Racial Discrimination in Health Care and Utilization of Health Care: a Cross-sectional Study of California Adults
Racial and ethnic discrimination in health care have been associated with suboptimal use of health care. However, limited research has examined how facets of health care utilization influence, and are influenced by, discrimination.
This study aimed to determine if type of insurance coverage and location of usual source of care used were associated with perceptions of racial or ethnic discrimination in health care. Additionally, this study examined if perceived racial or ethnic discrimination influenced delaying or forgoing prescriptions or medical care.
Data from the 2015–2016 California Health Interview Survey were used. Logistic regression models estimated odds of perceiving racial or ethnic discrimination from insurance type and location of usual source of care. Logistic regression models estimated odds of delaying or forgoing medical care or prescriptions.
Responses for 39,171 adults aged 18 and over were used.
Key health care utilization variables were as follows: current insurance coverage, location of usual source of care, delaying or forgoing medical care, and delaying or forgoing prescriptions. We examined if these effects differed by race. Ever experiencing racial or ethnic discrimination in the health care setting functioned as a dependent and independent variable in analyses.
When insurance type and location of care were included in the same model, only the former was associated with perceived discrimination. Specifically, those with Medicaid had 66% higher odds of perceiving discrimination, relative to those with employer-sponsored coverage (AOR = 1.66; 95% CI 1.11, 2.47). Race did not moderate the impact of discrimination. Perceived discrimination was associated with higher odds of delaying or forgoing both prescriptions (AOR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.26, 3.09) and medical care (AOR = 1.84; 95% CI 1.31, 2.59).
Health care providers have an opportunity to improve the experiences of their patients, particularly those with publicly sponsored coverage.
KEY WORDShealth insurance race discrimination health care utilization
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest..
- 23.D'Anna LH, Stevens GD, Malotte CK, Tsai K-Y. Does Health Care Setting Matter in Reports of Discrimination? J Ambul Care Manage 2010;33(4):314–327.Google Scholar
- 24.Courtemanche C, Marton J, Ukert B, Yelowitz A, Zapata D. Early Impacts of the Affordable Care Act on Health Insurance Coverage in Medicaid Expansion and Non-Expansion States. J Policy Anal Manage 2017;36(1):178–210.Google Scholar
- 28.Alcalá HE, Roby DH, Grande DT, McKenna RM, Ortega AN. Insurance Type and Access to Health Care Providers and Appointments Under the Affordable Care Act. Med Care. 2017.Google Scholar
- 31.Wehby GL, Lyu W. The Impact of the ACA Medicaid Expansions on Health Insurance Coverage through 2015 and Coverage Disparities by Age, Race/Ethnicity, and Gender. Health Serv Res. n/a-n/a.Google Scholar
- 33.California Health Interview Survey. Report 1: Sample Design. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2016.Google Scholar
- 40.Terhune C. Covered California aims to kick out poor-performing hospitals. 2016. http://www.scpr.org/news/2016/03/18/58667/covered-california-aims-to-kick-out-poor-performin/. Accessed 22 June 2017.
- 41.Ibarra AB, Gorn D. Covered California Imposes New Quality, Cost Conditions On Health Plans. 2016. https://ww2.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2016/04/08/covered-california-imposes-new-quality-cost-conditions-on-health-plans/. Accessed 27 Dec 2017.