Assessing the Effect of Clinical Inertia on Diabetes Outcomes: a Modeling Approach
- 43 Downloads
There are an increasing number of newer and better therapeutic options in the management of diabetes. However, a large proportion of diabetes patients still experience delays in intensification of treatment to achieve appropriate blood glucose targets—a phenomenon called clinical inertia. Despite the high prevalence of clinical inertia, previous research has not examined its long-term effects on diabetes-related health outcomes and mortality.
We sought to examine the impact of clinical inertia on the incidence of diabetes-related complications and death. We also examined how the impact of clinical inertia would vary by the length of treatment delay and population characteristics.
We developed an agent-based model of diabetes and its complications. The model was parameterized and validated by data from health surveys, cohort studies, and trials.
We studied a simulated cohort of patients with diabetes in San Antonio, TX.
We examined 25-year incidences of diabetes-related complications, including retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, and cardiovascular disease.
One-year clinical inertia could increase the cumulative incidences of retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy by 7%, 8%, and 18%, respectively. The effects of clinical inertia could be worse for populations who have a longer treatment delay, are aged 65 years or older, or are non-Hispanic whites.
Clinical inertia could result in a substantial increase in the incidence of diabetes-related complications and mortality. A validated agent-based model can be used to study the long-term effect of clinical inertia and, thus, inform clinicians and policymakers to design effective interventions.
KEY WORDSdiabetes clinical inertia diabetes complications agent-based modeling
Dr. Li’s role in the research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HL141427. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes Data & Statistics. Atlanta, GA; 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/index.html. Accessed August 31, 2018.
- 14.Epstein JM. Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; 2006.Google Scholar
- 18.Li Y, Kong N, Lawley M, Pagán JA. Assessing lifestyle interventions to improve cardiovascular health using an agent-based model. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE Press; 2014:1221–1232.Google Scholar
- 26.The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;2008(358):2545–2559.Google Scholar
- 30.Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. County Health Rankings & Roadmaps. http://www.countyhealthrankings.org. Accessed August 31, 2018.