Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 34, Issue 10, pp 1981–1983 | Cite as

Differences by Race, Religiosity, and Mental Health in Preferences for Life-Prolonging Treatment Among Medicare Beneficiaries

  • Justin J. SandersEmail author
  • Anna I. Berrier
  • Léonce Nshuti
  • James A. Tulsky
  • Charlotta Lindvall
Concise Research Reports

INTRODUCTION

Patient preferences ought to guide clinical decision-making, particularly in serious illnesses where disease-directed therapies are not always effective and may cause additional suffering. Yet, clinicians commonly struggle to engage seriously ill patients and their families in conversations about treatment preferences,1 and may leave these conversations still unaware of patients’ wishes.2 When compared to Whites, African Americans may have different end-of-life (EOL) care preferences, which may impact the degree to which they are honored.3 We lack understanding about how widespread differences in preferences are. Better population-level data on patient preferences may help prepare clinicians for such discussions about goals of care.

METHODS

We used the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) to assess predictors of EOL treatment preference in two hypothetical scenarios.4NHATS, a longitudinal cohort study of a nationally representative sample of Medicare...

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Simo Goshev of IQSS Harvard University for statistical support.

Funding Information

The authors received funding for this project through the Sojourns Scholars Program to Dr. Sanders from the Cambia Health Foundation, as well as the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Research Scholars Program.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Kale MS, Ornstein KA, Smith CB, Kelley AS. End-of-life discussions with older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(10):1962–1967.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14285.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernacki RE, Block SD, American College of Physicians High Value Care Task F. Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(12):1994–2003.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mack JW, Paulk ME, Viswanath K, Prigerson HG. Racial disparities in the outcomes of communication on medical care received near death. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(17):1533–1540.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.322.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    NIoA (NIA). National Health & Aging Trends Study (NHATS).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cain CL, Surbone A, Elk R, Kagawa-Singer M. Culture and palliative care: preferences, communication, meaning, and mutual decision making. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2018;55(5):1408–1419.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balboni TA, Vanderwerker LC, Block SD, et al. Religiousness and spiritual support among advanced cancer patients and associations with end-of-life treatment preferences and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):555–560.  https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.07.9046.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Justin J. Sanders
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Anna I. Berrier
    • 1
    • 3
  • Léonce Nshuti
    • 1
    • 4
  • James A. Tulsky
    • 1
    • 2
  • Charlotta Lindvall
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteBostonUSA
  2. 2.Division of Palliative MedicineBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health Policy and ManagementUNC Gillings School of Global Public HealthChapel HillUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiostatisticsHarvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations