Advertisement

Growth and development of carnation ‘Dreambyul’ plantlets in a temporary immersion system and comparisons with conventional solid culture methods

  • Luc The Thi
  • Yoo Gyeong Park
  • Byoung Ryong JeongEmail author
Plant Tissue Culture
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to compare the effects of the culture method—conventional solid medium culture and temporary immersion system (TIS)—on the growth and development of carnation ‘Dreambyul’ plantlets. At the same time, different immersion intervals and immersion durations of TIS culture were also tested to find the optimal setting for mass production of high-quality carnation plantlets in vitro. In the first experiment, the results showed that the shoot length, root length, and number of nodes of plantlets cultured in the TIS were highest when the immersion interval was 8 h. Compared with that of plantlets cultured in the conventional solid medium culture, the fresh weight of plantlets cultured in the TIS was at least 3 times greater. The greatest total chlorophyll content, stomata with normal shapes was observed for plantlets grown in the TIS with an 8-h immersion interval. The lowest H2O2 level was recorded in plantlets cultured with the 8-h immersion interval. In the second study, growth traits such as the shoot length, root length, and stem diameter, as well as the number of shoots and roots tended to increase with immersion durations, and reached their peaks when the immersion duration was 90 s. Excessive water accumulation in tissues and a higher incidence of hyperhydricity were observed in plantlets where the immersion duration was 120 and 150 s. These findings suggest that an immersion interval of 8 h, combined with an immersion duration of 90 s, could be the optimal setting for growth and development of carnation ‘Dreambyul’ plantlets cultured in the TIS.

Keywords

Carnation Dianthus caryophyllus Micropropagation Temporary immersion system 

Notes

Funding information

This research was supported by the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project no. 01090805), Rural Development Administration, the Republic of Korea. Luc The Thi was supported by scholarship from the BK21 Plus Program, and the Ministry of Education.

References

  1. Afreen F (2006) Temporary immersion bioreactor. In: Gupta SD, Ibaraki Y (eds) Plant tissue culture engineering. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 187–201Google Scholar
  2. Ahmadian M, Babaei A, Shokri S, Hessami S (2017) Micropropagation of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) in liquid medium by temporary immersion bioreactor in comparison with solid culture. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 15:309–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arencibia AD, Bernal A, Yang L, Cortegaza L, Carmona ER, Pérez A, Hu CJ, Li YR, Zayas CM, Santana I (2008) New role of phenylpropanoid compounds during sugarcane micropropagation in temporary immersion bioreactors (TIBs). Plant Sci 175:487–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arencibia AD, Vergara C, Quiroz K, Carrasco B, Bravo C, Garcia-Gonzales R (2013) An approach for micropropagation of blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) plants mediated by temporary immersion bioreactors (TIBs). Am J Plant Sci 4:1022–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta Vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asmar SA, Castro EM, Pasqual M, Pereira FJ, Soares JDR (2013) Changes in leaf anatomy and photosynthesis of micropropagated banana plantlets under different silicon sources. Sci Hortic 161:328–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bello-Bello JJ, Cruz-Cruz CA, Pérez-Guerra JC (2019) A new temporary immersion system for commercial micropropagation of banana (Musa AAA cv. Grand Naine). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 55:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berthouly M, Etienne H (2005) Temporary immersion system: a new concept for use liquid medium in mass propagation. In: Hvoslef-Eide AK, Preil W (eds) Liquid culture systems for in vitro plant propagation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 165–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casanova E, Moysset L, Trillas MI (2008) Effects of agar concentration and vessel closure on the organogenesis and hyperhydricity of adventitious carnation shoots. Biol Plant 52:1–8 ornamental plants. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ pp 109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christou A, Manganaris GA, Fotopoulos V (2014) Systemic mitigation of salt stress by hydrogen peroxide and sodium nitroprusside in strawberry plants via transcriptional regulation of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants. Environ Exp Bot 107:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Da Silva A, Pasqual M, Teixeira JB, de Araújo AG (2007) Micropropagation methods of pineapple. Pesq Agropec Bras 42:1257–1260 (In Portuguese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Debergh P, Aitken-Christie J, Cohen D, Grout B, Von Arnold S, Zimmerman R, Ziv M (1992) Reconsideration of the term ‘vitrification’ as used in micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 30:135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Debergh P, Maene L (1984) Pathological and physiological problems related to the in vitro culture of plants. Parasitica 40:69–75Google Scholar
  14. Debergh PC, Harbaoui Y, Lemeur R (1981) Mass propagation of globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus): evaluation of different hypotheses to overcome vitrification with special reference to water potential. Physiol Plant 53:181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Debnath S (2011) Bioreactors and molecular analysis in berry crop micropropagation. Can J Plant Sci 91:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Debnath SC (2009) A scale-up system for lowbush blueberry micropropagation using a bioreactor. HortScience 44:1962–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ducos JP, Labbe G, Lambot C, Pétiard V (2007) Pilot scale process for the production of pre-germinated somatic embryos of selected robusta (Coffea canephora) clones. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 43:652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Escalona M, Lorenzo JC, González B, Daquinta M, González JL, Desjardins Y, Borroto CG (1999) Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr) micropropagation in temporary immersion systems. Plant Cell Rep 18:743–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Etienne H, Berthouly M (2002) Temporary immersion systems in plant propagation. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 69:215–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fki L, Bouaziz N, Kriaa W, Benjemaa-Masmoudi R, Gargouri-Bouzid R, Rival A, Drira N (2011) Multiple bud cultures of ‘Barhee’ date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) and physiological status of regenerated plants. J Plant Physiol 168:1694–1700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Georgiev V, Schumann A, Pavlov A, Bley T (2014) Temporary immersion systems in plant biotechnology. Eng Life Sci 14:607–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoang NN, Kitaya Y, Morishita T, Endo R, Shibuya T (2017) A comparative study on growth and morphology of wasabi plantlets under the influence of the micro-environment in shoot and root zones during photoautotrophic and photomixotrophic micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 130:255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanwar JK, Kumar S (2010) Effect of growth regulators, explants and their interaction on shoot regeneration in carnation. Adv Hortic Sci 24:115–121Google Scholar
  24. Koppenol WH (2001) The Haber-Weiss cycle-70 years later. Redox Rep 6:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krueger S, Robacker C, Simonton W (1991) Culture of Amelanchier × grandiflora in a programmable micropropagation apparatus. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 27:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levin R, Vasil IK (1989) An integrated and automated tissue culture system for mass propagation of plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 25:21–27Google Scholar
  27. Manivannan A, Soundararajan P, Park YG, Wei H, Kim SH, Jeong BR (2017) Blue and red light-emitting diodes improve the growth and physiology of in vitro-grown carnations ‘Green Beauty’ and ‘Purple Beauty’. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 58:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mc Alister B, Finnie J, Watt MP, Blakeway F (2005) Use of the temporary immersion bioreactor system (RITA®) for production of commercial Eucalyptus clones in Mondi Forests (SA). In: Hvoslef-Eide AK, Preil W (eds) Liquid culture systems for in vitro plant propagation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 425–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mordocco AM, Brumbley JA, Lakshmanan P (2009) Development of a temporary immersion system (RITA®) for mass production of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. interspecific hybrids). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 45:450–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Park JE, Park YG, Thi LT, Soundararajan P, Jeong BR (2018) Effect of sucrose concentration, photosynthetic photon flux density, and CO2 concentration on growth and development of micropropagated mountain ash. Propag Ornam Plants 18:58–63Google Scholar
  32. Picoli EA, Otoni WC, Figueira ML, Carolino SM, Almeida RS, Silva EA, Fontes EP (2001) Hyperhydricity in in vitro eggplant regenerated plants: structural characteristics and involvement of BiP (binding protein). Plant Sci 160:857–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramos-Castellá A, Iglesias-Andreu LG, Bello-Bello J, Lee-Espinosa H (2014) Improved propagation of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia jacks. Ex Andrews) using a temporary immersion system. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 50:576–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saher S, Piqueras A, Hellin E, Olmos E (2004) Hyperhydricity in micropropagated carnation shoots: the role of oxidative stress. Physiol Plant 120:152–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stanly C, Bhatt A, Keng CL (2010) A comparative study of Curcuma zedoaria and Zingiber zerumbet plantlet production using different micropropagation systems. Afr J Biotechnol 9:4326–4333Google Scholar
  36. Winarto B, Aziz MA, Rashid AA, Ismail MR (2014) Effect of permeable vessel closure and gelling agent on reduction of hyperhydricity in in vitro culture of carnation. Indones J Agric Sci 5:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ziv M (1991a) Vitrification: morphological and physiological disorders of in vitro shoots. In: Debergh PC, Zimmerman RH (eds) Micropropagation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 45–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ziv M (1991b) Quality of micropropagated plants – vitrification. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 27:64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ziv M (2000) Bioreactor technology for plant micropropagation. Hortic Rev 24:1–30Google Scholar
  40. Ziv M (2005) Simple bioreactors for the mass propagation of plants. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 81:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for In Vitro Biology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luc The Thi
    • 1
  • Yoo Gyeong Park
    • 2
  • Byoung Ryong Jeong
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Horticulture, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus Program)Graduate School of Gyeongsang National UniversityJinjuSouth Korea
  2. 2.Institute of Agriculture and Life ScienceGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuSouth Korea
  3. 3.Research Institute of Life ScienceGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations