Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 15, Issue 7, pp 1383–1396 | Cite as

An international program on Silk Road Disaster Risk Reduction–a Belt and Road initiative (2016–2020)

  • Lei Yu
  • Cui Peng
  • Amar Deep Regmi
  • Virginia Murray
  • Alessandro Pasuto
  • Giacomo Titti
  • Muhammad Shafique
  • Tilak Priyadarshana D. G
Article
  • 108 Downloads

Abstract

Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a Chinese national strategy which calls for cooperative economic, political and cultural exchange at the global level along the ancient Silk Road. The overwhelming natural hazards located along the belt and road bring great challenges to the success of BRI. In this framework, a 5-year international program was launched to address issues related to hazards assessment and disaster risk reduction (DRR). The first workshop of this program was held in Beijing with international experts from over 15 countries. Risk conditions on Belt and Road Countries (BRCs) have been shared and science and technology advancements on DRR have been disseminated during the workshop. Under this program, six task forces have been setup to carry out collaborative research works and three prioritized study areas have been established. This workshop announced the launching of this program which involved partners from different countries including Pakistan, Nepal, Russia, Italy, United Kingdom, Sri Lanka and Tajikistan. The program adopted the objectives of Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 and United Nation Sustainable Development Goals 2030 and was implemented to assess disaster risk in BRCs and to propose suitable measures for disaster control which can be appropriate both for an individual country and for specific sites. This paper deals with the outcomes of the workshop and points out opportunities for the near future international cooperation on this matter.

Keywords

Natural hazards Silk Road Disaster risk reduction Belt and Road Initiative Sendai Framework International collaboration program 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the International partnership program (Grant No. 131551KYSB20160002), National Natural Science Foundation Major International (Regional) Joint Research Project (Grant No. 41520104002) and Science and Technology Service Network Initiative of Chinese Academy of Science (Grant No. KFJSTS- ZDTP-015) and Authors would like to thank all participants of the 1st international workshop for sharing their knowledge and experiences.

Supplementary material

11629_2018_4842_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (85 kb)
An international program on Silk Road Disaster Risk Reduction — a Belt and Road initiative (2016–2020)

References

  1. Commission Staff Working Paper (2010) Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management. EU, Brussels.Google Scholar
  2. Cui P, Amar DR, Zou Q, et al. (2017) Natural Hazards and Disaster Risk in One Belt One Road Corridors. In: Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides-Volume 2 Advances in Landslide Science. pp 1155–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53498-5_131 Google Scholar
  3. Department of Census and Statistics (2007) Report on Census of Buildings and People Affected by the Tsunami-2004. Colombo, Sri Lanka. Department of Census and Statistics. (https://doi.org/www.statistics.gov.lk/tsunami/, assessed on 2017-02-14)Google Scholar
  4. Derbyshire E (1996) Quanternary and glaccial sediments, glaciation style, climate and uplift in the Karakoram and northwest himalaya: review and speculations. Environemental Changes in the Tibetan Plateau and surrounding Areas. In: Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Palaeoecology. E. Derbshire. pp 147–157.Google Scholar
  5. Derbyshire E, Fort M, Owen LA (2001) Geomorphological hazards along the Karakoram Highway: Khunjerab Pass to the Gilgit River, Northern Pakistan. Erdkunde 55: 49–71. (https://doi.org/www.jstor.org/stable/25647347, assessed on 2017-02-14)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guha-Sapir D, Below R, Hoyois P (2015) EM-DAT: The CRED/OFDA International Disaster Database. Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. (https://doi.org/www.emdat.be/, assessed on 2016-11-11)Google Scholar
  7. Digital Belt and Road Program (DBAR) (2017) DBAR Science Plan: An International Science Program for Sustainable Development of the Belt and Road Region Using Big Earth Data. (https://doi.org/go.nature.com/2evoxcj, assessed on 2017-02-14)Google Scholar
  8. Elisseeff V (1998) The silk roads: Highways of culture and commerce. Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  9. Garcin M, Desprats JF, Fontaine M, et al. (2008) Integrated approach for coastal hazards and risks in Sri Lanka. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 8: 577–586. (https://doi.org/hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00406929, assessed on 2017-02-14)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo HD (2017) Big Earth data: A new frontier in Earth and information sciences. Big Earth Data 1(1–2): 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2017.1403062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Günther A, Reichenbach P, Malet JP, et al. (2013) Tier-based approaches for landslide susceptibility assessment in Europe. Landslides 10: 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0349-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hervás J (2007) Guidelines for mapping areas at risk of landslides in Europe. Institute for Environment and Sustainability Joint Research Centre, Italy. https://doi.org/10.2788/63147 Google Scholar
  13. Hewitt K (2009) Catastrophic rock slope failures and late Quaternary developments in the Nanga Parbat–Haramosh Massif, Upper Indus basin, northern Pakistan. Quaternary Science Reviews 28(11–12): 1055–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hewitt K (2009) Rock avalanches that travel onto glaciers and related developments, Karakoram Himalaya, Inner Asia. Geomorphology 103(1): 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kamp U, Growley BJ, Khattak GA, et al. (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for the 2005 Kashmir earthquake region. Geomorphology 101(4): 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu W (2015) Scientific understanding of the Belt and Road Initiative of China and related research themes. Progress in Geography 34(5): 538–544. https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.001 Google Scholar
  17. Liu W, Dunford M. (2016) Inclusive globalization: unpacking China's Belt and Road Initiative. Area Development and Policy 1(3): 323–340. Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Government of Nepal (2015) (https://doi.org/www.moha.gov.np/, assessed on 2017-02-14)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Muhammad Jamil (2016) Presentation: Natural Hazards along the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and Mitigation Measures, 1st international workshop of SiDRR. Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  19. National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Commerce of China (2015) Vision and actions on jointly building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-century maritime Silk Road. Beijing, China: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar
  20. Nakata T (1982) A photogrametric study on active faults in the Nepal Himalayas. Journal of the Nepal Geological Society 2: 67–80.Google Scholar
  21. Panzera F, Lombardo G, Monaco C, et al. (2015) Seismic site effects observed on sediments and basaltic lavas outcropping in a test site of Catania, Italy. Natural Hazards 79(1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1822-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pandey MR, Tandukar RP, Avouac JP, et al. (1995) Interseismic strain accumulation on the Himalayan crustal ramp (Nepal). Geophysical Research Letters 22(7): 751–754. https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL02971 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Regmi AD, Dhital MR, Zhang J, et al. (2016) Landslide susceptibility assessment of the region affected by the 25 April 2015 Gorkha earthquake of Nepal. Journal of Mountain Science 13(11): 1941–1957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3688-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shafique M, van der Meijde M, Khan MA (2016) A review of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake-induced landslides; from a remote sensing prospective. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 118: 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Searle M, Windley B, Coward M, et al. (1987) The closing of Tethys and the tectonics of the Himalaya. Geological Society of America Bulletin 98: 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1987)98<678:TCOTAT>2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Strunz G, Post J, Zosseder K, et al. (2011) Tsunami risk assessment in Indonesia. Natural Hazard and Earth System Sciences 11: 67–82. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-67-2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shi P, Yang X, Xu W (2016) Mapping global mortality and affected population risks for multiple natural hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 7(1): 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-016-0079-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tayyeb Akram (2016) Presentation: Natural Hazards Along China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, 1st international workshop of SiDRR. Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  29. Tilak Priyadarshana (2016) Presentation: Risk Assessment and Mitigation Within a Tsunami Forecasting and Early Warning Framework: A Case Study of Galle Port City, 1st international workshop of SiDRR. Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  30. UNESCAP-TRATE IOTWS Project (2015) Risk Assessment and Mitigation within a Tsunami Forecasting and Early Warning Framework Case Study-Port City of Galle. p 77.Google Scholar
  31. UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. (https://doi.org/www.wcdrr.org/uploads/Sendai_Framework_for_Disas ter_Risk_Reduction_2015-2030.pdf, assessed on: 2016-11-11)Google Scholar
  32. United Nations, General Assembly, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/69/L.85 (12 August 2015). (www.un.org, assessed on: 2017-1-22)Google Scholar
  33. Varnes DJ (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. UNESCO.Google Scholar
  34. Vassiliadis P, Simitsis A, Skiadopoulos S (2002) Conceptual modeling for ETL processes. Presented at the Proceedings of the 5th ACM international workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP, ACM. pp 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/583890.583893 Google Scholar
  35. Villagran de Leon JC (2008) Rapid assessment of potential impacts of a tsunami: Lessons learnt from the port of Galle in Sri Lanka. No.9, SOURCE Publication Series of UNU-EHS, Bonn. p 96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Processes/Institute of Mountain Hazards and EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesChengduChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Public Health EnglandLondonEngland
  5. 5.UNISDR Scientific and Technical Advisory GroupGenevaSwitzerland
  6. 6.Integrated Research on Disaster Risk Scientific CommitteeBeijingChina
  7. 7.Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological ProtectionNational Research CouncilPadovaItaly
  8. 8.National Center of Excellence in GeologyUniversity of PeshawarPeshawarPakistan
  9. 9.Internal Quality Assurance Unit &Center for International AffairsUniversity of RuhunaMataraSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations