Advertisement

Understanding the Context of High- and Low-Testosterone Prescribing Facilities in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA): a Qualitative Study

  • Guneet K. JasujaEmail author
  • Ryann L. Engle
  • Avy Skolnik
  • Adam J. Rose
  • Alexandra Male
  • Joel I. Reisman
  • Barbara G. Bokhour
Original Research

Abstract

Background

Inappropriate testosterone use and variations in testosterone prescribing patterns exist in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) despite the presence of clinical guidelines.

Objective

We examined system and clinician factors that contribute to patterns of potentially inappropriate testosterone prescribing in VHA.

Design

Qualitative study using a positive deviance approach to understand practice variation in high- and low-testosterone prescribing sites.

Participants

Twenty-two interview participants included primary care and specialty clinicians, key opinion leaders, and pharmacists at 3 high- and 3 low-testosterone prescribing sites.

Approach

Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted, transcribed, and coded using a priori theoretical constructs and emergent themes. Case studies were developed for each site and a cross-case matrix was created to evaluate variation across high- and low-prescribing sites.

Key Results

We identified four system-level domains related to variation in testosterone prescribing: organizational structures and processes specific to testosterone prescribing, availability of local guidance on testosterone prescribing, well-defined dissemination process for local testosterone polices, and engagement in best practices related to testosterone prescribing. Two clinician-level domains were also identified, specifically, structured initial testosterone prescribing process and specified follow-up testosterone prescribing process. High- and low-testosterone prescribing sites systematically varied in the four system-level domains, while the clinician-level domains looked similar across all sites. The third high-prescribing site was unusual in that it exhibited the four domains similar to the 3 low-prescribing sites at the time of our visit. This site had greatly reduced its prescribing of testosterone in the interim.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that local organizational factors play an important role in influencing prescribing. Sites have the potential to transform their utilization patterns by providing access to specialty care expertise, an electronic health record-based system to facilitate guideline-concordant prescribing, well-defined dissemination processes for information, guidance from multiple sources, and clarity regarding best practices for prescribing.

KEY WORDS

testosterone prescribing system factors qualitative 

Notes

Funding Information

The research reported/outlined here was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service. Dr. Jasuja is a VA HSR&D Career Development awardee at the Bedford VA (CDA 13-265). The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Bedford VHA Medical Center.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11606_2019_5270_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bhasin S, Brito JP, Cunningham GR, et al. Testosterone Therapy in Men With Hypogonadism: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab., 2018; 103(5): 1715–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jasuja GK, Bhasin S, Reisman JI, et al. Who gets Testosterone? Patient Characteristics Associated with Testosterone Prescribing in the Veteran Affairs System: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32:304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jasuja GK, Bhasin S, Rose AJ. Patterns of testosterone prescription overuse. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000336.
  4. 4.
    Mascarenhas A, Khan S, Sayal R, et al. Factors that may be influencing the rise in prescription testosterone replacement therapy in adult men: a qualitative study. Aging Male 2016; 19(2):90–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Editorial. Testosterone Therapy: Has Overuse Undermined Use? Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(3): 157.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Desroches B, Kohn TP, Welliver C, Pastuszak AW. Testosterone therapy in the new era of Food and Drug Administration oversight. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5(2):207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tavernise S. FDA Panel Backs Limits on Testosterone Drugs. New York: The New York Times Company. Available at: http://nyti.ms/1uU2VZ1. Accessed: January 1, 2019.
  8. 8.
    Lunenfeld B, Mskhalaya G, Zitzmann M, et al. Recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of hypogonadism in men. Aging Male. 2015;18(1):5–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/13685538.2015.1004049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petak SM, Nankin HR, Spark RF, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for clinical practice for the evaluation and treatment of hypogonadism in adult male patients – 2002 update. Endocr Pract. 2002;8:440–56.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grossmann M, Anawalt BD, Wu FC. Clinical practice patterns in the assessment and management of low testosterone in men: an international survey of endocrinologists. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2015;82(2):234–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rose AJ, McCullough MB, Jasuja GK. A three-step health services research approach to improve prescribing. Healthc (Amst). 2017.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aagaard EM, Gonzales R, Camargo CA Jr, et al. Physician champions are key to improving antibiotic prescribing quality. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(3):109–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pouwels KB, Dolk FCK, Smith DRM, Robotham JV, Smieszek T. Actual versus ‘ideal’ antibiotic prescribing for common conditions in English primary care. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2018; 73(2), 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith DRM, Dolk FCK, Pouwels KB, Christie M, Robotham JV, Smieszek T. Defining the appropriateness and inappropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in primary care. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018; 73(2), ii11–ii18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rose AJ, McCullough MB. A Practical Guide to Using the Positive Deviance Method in Health Services Research. Health Serv Res. 2017;52(3):1207–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications; 1994.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Livorsi D, Comer AR, Matthias MS, Perencevich EN, Bair MJ. Barriers to guideline-concordant antibiotic use among inpatient physicians: A case vignette qualitative study. J Hosp Med. 2015;11(3):174–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Livorsi D, Comer A, Matthias MS, Perencevich EN, Bair MJ. Factors Influencing Antibiotic-Prescribing Decisions Among Inpatient Physicians: A Qualitative Investigation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36(9):1065–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goren J, Rose AJ, Engle RL, et al. Organizational Characteristics of Veterans Affairs Clinics With High and Low Utilization of Clozapine. Psychiatr Serv. 2016;67(11):1189–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jasuja GK, Bhasin S, Rose AJ, et al. Provider and Site-Level Determinants of Testosterone Prescribing in the Veterans Healthcare System. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017; 102(9):3226–3233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318(7182):527–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fischer F, Lange K, Klose K, Greiner W, Kraemer A. Barriers and Strategies in Guideline Implementation—A Scoping Review. Parthasarathy S, ed. Healthcare. 2016;4(3):36. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare4030036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Forsner T, Hansson J, Brommels M, Wistedt AÅ, Forsell Y. Implementing clinical guidelines in psychiatry: a qualitative study of perceived facilitators and barriers. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;10:8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-10-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Harrold LR, Field TS, Gurwitz JH. Knowledge, Patterns of Care, and Outcomes of Care for Generalists and Specialists. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(8):499–511. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.08168.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vimalananda VG, Gouri G, Seraj SM, et al. Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(6):323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gupte G, Vimalananda V, Simon SR,et al. Disruptive Innovation: Implementation of Electronic Consultations in a Veterans Affairs Health Care System. JMIR Med Inform. 2016;4(1):e6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Strymish J, Gupte G, Afable MK, et al. Electronic Consultations (E-consults): Advancing Infectious Disease Care in a Large Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(8):1123–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chokshi DA, Scheteman G, Agarwal M. Patient-centered innovation: The VA approach. Healthcare. 2013;1(3):72–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kirsh S, Grace S, Sales A, Jain R. Access to outpatient specialty care: Solutions from an integrated health care system. Am J Med Qual. 2014;30(1):88–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Novick G. Is There a Bias Against Telephone Interviews In Qualitative Research? Research in Nursing & Health. 2008 31(4), 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine (This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guneet K. Jasuja
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ryann L. Engle
    • 3
  • Avy Skolnik
    • 1
  • Adam J. Rose
    • 4
  • Alexandra Male
    • 3
  • Joel I. Reisman
    • 1
  • Barbara G. Bokhour
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), ENRM VAMC Bedford VA Medical CenterBedfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health Law, Policy and ManagementBoston University School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  3. 3.Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR)VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal MedicineBoston University School of MedicineBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations