the Black Soil Region of Northeastern China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 245: 22–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palmer RS (1965) Waterdrop impact forces. Transactions of the ASAE 8: 69–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pelt RSV, Hushmurodov SX, Baumhardt RL, et al. (2017) The reduction of partitioned wind and water erosion by conservation agriculture. Catena 148: 160–167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Polyakov VO, Nearing MA (2003) Sediment transport in rill flow under deposition and detachment conditions. Catena 51: 33–43. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Proffitt A, Rose CW, Lovell CJ (1993) Settling velocity characteristic of sediment detached from a soil Surface by raindrop impact. Catena 20: 27–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shen HO, Zheng FL, Wen LL, et al. (2015) An experimental study of rill erosion and morphology. Geomorphology 231: 193–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shen HO, Zheng FL, Wen LL, et al. (2016) Impacts of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on rill erosion processes at loessial hillslope. Soil & Tillage Research 155: 429–436. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Strohmeier SM, Laaha G, Holzmann H, Klik A (2016) Magnitude and occurrence probability of soil loss: a risk analytical approach for the plot scale for two sites in Lower Austria. Land Degradation and Development 27 (1): 43–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Strohmeier SM, Nouwakpo SK, Huang CH, Klik A (2014) Flume experimental evaluation of the effect ofrill flowpath tortuosity on rill roughness based on the Manning–Strickler equation. Catena 118: 226–233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tayfur G, Kavvas ML (1994) Spatially averaged conservation equations for interacting rill–interrill area overland flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 120: 1426–1448. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vaezi AR, Ahmadi M, Cerdà A (2017) Contribution of raindrop impact to the change of soil physical properties and water erosion under semi–arid rainfalls. Science of the Total Environment 583: 382–392. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wen LL, Zheng FL, Shen HO, et al. (2015) Rainfall intensity and inflow rate effects on hillslope soil erosion in the Mollisol region of Northeast China. Natural Hazards 79: 381–395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xin Y, Xie Y, Liu YX, et al. (2016) Residue cover effects on soil erosion and the infiltration in black soil under simulated rainfall experiments. Journal of Hydrology 543: 651–658. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xu XZ, Xu Y, Chen SC, et al. (2010) Soil loss and conservation in the black soil region of Northeast China: A retrospective study. Environmental Science & Policy 13: 793–800. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xu XM, Zheng FL, Wilson GV, et al. (2018) Comparison of runoff and soil loss in different tillage systems in the Mollisol region of Northeast China. Soil & Tillage Research 177: 1–11. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yang QS, Zheng FL, Wen LL, et al. (2011) Effects of mulch cover on hillslope soil erosion and nutrient loss in black soil region of northeast China. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation 31(2): 1–5. (in Chinese, with English Abstract) Google Scholar
  47. Yao Q, Liu J, Yu Z, et al. (2017) Three years of biochar amendment alters soil physiochemical properties and fungal community composition in a black soil of northeast china. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 110: 56–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang YG, Wu YQ, Liu BY, et al. (2007) Characteristics and factors controlling the development of ephemeral gullies in cultivated catchments of black soil region, Northeast China. Soil & Tillage Research 96: 28–41. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Resources and EnvironmentJilin Agricultural UniversityChangchunChina
  2. 2.Songliao Water Resources CommissionMinistry of Water ResourcesChangchunChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and AgroecologyChinese Academy of SciencesHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations