Imprinting on Clinical Rotations: Multisite Survey of High- and Low-Value Medical Student Behaviors and Relationship with Healthcare Intensity
Physician behaviors are important to high-value care, and the learning environment medical students encounter on clinical clerkships may imprint their developing practice patterns.
To explore potential imprinting on clinical rotations by (a) describing high- and low-value behaviors among medical students and (b) examining relationships with regional healthcare intensity (HCI).
Multisite cross-sectional survey
Third- and fourth-year students at nine US medical schools
Survey items measured high-value (n = 10) and low-value (n = 9) student behaviors. Regional HCI was measured using Dartmouth Atlas End-of-Life Chronic Illness Care data (ratio of physician visits per decedent compared with the US average, hospital care intensity index, ratio of medical specialty to primary care physician visits per decedent). Associations between regional HCI and student behaviors were examined using unadjusted and adjusted (controlling for age, sex, and year in school) logistic regression analyses, using median item ratings to summarize reported engagement in high- and low-value behaviors.
Of 2623 students invited, 1304 (50%) responded. Many reported trying to determine healthcare costs (1085/1234, 88%), but only 45% (571/1257) reported including cost details in case presentations. Students acknowledged suggesting tests solely to anticipate what their supervisor would want (1143/1220, 94%), show off their ability to generate a broad differential diagnosis (1072/1218, 88%), satisfy curiosity (958/1217, 79%), protect the team from liability (938/1215, 77%), and build clinical experience (533/1217, 44%). Students in higher intensity regions reported significantly more low-value behaviors: each one-unit increase in the ratio of physician visits per decedent increased the odds of reporting low-value behaviors by 20% (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04–1.38; P = 0.01).
Third- and fourth-year medical students report engaging in both high- and low-value behaviors, which are related to regional HCI. This underscores the importance of the clinical learning environment and suggests imprinting is already underway during medical school.
KEY WORDShigh-value cost-conscious care cost-conscious care undergraduate medical education medical students survey
Regional healthcare intensity data from the End-of-Life Chronic Illness Care database were obtained from The Dartmouth Atlas, which is funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Dartmouth Clinical and Translational Science Institute, under award number UL1TR001086 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
This study was prepared with financial support from the American Medical Association as part of the Accelerating Change in Medical Education initiative, and all participating schools received grants through this initiative (see www.changemeded.org for further details).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The institutional review board (IRB) at each participating school approved or exempted this study.
Conflicts of Interest
Dr. Gonzalo reports receiving support from the Josiah Macy Foundation, American Medical Association, and Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Dr. Fancher reports support from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number UH1HP29965, Academic Units for Primary Care Training and Enhancement, for $3,741,116. This information or content and conclusions of this manuscript are those of the authors and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government. All remaining authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
The content reflects the views of the authors.
- 2.Institute of Medicine. The Healthcare Imperative: Lowering Costs and Improving Outcomes: Workshop Series Summary. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2010.Google Scholar
- 3.Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001.Google Scholar
- 5.American College of Physicians. High value care. https://hvc.acponline.org/index.html. Accessed 27 Nov 2018.
- 25.The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. End-of-Life Chronic Illness Care. Available at: http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/tools/downloads.aspx?tab=40. Accessed 27 Nov 2018.
- 26.Goodman D, Esty A, Fisher E, Chang CH. Trends and variations in end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries with severe chronic illness. 2011. Available online at: http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/downloads/reports/EOL_Trend_Report_0411.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2018.
- 27.American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 8th ed. Lenexa: American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2015.Google Scholar
- 28.Association of American Medical Colleges. U.S. medical student applications and matriculants by school, state of legal residence, and sex, 2016-2017. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/download/321442/data/. Accessed 9 Nov 2017.
- 36.Brown SR, Brown J. Why do physicians order unnecessary preoperative tests? A qualitative study. Fam Med. 2011;43:338–43.Google Scholar
- 40.Benson MK, Donovan AK, Hamm M, Zickmund S, McNeil M. The hidden curriculum in high-value care education: resident-perceived barriers to practicing high value care in a training environment [SGIM abstract 2196705]. J Gen Int Med. 2015;30(2 suppl):S274.Google Scholar
- 51.Chernew ME, Sabik LM, Chandra A, Gibson TB, Newhouse JP. Geographic correlation between large-firm commercial spending and Medicare spending. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16:131–8.Google Scholar