Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 470–485 | Cite as

Impact of polymer mixtures on the stabilization and erosion control of silty sand slope

  • Qing-wen Yang
  • Xiang-jun PeiEmail author
  • Run-qiu Huang
Article

Abstract

Silty sand can be prone to erosion because it is short of stability cementation materials. In recent years, various emerging soil stabilizers, especially natural organic substance and polymer, have been used to improve soil strength, water stability and ability of erosion resistance. In this study, a new type of soil stabilization additive modified carboxymethyl cellulose (M-CMC), consisting of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and polyacrylamide (PAM), was developed for stabilization treatment of silty sand. A series of laboratory tests were conducted to evaluate the performance of M-CMC application on shear strength, permeability, water susceptibility and microstructure of the silty sand soil treated with additive concentration range of 0% - 1.3%. Moreover, rainfall simulation experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of M-CMC on the erosion control of silty sand which compacted soil in a large-sized runoff (1 m2) plots. Test plot which treated with 1.1% concentration of soil stabilizer and control plot which treated with same amount of water were cured outdoor for 50 days before rainfall simulation test. Rainfall intensity was applied at 120 mm·h-1 for 60 min. Finally, a field test is performed in order to assess the practical application effect of silty sand with 1.1% M-CMC. In general, the results showed that an increase of the concentration of M-CMC resulted in an improvement in water susceptibility and shear strength but a decrease in the infiltration rate. Internal friction angle of the treated soil remarkably increased under a low M-CMC concentration (less than 0.7%), while cohesion of them sharply increased under a relatively high M-CMC concentration (larger than 0.7%). Water susceptibility of the treated samples was improved remarkably under a relatively high M-CMC concentration (larger than 0.7%). Permeability coefficient of them decreased significantly when the M-CMC concentration was increased from 0 to 0.5% and, then, from 0.9% to 1.3%. Based on the images obtained from a scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the “coating” and “netting” effects were attributable to the observed improvement of the treated soil. When a plot was protected by a thin layer of soil treated with 1.1% MCMC, its erosion resistance was greatly improved, infiltration rate of water and soil loss yield of plot decreased greatly and even though under a rainfall intensity of 120 mm·h-1. The field test with long-term monitoring (three years) confirmed the M-CMC can effectively control erosion of silty sand slopes for a prolonged period of time.

Keywords

Soil stabilization Water susceptibility permeability Erosion Water retention Cementation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to editor for his helpful suggestions and meticulous editing, as well as two anonymous reviewers for their critical questions and insightful comments which helped to improve the original manuscript. This study was financially supported by the National Key R & D Program (2017YFC1501002), the Major Program of the National Science Foundation of China (No. 41790445).

References

  1. Abu-Zreig M (2006) Runoff and erosion control of silt clay soil with land application of polyacrylamide: (Abfluss-und Erosionsregulierung eines sandigen Lehmbodens durch Anwendung von Polyacrylamid). Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 52(3): 289–298.  https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2006.04.152 Google Scholar
  2. Al-Khanbashi A, Abdalla SW (2006) Evaluation of three waterborne polymers as stabilizers for sandy soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 24(6): 1603–1625.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-005-4895-3 Google Scholar
  3. Amundson R, Heimsath A, Owen J, et al. (2015) Hillslope soils and vegetation. Geomorphology 234: 122–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.031 Google Scholar
  4. Andry H, Yamamoto T, Irie T, et al. (2009) Water retention, hydraulic conductivity of hydrophilic polymers in sandy soil as affected by temperature and water quality. Journal of Hydrology 373(1): 177–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.020 Google Scholar
  5. ASTM D698-12. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12 400 ftlbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, www.astm.orgGoogle Scholar
  6. Barry PP, Stott DE, Bradford JM (1991) Organic polymers' effect on soil shear strength and detachment by single raindrops. Soil Science Society of America 55(3): 799–804.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500030028x Google Scholar
  7. Benke N, Takács E, Wojnárovits L, et al. (2007) Pre-irradiation grafting of cellulose and slightly carboxymethylated cellulose (CMC) fibres. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 76: 1355–1359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2007.02.031 Google Scholar
  8. Cardoso R, Pires I, Duarte SOD, et al. (2018) Effects of clay's chemical interactions on biocementation. Applied Clay Science 156: 96–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2018.01.035 Google Scholar
  9. Cui SH, Pei XJ, Wu HY, et al. (2018) Centrifuge model test of an irrigation-induced loess landslide in the Heifangtai loess platform, Northwest China. Journal of Mountain Science 15(1): 130–143.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4490-0 Google Scholar
  10. Feng TJ, Wei W, Chen LD, et al. (2018) Assessment of the impact of different vegetation patterns on soil erosion processes on semiarid loess slopes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 43: 1860–1870.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4361 Google Scholar
  11. Fullen MA, Booth CA, Brandsma RT (2006) Long-term effects of grass ley set-aside on erosion rates and soil organic matter on sandy soils in east Shropshire, UK. Soil & Tillage Research 89(1): 122–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.07.003 Google Scholar
  12. Gasmo JM, Rahardjo H, Leong EC (2000) Infiltration effects on stability of a residual soil slope. Computers & Geotechnics 26(2): 145–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(99)00035-XGB/T50123-1999. Standard for soil test method. Ministry of construction, P.R. China. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Głąb T, Palmowska J, Zaleski T, et al. (2016) Effect of biochar application on soil hydrological properties and physical quality of sandy soil. Geoderma 281: 11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.06.028 Google Scholar
  14. Gyssels G, Poesen J, Bochet E, et al. (2005) Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review. Prog. Physical Geogragh 29(2): 189–217.  https://doi.org/10.1191/0309133305pp443ra Google Scholar
  15. Hossam MS, Safaa GAA, Abdel WME (2004) Synthesis and characterization of novel gels based on carboxymethyl cellulose/acrylic acid prepared by electron beam irradiation. Reactive and Functional Polymers 61(3): 397–404.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2004.07.002 Google Scholar
  16. Hu F, Liu J, Xu C, et al. (2018) Soil internal forces contribute more than raindrop impact force to rainfall splash erosion. Geoderma 330: 91–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.031 Google Scholar
  17. Ibrahim SM, Salmawi KME, Zahran AH (2007) Synthesis of crosslinked superabsorbent carboxymethyl cellulose/acrylamide hydrogels through electron‐beam irradiation. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 104(3): 2003–2008.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.25916 Google Scholar
  18. Inbar A, Ben-Hur M, Sternberg M, Lado M (2015) Using polyacrylamide to mitigate post-fire soil erosion. Geoderma 239: 107–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.09.026 Google Scholar
  19. Kamon M, Nontananandh S (1991) Combining industrial wastes with lime for soil stabilization. Geotechnical Engineering 117(1): 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(1) Google Scholar
  20. Kiliç R, Küçükali Ö, Ulamiş K (2016) Stabilization of high plasticity clay with lime and gypsum (Ankara, Turkey). Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 75(2): 735–744.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0757-2 Google Scholar
  21. Kinnell P (2005) Raindrop-impact-induced erosion processes and prediction: A review. Hydrological Processes 19: 2815–2844.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5788 Google Scholar
  22. Kruse GAM, Dijkstra TA, Schokking F (2007) Effects of soil structure on soil behaviour: illustrated with loess, glacially loaded clay and simulated flaser bedding examples. Engineering Geology 91(1): 34–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.12.011 Google Scholar
  23. Kuttner BG, Thomas SC (2017) Interactive effects of biochar and an organic dust suppressant for revegetation and erosion control with herbaceous seed mixtures and willow cuttings. Restoration Ecology 25(3): 9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12439 Google Scholar
  24. Kuenza K, Towhata I, Orense RP, et al. (2004) Undrained torsional shear tests on gravelly soils. Landslides 1(3): 185–194.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-004-0023-3 Google Scholar
  25. Laird DA (1997) Bonding between polyacrylamide and clay mineral surfaces. Soil Science 162(11): 826–832.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199711000-00006 Google Scholar
  26. Latifi N, Horpibulsuk S, Meehan CL, et al. (2017) Improvement of problematic soils with biopolymer - an environmentally friendly soil stabilizer. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 29(2): 04016204.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001706 Google Scholar
  27. Lentz RD (2015) Polyacrylamide and biopolymer effects on flocculation, aggregate stability, and water seepage in a silt loam. Geoderma 241-242: 289–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.11.019 Google Scholar
  28. Li FH, Wang AP (2016) Interaction effects of polyacrylamide application and slope gradient on potassium and nitrogen losses under simulated rainfall. Catena 136: 162–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.05.008 Google Scholar
  29. Li, XR, Xiao HL, He MZ (2006) Sand barriers of straw checkerboards for habitat restoration in extremely arid desert regions. Ecological Engineering 28(2): 149–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.05.020 Google Scholar
  30. Liu J, Shi B, Jiang H, et al. (2011) Research on the stabilization treatment of clay slope topsoil by organic polymer soil stabilization additive. Eng. Geol. 117(1): 114–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.10.011 Google Scholar
  31. Luo XR (2014) Analysis of variation on temperature and precipitation in recent 52 years and future projection Jimunai County, Xinjiang. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 30(5): 297–302. (In Chinese) http://lib.cqvip.com/read/detail.aspx?ID=49011003#Google Scholar
  32. Maleki M, Ebrahimi S, Asadzadeh F, et al. (2016) Performance of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation on wind erosion control of sandy soil. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology 13(3): 937–944.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0921-z Google Scholar
  33. Nie HR, Liu MZ, Zhan FL, et al. (2004) Factors on the preparation of carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel and its degradation behavior in soil. Carbohydrate Polymer 58(2): 185–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.06.035 Google Scholar
  34. Pei XJ, Zhang FY, Wu W, et al. (2015) Physicochemical and index properties of loess stabilized with lime and fly ash piles. Applied Clay Science 114: 77–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.05.007 Google Scholar
  35. Pourakbar S, Huat BK (2017) A review of alternatives traditional cementitious binders for engineering improvement of soils. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 11(2): 206–216.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2016.1207042 Google Scholar
  36. Rezaeimalek S, Huang J, Bin-Shafique S, et al. (2017) Evaluation of curing method and mix design of a moisture activated polymer for sand stabilization. Construction and Building Materials 146: 210–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.093 Google Scholar
  37. Sadeghi SH, Abdollahi Z, Darvishan AK (2013) Experimental comparison of some techniques for estimating natural raindrop size distribution on the south coast of the Caspian Sea, Iran. Hydrological Sciences Journal 58(6): 1374–1382.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.814917 Google Scholar
  38. Santoni R, Tingle J, Nieves M (2005) Accelerated strength improvement of silty sand with nontraditional additives. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1936(1): 34–42.  https://doi.org/10.3141/1936-05 Google Scholar
  39. Sasahara K, Sakai N (2014) Development of shear deformation due to the increase of pore pressure in a sandy model slope during rainfall. Engineering Geology 170(4): 43–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.12.005 Google Scholar
  40. Shi ZH, Yan FL, Li L, et al. (2010) Interrill erosion from disturbed and undisturbed samples in relation to topsoil aggregate stability in red soils from subtropical China. Catena 81(3): 240–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2010.04.007 Google Scholar
  41. Si KS (2013) A rural named Bie Si Tie Ke in Jimunai subjected to heavy rain attacks Local News of Jimunai. (In Chinese) http://www.xjzx.com/links/10338.htm (accessed on 11-07-2013)Google Scholar
  42. Stahl JD, Cameron MD, Haselbach J (2000) Biodegradation of superabsorbent polymers in soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 7(2): 83–88.  https://doi.org/10.1065/espr199912.014 Google Scholar
  43. Theng BKG (1982) Clay-polymer interactions: Summary and perspectives. Clays and Clay Mineralogy 30(1): 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1982.0300101 Google Scholar
  44. Wach RA, Mitomo H, Yoshii F, et al. (2001) Hydrogel of biodegradation cellulose derivatives. II. Effect of some factors on radiation-induced crosslinking of CMC. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 81(12): 3030–3037.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1753 Google Scholar
  45. Wang B, Zheng FL, Römkens MJM, et al. (2013) Soil erodibility for water erosion: a perspective and Chinese experiences. Geomorphology 187: 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.01.018 Google Scholar
  46. Wang M, Xu L, Hu H, et al. (2007) Radiation synthesis of PVP/CMC hydrogels as wound dressing. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 265(1): 385–389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.09.009 Google Scholar
  47. Weston DP., Lentz RD., Cahn MD, et al. (2009) Toxicity of anionic polyacrylamide formulations when used for erosion control in agriculture. Journal of Environment Quality 38(1): 238–247.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0109 Google Scholar
  48. Wong LS, Mousavi S, Sobhani S, et al. (2016) Comparative measurement of compaction impact of clay stabilized with cement, peat ash and silica sand. Measurement 94: 498–504.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.08.029 Google Scholar
  49. Yang LX, Li XC, Sun HL, et al. (2017) Polyacrylamide molecular formulation effects on erosion control of disturbed soil on steep rocky slopes. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 91(6): 917–924.  https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss10087 Google Scholar
  50. Zhang FY, Kong R, Peng JB (2018) Effects of heating on compositional, structural, and physicochemical properties of loess under laboratory conditions. Applied Clay Science 152: 259–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.11.022 Google Scholar
  51. Zhang LM, Li JL, Zhang J (2015) Variations of summer extreme precipitation events in Altay Prefecture, Xinjiang region, from 1961 to 2010. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology 37 (5): 1199–1208. (In Chinese)  https://doi.org/10.7522/j.isnn.1000-0240.2015.0134 Google Scholar
  52. Zhang LT, Gao Z.L, Yang SW, et al. (2015) Dynamic processes of soil erosion by runoff on engineered landforms derived from expressway construction: A case study of typical steep spoil heap. Catena 128: 108–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.01.020 Google Scholar
  53. Zhuang XC, Yang S, Zhao ZB (2012) Analysis on Precipitation in Altay Prefecture, Xinjiang. Arid Zone Research 29(3): 487–494. (In Chinese)  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0280-z Google Scholar
  54. Zhang XJ (2012) A study on polyacrylamide Application in soil and water conservation. Xian: Northwest University. (In Chinese) http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10697-1012443693.htm Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment ProtectionChengdu University of TechnologyChengduChina

Personalised recommendations