VA Provider Perspectives on Coordinating COPD Care Across Health Systems
- 182 Downloads
More and more Veterans are receiving care from community providers, increasing the need for effective coordination across health systems. For Veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), this need is intensified by complex comorbidity patterns that often include multiple providers co-managing patient care.
We sought to understand how VA providers perceive coordination with community providers for Veterans with COPD.
Qualitative study of VA providers.
We selected six geographically diverse VA sites and conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with providers practicing in inpatient and/or outpatient settings who care for Veterans with COPD.
Interviews focused on communication with community providers about discharge information and clinic management. We analyzed responses according to the principles of conventional content analysis, allowing inductive themes to emerge.
We interviewed 25 providers during the period of June to October 2017. Qualitative data analysis yielded five themes: (1) VA providers perceive communication challenges between VA and community providers, including difficult, inadequate, and delayed communication; (2) communication is facilitated by personal relationships across health systems; (3) the lack of electronic health record (EHR) interoperability impairs communication, resulting in transmission of unstructured data; (4) poor communication leads to duplicative efforts and wasted resources; and (5) providers frequently rely on patients to communicate about care taking place in the community.
VA providers described major challenges in coordinating with community providers, leading to perceptions of delayed, missed, or duplicative care and jeopardizing the overall quality, safety, and efficiency of Veteran care. Our study highlights the need for system-level solutions to support coordination across health systems for Veterans with COPD and may have implications for other conditions that lead to recurrent hospitalization and/or care in the community.
KEY WORDScoordination interdisciplinary communication qualitative research chronic obstructive pulmonary disease electronic health record
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The project was approved by the Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital Institutional Review Board.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government.
- 4.Department of Veterans Affairs. Expanded Access to Non-VA Care Through the Veterans Choice Program. Federal Register. 2015;80(209):66419–66429.Google Scholar
- 5.The VA Mission Act of 2018. In: VA, ed.Google Scholar
- 10.Pope CA, Davis BH, Wine L, et al. Perceptions of U.S. Veterans Affairs and community healthcare providers regarding cross-system care for heart failure. Chronic Illn. 2017;14(4):1742395317729887.Google Scholar
- 18.Charmez K. Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications Ltd; 2014.Google Scholar
- 20.NVivo qualitative data analysis Software [computer program]. Version 11: QSR International Pty Ltd; 2016.Google Scholar
- 22.Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2000;1(2).Google Scholar
- 25.Care Coordination Model. The MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation;2010.Google Scholar
- 30.Chang ET, Raja PV, Stockdale SE, et al. What are the key elements for implementing intensive primary care? A multisite Veterans Health Administration case study. Healthc (Amst). 2017.Google Scholar
- 32.Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare and Medicaid Programs, and Electroic Health Record Incentive Program: Final Rule. In. Vol 75. Federal Register 2010:44314–44358.Google Scholar
- 34.VA, Cerner Announce Agreement to Provide Seamless Care for Veterans [press release]. Cerner Corporation, May 17, 2018 2018.Google Scholar