The Care and Learn Model: a Practice and Research Model for Improving Healthcare Quality and Outcomes
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality conducted internal work to formulate a model that could be used to analyze the Agency’s research portfolio, identify gaps, develop and prioritize its research agenda, and evaluate its performance. Existing models described the structure and components of the healthcare system. Instead, we produced a model of two functions: caring and learning. Central to this model is the commitment to and participation of people—patients, communities, and health professionals—and the organization of systems to respond to people’s problems using evidence. As a product of caring, the system produces evidence that is then used to adapt and continuously improve this response, closely integrating caring and learning. The Agency and the health services research and improvement communities can use this Care and Learn Model to frame an evidence-based understanding of vexing clinical, healthcare delivery, and population health problems and to identify targets for investment, innovation, and investigation.
KEY WORDShealth services research healthcare delivery health policy evidence-based medicine quality improvement
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this article should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the US Department of Health and Human Services.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 1.Davis K, Stremikis K, Schoen C, Squires D. Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, 2014 Update: How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally. The Commonwealth Fund; 2014.Google Scholar
- 3.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Overview of Quality and Access in the U.S. Health Care System. 2017. https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr16/overview.html. Accessed Dec 2017.
- 4.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Mission and Budget. 2017; https://www.ahrq.gov/cpi/about/mission/index.html, 2017.
- 8.Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001.Google Scholar
- 9.Integrating Primary Care Practices and Community-based Resources to Manage Obesity. 2014. http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/improve/community/obesity-pcpresources/index.html.
- 10.Adler N, Cutler D, Jonathan J, Galea S, Glymour M, Koh H, Satcher D. Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Health Disparities. Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine;2016.Google Scholar
- 13.Montori VM. Big Science for patient centred care. BMJ. 2017;359:j5600.Google Scholar
- 17.Gallacher K, Jani B, Morrison D, Macdonald S, Blane D, Erwin P, May CR, Montori VM, Eton DT, Smith F, Batty GD, Mair FS, International Minimally Disruptive Medicine W. Qualitative systematic reviews of treatment burden in stroke, heart failure and diabetes - methodological challenges and solutions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Maddox TM, Albert NM, Borden WB, Curtis LH, Ferguson TB Jr, Kao DP, Marcus GM, Peterson ED, Redberg R, Rumsfeld JS, Shah ND, Tcheng JE, American Heart Association Council on Quality of C, Outcomes R, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Y, Council on Clinical C, Council on Functional G, Translational B, Stroke C. The Learning Healthcare System and Cardiovascular Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(14):e826-e857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Pfadenhauer LM, Gerhardus A, Mozygemba K, Lysdahl KB, Booth A, Hofmann B, Wahlster P, Polus S, Burns J, Brereton L, Rehfuess E. Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar