Advertisement

Pathways to sustainable low-carbon transitions in an auto-dependent Canadian city

  • Noel KeoughEmail author
  • Geoff Ghitter
Original Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Sustainability Transitions, Management, and Governance

Abstract

Can growth-oriented resource-intensive cities be redesigned as non-consumptive sustainable places in a climate constrained world? This research tests that proposition through a design exploration of the transformation of a 500-ha inner city industrial district in Calgary, Canada, to a sustainable low-carbon city district. The research is formulated with respect to three theoretical axis—theories of urbanism, complexity and transitions; three spatial moments of the production process—production, reproduction and consumption and three temporal moments of the production process—manufacture, use, and post-use. The spatial and temporal moments leverage models of, industrial ecology and circular economy, sustainable cities and derivatives including smart, post-carbon and eco-cities. We employ a participatory design and backcasting methodology informed by theories of path dependence/creation. We establish a set of performance criteria, conduct three rounds of participatory design explorations and follow a strategy of scale-up of existing technology, engineering and design precedents. We identify a set of eight barriers and associated mitigation strategies. These include the stigma of living adjacent to, and the cost to rehabilitate, industrial lands; spatial and cultural auto-dependence; fragmentation of land ownership; infrastructure financing; regional connectivity and path dependence of the planning process. We propose that in order to achieve socially, ecologically and economically sustainable low-carbon cities attention needs to be addressed to culturally transformative alternatives to automobility, new forms of cooperative and localized economy, provision of non-market modes of land development and democratic and regulatory reform. To conclude we reformulate our conceptual framework within three nested domains—socio-technical, econo-political and cultural–cosmological.

Keywords

Sustainability Low-carbon Design Backcasting Industrial ecology Path dependence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers who provided invaluable feedback on early versions of this paper. We would also like to thank the students who enrolled in the courses wherein major design projects were organized around the Manchester design concepts. Their design explorations informed the final design concepts. Finally, we would like to thank the University of Calgary for the funding support that enabled this project to proceed.

References

  1. Arthur W, Ermoliev Y, Kaniovski Y (1987) Path-dependent processes and the emergence of macro-structure. Eur J Oper Res 30:294–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bender T (2006) History, theory & the metropolis (CMS Working Paper Series No. 005-2006). Center for Metropolitan Studies, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Boas T (2007) Conceptualizing continuity and change: the composite-standard model of path dependence. J Theor Politics 19(1): 33–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bronstein Z (2009) Industry and the smart city. Dissent 56(3):27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burch S (2010) In Pursuit of resilient, low carbon communities: an examination of barriers to action in three canadian cities. Energy Policy 38:7575–7585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Canadian Co-Housing Network (2018) http://www.cohousing.ca. Retrieved 20 Oct 2018
  7. Carlsson-Kanyama A, Dreborg KH, Moll HC, Padovan D (2008) Participative backcasting: a tool for involving stakeholders in local sustainability planning. Futures 40:34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Fawcett Publications, GreenwichGoogle Scholar
  9. City of Portland (2018) 2035 Comprehensive Plan. The City of Portland, Portland Oregon https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/2035-comp-plan.pdf. Retrieved 19 Oct 2018
  10. Conaty P, Large M (2013) Co-operative place making: garden city and community land trust solutions for building commonwealth. Stroud Common Wealth, GloucestershireGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooperative Housing Federation of Canada (2018) https://chfcanada.coop/about-co-op-housing/history-of-co-op-housing/. Retrieved 20 Oct 2018
  12. Daseking W, Kohler B, Kemnitz G (2012) Freiburg charter: requirements on urban development and planning for the future. The Academy of Urbanism, freiburg im breisgau, FreiburgGoogle Scholar
  13. David P (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Am Econ Rev Papers Proc 75(2):332–337Google Scholar
  14. Ehrenfeld J (2009) Sustainability by design: a subversive strategy for transforming our consumer culture. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  15. Flyvbjerg B (1998) Rationality and power: democracy in practice. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Foran M (2009) Expansive discourses: the city of calgary, the land developers and residential urban sprawl, 1945-1978. Athabasca University Press, Edmonton CanadaGoogle Scholar
  17. Forum Vauban (1999) A Journey through the model district: a vision taking shape. http://www.carstensperling.de/pdf/life-e-bg.pdf, Retrieved 19 Oct 2018
  18. Fraker H (2013) The hidden potential of sustainable neighbourhoods: lessons from low-carbon communities. Island Press, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fränne L (2007) Hammarby Sjöstad—a unique environmental project in Stockholm. GlashusEtt, Stockholm Sweden. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/ECAEXT/Resources/258598-1279117170185/7247167-1279119399516/7247361-1279119430793/hammarby.pdf. Retrieved 22 Oct 2018
  20. Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1994) Emergent complex systems. Futures 26(6):568–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gardiner Stephen (2008) The prefect moral storm: the ethical challenge of climate change. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Garud R, Karnøe P (2001) Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In: Garud R, Karnøe P (eds) Path dependence and creation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, pp 1–40Google Scholar
  23. Geels F (2010) Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Res Policy 39:495–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geels F (2014) Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory Cult Soc 31(5):21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gunderson L, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  26. Harvey D (2013) Rebel cities: from the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso, BrooklynGoogle Scholar
  27. Hatcher C, Schwarzkopf T (2013) Calgary’s electric transit: an illustrated history of electrified public transportation in Canada's oil capital—streetcars, trolley buses & light trail vehicles (Paperback). DC Books, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  28. Hodson M, Marvin S (2010) Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Res Policy 39(4):477–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hodson M, Marvin S (2013) Low carbon nation?. Taylor and Francis, Abingdon UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holling CS (1994) Simplifying the complex: the paradigms of ecological function and structure. Futures 24(6):598–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Inayatullah S (1994) Life, the universe and emergence. Futures 24(6):683–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. IPCC (2018) The summary for policymakers of the special report on global warming of 1.5°C, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, http://www.ipcc.ch/report/sr15/. Retrieved 19 Oct 2018
  33. Kallis G (2018) Degrowth. Agenda Publishing, Newcastle upon TyneCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kauffman SA (1995) At home in the universe: the Search for laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Kay JJ, Boyle M, Regier HA, Francis G (1999) An ecosystem approach for sustainability: addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures 31(7):721–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kennedy C, Baker L, Dhakal S, Ramaswaml A (2012) Sustainable urban systems: an integrated approach. J Ind Ecol 16(6):775–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Keough N (2005) From indicators to action. Doctoral Dissertation, University of CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  38. Kolko J (2010) Abductive thinking and sensemaking: the drivers of design synthesis. Design Issues 26(1):15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leigh N, Hoelzel N (2012) Smart growth’s blind side. J Am Plan Assoc 78(1):87–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lewis M, Conaty P (2012) The resilience imperative: co-operative transitions to a steady-state economy. New Society Publishers, Gabriola IslandGoogle Scholar
  41. Lewis M, Turnbull S (2011) The co-operative land bank: a solution in search of a home. Canadian Centre for Community Renewal, Port AlberniGoogle Scholar
  42. Loorbach D (2007) Transition management: new mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books Utrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  43. Lovins AB (1977) Soft energy paths: toward a durable peace. Friends of the Earth International, San FranciscoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Macedo J (2013) Planning a sustainable city: the making of Curitiba, Brazil. J Plan History 12(4):334–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martin R, Sunley P (2007) Complexity thinking and economic evolution. J Econ Geogr 7:573–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1998) The tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala, BostonGoogle Scholar
  47. McQuaig L, Brookes N (2011) The trouble with billionaires: why too much money at the top is bad for everyone. Penguin, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  48. Meadowcroft J (2011) Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environ Innov Soc Trans 1(1):70–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Milios L (2018) Advancing to a circular economy: three essential ingredients for a comprehensive policy mix. Sustain Sci 13:861–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Sullivan D (2004) Complexity science and human geography. Trans Inst Bri Geogr 29(3):282–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Patten K (2015) Vancouver community land trust foundation: Examining a model for long-term housing affordability. Univrsity of British Columbia, School of Community and Regional Planning, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  52. Pierson P (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review 94(2):251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Prendeville S, Cherim E, Bocken N (2018) Circular cities: mapping six cities in transition. Environ Innov Soc Trans 26:171–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Punter J (2004) The Vancouver achievement. Univrsity of British Columbia Press, Vancouver CanadaGoogle Scholar
  55. Quist J, Vergragt P (2006) Past and future of backcasting: the shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures 38:1027–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rees W (2010) What’s blocking sustainability? human nature, cognition and denial. J Am Plan Assoc 6(2):13–25Google Scholar
  57. Restakis J (2011) The co-operative city: social and economic tools for sustainability. British Columbia Co-operatives Association, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  58. Robinson J (1982) Energy backcasting: a proposed method of policy analysis. Energy Policy 10(4):337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Robinson J (2003) Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures 35:839–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rubin J (2010) Why your world is about to get a whole lot smaller. Vintage, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  61. Rumming K (2004) Hannover Kronsberg handbook: planning and realization. City of Hannover, HannoverGoogle Scholar
  62. Sachs J (2009) Common wealth: economics for a crowded planet. Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Seiler C (2008) Republic of drivers: a cultural history of automobility in America. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stamp R (2004) Suburban modern: postwar dreams in Calgary. Touchwood Editions, CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  65. Strauss A, Corbin JM (1997) Grounded theory in practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  66. Sustainable Calgary Society (2011) State of our city report 2011: sustainability in a generation. Sustainable Calgary Society, Calgary Canada. http://sustainablecalgary.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/2011-SOOC-Report.pdf. Retrieved 22 Oct 2018
  67. Svane O, Wangel J, Engberg LA, Plam J (2011) Compromise and learning when negotiating sustainability: the brownfield development of Hammarby Sjostad, Stockholm. Int J Urban Sustain Dev 3(2):141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Taft K (2017) Oil’s deep state. Lorimer, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  69. TD Economics (2012) Special report: offshoring, onshoring and the rebirth of american manufacturing. http://www.td.com/document/PDF/economics/special/md1012_onshoring.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2016
  70. Unger N, Shindell DT, Wang JS (2009) Climate forcing by the on-road transportation and power generation sectors. Atmos Environ 43:3077–3085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. van den Bergh J, Truffer B, Kallis G (2011) Environmental innovation and societal transitions: introduction and overview. Environ Innov Soc Trans 1(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van den Toorn M, Guney A (2011) Precedent analysis in landscape architecture; in search of an analytical framework. In: Proceedings of the 4th world congress on design research, Delft The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  73. Varela F, Thompson E, Rosch E (1993) The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  74. Vergragt PJ, Quist J (2011) Backcasting for sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78:747–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vilella M (2018) Zero-waste circular economy: a systemic game-change to climate change. Heinrich-Boll-Stiftung Foundation, Publication Series Ecology, 44(3). https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/radical_realism_for_climate_justice_volume_44_3.pdf
  76. Williams J (2013) The role of planning in delivering low-carbon urban infrastructure. Environ Plan B Plan Des 40(4):683–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wiseman J, Edwards T, Luckinsc K (2013) Post carbon pathways: a meta-analysis of 18 large-scale post carbon economy transition strategies. Environ Innov Soc Trans 8:76–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wuppertal Institute (2009) Sustainable urban infrastructure: Munich edition—paths toward a carbon-free future. Siemens AG, MunichGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Environmental DesignUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and EconomyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations