Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 179–181 | Cite as

Geographic Trends for United States Allopathic Seniors Participating in the Residency Match: a Descriptive Analysis

  • Claire N. Shappell
  • Jeanne M. Farnan
  • John F. McConville
  • Shannon K. MartinEmail author
Concise Research Reports

INTRODUCTION

Geography is consistently cited as an important factor in residency applicant decision-making,1 but little is known about where students match into residency based on medical school of origin. We aimed to characterize geographic trends for US graduating allopathic seniors participating in the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP).

METHODS

De-identified NRMP data were obtained for all US graduating allopathic seniors participating in the 2011–2015 Main Residency Match® in all specialties. Data were grouped into four geographic regions and nine divisions based upon applicants’ medical schools using US census definitions (Fig.  1). “Home” region/division was defined as applicants matching into the same geographic region and division where their medical school was located. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were performed using Stata, controlling for year and using East North Central (ENC) division as the referent group. This study was exempted by the University...

Notes

Acknowledgements

Contributors: We would like to thank the National Resident Matching Program for collecting and providing the data utilized in the study, as well as for their contribution to the manuscript.

Prior presentations: Preliminary results of this work were presented as a poster presentation at the Department of Medicine Resident Research Day at the University of Chicago in March 2017, as a poster presentation at the Midwest Society of General Internal Medicine conference in Chicago, Illinois in September, 2017, and as an oral plenary presentation at the University of Chicago Medical Education Day in November 2017.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    National Resident Matching Program, Data Release and Research Committee: Results of the 2015 NRMP Applicant Survey by Preferred Specialty and Applicant Type. Washington, DC: National Residency Matching Program; 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Falcone JL. Home-field advantage: the role of selection bias in the general surgery national residency matching program. J Surg Educ. 2013;70(4):461–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Silvestre J, Lin IC, Serletti JM, Chang B. Geographic Trends in the Plastic Surgery Match. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(2):270–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson AP, Svider PF, Folbe AJ, et al. An evaluation of geographic trends in the otolaryngology residency match: home is where the heart is. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(5):424–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pereira AG, Chelminski PR, Chheda SG, et al. Application Inflation for Internal Medicine Applicants in the Match: Drivers, Consequences, and Potential Solutions. Am J Med. 2016;129(8):885–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claire N. Shappell
    • 1
  • Jeanne M. Farnan
    • 2
  • John F. McConville
    • 2
  • Shannon K. Martin
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Brigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medicine, Pritzker School of MedicineUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations