Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 154–158 | Cite as

The Care and Learn Model: a Practice and Research Model for Improving Healthcare Quality and Outcomes

  • Victor M. Montori
  • Ian Hargraves
  • Robert J. McNellis
  • Theodore G. Ganiats
  • Janice Genevro
  • Therese Miller
  • Richard Ricciardi
  • Arlene S. Bierman
Health Policy

Abstract

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality conducted internal work to formulate a model that could be used to analyze the Agency’s research portfolio, identify gaps, develop and prioritize its research agenda, and evaluate its performance. Existing models described the structure and components of the healthcare system. Instead, we produced a model of two functions: caring and learning. Central to this model is the commitment to and participation of people—patients, communities, and health professionals—and the organization of systems to respond to people’s problems using evidence. As a product of caring, the system produces evidence that is then used to adapt and continuously improve this response, closely integrating caring and learning. The Agency and the health services research and improvement communities can use this Care and Learn Model to frame an evidence-based understanding of vexing clinical, healthcare delivery, and population health problems and to identify targets for investment, innovation, and investigation.

KEY WORDS

health services research healthcare delivery health policy evidence-based medicine quality improvement 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this article should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the US Department of Health and Human Services.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Davis K, Stremikis K, Schoen C, Squires D. Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, 2014 Update: How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally. The Commonwealth Fund; 2014.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stange KC. The problem of fragmentation and the need for integrative solutions. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(2):100–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Overview of Quality and Access in the U.S. Health Care System. 2017. https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr16/overview.html. Accessed Dec 2017.
  4. 4.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Mission and Budget. 2017; https://www.ahrq.gov/cpi/about/mission/index.html, 2017.
  5. 5.
    Stokols D. Establishing and maintaining healthy environments. Toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol. 1992;47(1):6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20(6):64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bindman AB. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Development of a Learning Health Care System. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(7):909–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Integrating Primary Care Practices and Community-based Resources to Manage Obesity. 2014. http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/improve/community/obesity-pcpresources/index.html.
  10. 10.
    Adler N, Cutler D, Jonathan J, Galea S, Glymour M, Koh H, Satcher D. Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Health Disparities. Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine;2016.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, West CP, Sinsky CA. Potential Impact of Burnout on the US Physician Workforce. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(11):1667–1668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ioannidis JP. Stealth research: is biomedical innovation happening outside the peer-reviewed literature? JAMA. 2015;313(7):663–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Montori VM. Big Science for patient centred care. BMJ. 2017;359:j5600.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Atkins D, Kilbourne AM, Shulkin D. Moving From Discovery to System-Wide Change: The Role of Research in a Learning Health Care System: Experience from Three Decades of Health Systems Research in the Veterans Health Administration. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grembowski D, Schaefer J, Johnson KE, Fischer H, Moore SL, Tai-Seale M, Ricciardi R, Fraser JR, Miller D, LeRoy L, Network AMR. A conceptual model of the role of complexity in the care of patients with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care. 2014;52 Suppl 3:S7-S14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gallacher K, Jani B, Morrison D, Macdonald S, Blane D, Erwin P, May CR, Montori VM, Eton DT, Smith F, Batty GD, Mair FS, International Minimally Disruptive Medicine W. Qualitative systematic reviews of treatment burden in stroke, heart failure and diabetes - methodological challenges and solutions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bindman AB, Pronovost PJ, Asch DA. Funding Innovation in a Learning Health Care System. JAMA. 2018;319(2):119–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maddox TM, Albert NM, Borden WB, Curtis LH, Ferguson TB Jr, Kao DP, Marcus GM, Peterson ED, Redberg R, Rumsfeld JS, Shah ND, Tcheng JE, American Heart Association Council on Quality of C, Outcomes R, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Y, Council on Clinical C, Council on Functional G, Translational B, Stroke C. The Learning Healthcare System and Cardiovascular Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(14):e826-e857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pfadenhauer LM, Gerhardus A, Mozygemba K, Lysdahl KB, Booth A, Hofmann B, Wahlster P, Polus S, Burns J, Brereton L, Rehfuess E. Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine (This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor M. Montori
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ian Hargraves
    • 2
  • Robert J. McNellis
    • 1
  • Theodore G. Ganiats
    • 1
  • Janice Genevro
    • 1
  • Therese Miller
    • 1
  • Richard Ricciardi
    • 1
  • Arlene S. Bierman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health and Human ServicesCenter for Evidence and Practice Improvement of the Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityRockvilleUSA
  2. 2.Knowledge and Evaluation Research UnitRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations