Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 34, Issue 12, pp 2733–2734 | Cite as

Gender Differences and Themes in Peer Nominations for Chief Resident: a Qualitative Analysis

  • Maureen D. LyonsEmail author
  • Michelle K. Martinchek
  • Patrick G. Lyons
  • Justin R. Boike
  • John F. McConville
  • Jeanne M. Farnan
Concise Research Report

INTRODUCTION

We sought to describe what qualities residents recognize in peers nominated for the Chief Resident (CR) position and whether particular attributes are valued differently in male and female nominees.

METHODS

We analyzed peer CR nominations from the University of Chicago Internal Medicine Residency Program for academic years 2013–2015. Nominations were solicited via email and nominators were encouraged to include qualitative comments. We used a constructivist paradigm and grounded theory approach to describe attributes noted for CR nomination and gender differences in those nomination comments. Nominator comments were reviewed using an iterative process and data were analyzed using a constant comparative method with no a priori hypotheses. Themes and sub-themes were generated and refined via discussion to develop a final coding strategy. Two investigators then coded the entire sample using this framework, resolving disagreements by discussion. Descriptive statistics were...

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Milestones Guidebook – ACGME. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/MilestonesGuidebook.pdf. Accessed September 5, 2018.
  3. 3.
    Rochon PA, Davidoff F, Levinson W. Women in academic medicine leadership: has anything changed in 25 years? Acad Med. 2016; 91(8):1053–1056.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    The State of Women in Academic Medicine – AAMC. Available at https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/The%20State%20of%20Women%20in%20Academic%20Medicine%202013-2014%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed September 5, 2018.

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of General Internal Medicine St. Louis University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.University of Chicago MedicineChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and the Department of MedicineWashington University in St. Louis School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  4. 4.Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations