National Survey of Primary Care Physicians’ Knowledge, Practices, and Perceptions of Prediabetes
Despite strong evidence and national policy supporting type 2 diabetes prevention, little is known about type 2 diabetes prevention in the primary care setting.
Our objective was to assess primary care physicians’ knowledge and practice regarding perceived barriers and potential interventions to improving management of prediabetes.
Cross-sectional mailed survey.
Nationally representative random sample of US primary care physicians (PCPs) identified from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile.
We assessed PCP knowledge, practice behaviors, and perceptions related to prediabetes. We performed chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests to evaluate the association between PCP characteristics and the main survey outcomes.
In total, 298 (33%) eligible participants returned the survey. PCPs had limited knowledge of risk factors for prediabetes screening, laboratory diagnostic criteria for prediabetes, and management recommendations for patients with prediabetes. Only 36% of PCPs refer patients to a diabetes prevention lifestyle change program as their initial management approach, while 43% discuss starting metformin for prediabetes. PCPs believed that barriers to type 2 diabetes prevention are both at the individual level (e.g., patients’ lack of motivation) and at the system level (e.g., lack of weight loss resources). PCPs reported that increased access to and insurance coverage of type 2 diabetes prevention programs and coordination of referral of patients to these resources would facilitate type 2 diabetes preventive efforts.
Addressing gaps in PCP knowledge may improve the identification and management of people with prediabetes, but system-level changes are necessary to support type 2 diabetes prevention in the primary care setting.
KEY WORDSprevention survey research primary care
The authors thank Mr. Paul Sharrett for his assistance with the survey mailings and data entry.
Johns Hopkins Primary Care Consortium Grant
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This study was exempted by the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2017. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2017.Google Scholar
- 5.Balk EM, Earley A, Raman G, Avendano EA, Pittas AG, Remington PL. Combined Diet and Physical Activity Promotion Programs to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Among Persons at Increased Risk: A Systematic Review for the Community Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2015;163(6):437–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program (MDPP) Expanded Model: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2019 [cited 2019 April 23]. Available from: https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/medicare-diabetes-prevention-program/.
- 8.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes Report Card 2010. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2012.Google Scholar
- 9.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes Report Card 2014. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2015.Google Scholar
- 12.Schmittdiel JA, Adams SR, Segal J, Griffin MR, Roumie CL, Ohnsorg K, et al. Novel use and utility of integrated electronic health records to assess rates of prediabetes recognition and treatment: brief report from an integrated electronic health records pilot study. Diabetes Care 2014;37(2):565–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Chan WV, Pearson TA, Bennett GC, Cushman WC, Gaziano TA, Gorman PN, et al. ACC/AHA Special Report: Clinical practice Guideline Implementation Science Work Group: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69(8):1076–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.AMA Physician Masterfile: American Medical Association; 2018 [cited 2018 March 20]. Available from: https://www.ama-assn.org/life-career/ama-physician-masterfile.
- 18.American Diabetes Association. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2018;Suppl 1:S13-S27.Google Scholar
- 19.National Diabetes Prevention Program: Curricula and Handouts: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018 [cited 2019 April 23]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/prevention/lifestyle-program/curriculum.html.
- 28.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Prevention Program. 2018; [cited 2019 April 23]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/prevention/index.html
- 29.American Medical Association. Prevent Diabetes STAT. 2019; [cited 2019 April 23]. Available from: https://preventdiabetesstat.org/index.html
- 30.National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Education Program 2018; [cited 2019 April 23]. Available from: https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/communication-programs/ndep
- 31.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Education Program. 2018; [cited 2019 April 23]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/ndep/index.html
- 37.Petterson S, McNellis R, Klink K, Meyers D, Bazemore A. The State of Primary Care in the United States: A Chartbook of Facts and Statistics. 2018.Google Scholar
- 38.Wright JD, Marsden PV. Handbook of Survey Research. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2010.Google Scholar