Advertisement

Compassion in the Clinical Context: Constrained, Distributed, and Adaptive

  • Amanda L. Roze des OrdonsEmail author
  • Lori MacIsaac
  • Jacqueline Hui
  • Joanna Everson
  • Rachel H. Ellaway
Original Research

Abstract

Background

Compassion is intrinsically situated within particular contexts and how these contexts can shape compassion has not been well-described.

Objective

The purpose of the study was to describe how individual and contextual challenges can impact compassion within critical care and palliative care settings.

Design

This qualitative study adopted phenomenology and autoethnography to inform data collection, and principles of activity theory and realist inquiry for data interpretation.

Participants

Five clinicians who work in critical care (n = 3) and palliative care (n = 3) participated in the study.

Approach

Qualitative data were obtained from ethnographic observations, interviews, and focus groups. Participants observed and recorded field notes (n = 53) on instances of suffering and compassion in their workplace settings. At the end of the study period, they participated in a focus group or individual interview to reflect on their experiences. Data was analyzed using constructivist grounded theory techniques and iteratively synthesized through group discussion and model building.

Key Results

The findings reflected four phenomena associated with compassion in context: individual gaps and lapses in compassion, relational challenges, contextual constraints on compassion, and distributed compassion. Individual gaps and lapses in compassion involved inattention, intention vs. perception, personal capacity, and personal toll. Relational challenges included receptivity, fragmentation, and lack of shared understanding. Contextual constraints consisted of situational pressures, the clinical environment, gaps in education, and organizational culture. The distribution of compassion within teams and how teams adapt their behaviors in response to perceived needs for greater compassion modulated these challenges.

Conclusions

The study illustrates the many ways in which compassion can be shaped by context and highlights the role of teamwork in identifying gaps and lapses in compassion and responding in a way that supports patients, families, and colleagues.

KEY WORDS

doctor-patient relationships patient-centered care medical culture critical care, palliative care 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11606_2019_5467_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Cameron RA, Mazer BL, DeLuca JM, Mohile SG, Epstein RM. In search of compassion: a new taxonomy of compassionate physician behaviours. Health Expect 2015;18:1672–1685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Strauss C, Lever Taylor B, Gu J, Kuyken W, Baer R, Jones F, Cavanagh K. What is compassion and how can we measure it? A review of definitions and measures. Clin Psychol Rev 2016;47:15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sinclair S, McClement S, Raffin-Bouchal S, Hack TF, Hagen NA, McConnell S, Chochinov HM. Compassion in health care: an empirical model. J Pain Symptom Manag 2016;51:193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sinclair S, Hack TF, Raffin-Bouchal S, McClement S, Stajduhar K, Singh P, Hagen NA, Sinnarajah A, Chochinov HM. What are healthcare providers’ understandings and experiences of compassion? The healthcare compassion model: a grounded theory study of healthcare providers in CanadaBMJ Open 2018;8:e019701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sinclair S, Torres M, Raffin-Bouchal S, Hack TF, McClement S, Hagen NA, Chochinov HM. Compassion training in healthcare: what are patients’ perspectives on training healthcare providers? BMC Med Educ 2016;16:169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crawford P, Gilbert P, Gilbert J, Gale C, Harvey K. The language of compassion in acute mental health care. Qual Health Res 2013;23:719–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sinclair S, Raffin-Bouchal S, Venturato L, Mijovic-Kondejewski J, Smith-MacDonald L. Compassion fatigue: a meta-narrative review of the healthcare literature. Int J Nurs Stud 2017;69:9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Orellana-Rios CL, Radbruch L, Kern M, Regel YU, Anton A, Sinclair S, Schmidt S. Mindfulness and compassion-oriented practices at work reduce distress and enhance self-care of palliative care teams: a mixed-method evaluation of an “on the job” program. BMC Palliat Care 2017;17:3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Manen M. Phenomenology of practice. Phenomenology & Practice 2007;1:11–30.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hayano D. Auto-ethnography: paradigms, problems and prospects. Hum Organ 1979:38;99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellaway RH, Bates J. Exploring patterns and pattern languages of medical education. Med Educ 2015;49:1189–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Engeström Y, Mietinnen R, Punamäki RL. 1999. Perspectives on activity theory. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pawson R. Evidence-Based Policy. A realist perspective. London: Sage; 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charmaz K. Constructionism and the grounded theory. In: Holstein JA, Gubrium JF (Eds). Handbook of constructionist research. New York: The Guilford Press; 2008, 397–412.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sinclair S, Norris JM, McConnell SJ, Chochinov HM, Hack TF, Hagen NA, McClement S, Bouchal SR. Compassion: a scoping review of the healthcare literature. BMC Palliat Care 2016;15:6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Firth Cozens J, Cornwell J. The point of care, enabling compassionate care in acute hospital settings. The Kings Fund, London. 2009.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Burke K. A grammar of motives. New York: Prentice Hall. 1952.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moss M, Good VS, Gozal D, Kleinpel R, Sesser CM. A critical care societies collaborative statement: burnout syndrome in critical care health-care professionals. A call for action. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;194:106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Houston S, Casanova MA, Leveille M, Schmidt KL, Barnes SA, Trungale KR, Fine RL. The intensity and frequency of moral distress among different healthcare disciplines. J Clin Ethics 2013;24:98–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shanafelt TD, Noseworthy JH. Executive leadership and physician well-being: nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout. Mayo Clin Proc 2017;92:129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salas E, Sims DE, Burke CS. Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork? Small Group Res 2005;36:555–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gaba DM, Fish KJ, Howard SK. Crisis management in anesthesiology. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lingard L. Paradoxical truths and persistent myths: reframing the team competence conversation. J Contin Educ Heal Prof 2016;36:S19–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda L. Roze des Ordons
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Lori MacIsaac
    • 2
  • Jacqueline Hui
    • 1
    • 2
  • Joanna Everson
    • 2
  • Rachel H. Ellaway
    • 1
  1. 1.Cumming School of Medicine University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Alberta Health ServicesCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations