Advertisement

Cost Conversations Between Primary Care Providers and Patients with Expanded Medicaid Coverage

  • Renuka Tipirneni
  • Minal R. Patel
  • Matthias A. Kirch
  • Susan D. Goold
Concise Research Reports

INTRODUCTION

Patients face increasing out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for healthcare,1 which have been associated with medication non-adherence and poor health outcomes.2, 3 While low-income patients may frequently have concerns about OOP costs—even if they have insurance with generous covered benefits—they may not raise cost concerns with physicians. Little is known about cost conversations between primary care providers (PCPs) and low-income patients. Our objective was to determine the frequency, predictors, and PCPs’ perceptions of the impact of cost conversations with low-income patients in an expanded Medicaid program in Michigan (“Healthy Michigan Plan” [HMP]), a state program for adults ages 19–64 with incomes ≤ 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL) and includes limited cost-sharing for beneficiaries (≤ 2% of income).

METHODS

We conducted a mailed survey of all PCPs caring for ≥ 12 HMP patients in June–November 2015. The sample was derived from the Michigan Department of Health and...

KEY WORDS

out-of-pocket costs health insurance medicaid physician-patient communication 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of other evaluation team members who contributed to survey development and administration including Eric G. Campbell, PhD; John Z. Ayanian, MD MPP; Cengiz Salman, MA; Sarah J. Clark, MPH; Tammy Chang, MD MPH MS; Adrianne N. Haggins, MD MSc; Edith C. Kieffer, PhD; Lisa Szymecko, JD PhD; Sunghee Lee, PhD; Erica Solway, PhD MPH MSW; Erin Beathard, MPH MSW; and Zachary Rowe, BS.

FUNDING INFORMATION

The study was funded by a contract from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) to the University of Michigan to conduct an evaluation of the Healthy Michigan Plan, as required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) through a Section 1115 Medicaid waiver.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of MDHHS or CMS.

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Paez KA, Zhao L, Hwang W. Rising out-of-pocket spending for chronic conditions: a ten-year trend. Health Aff. 2009;28(1):15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patel MR, Piette JD, Resnicow K, Kowalski-Dobson T, Heisler M. Social Determinants of Health, Cost-related Nonadherence, and Cost-reducing Behaviors Among Adults With Diabetes: Findings From the National Health Interview Survey. Med Care. 2016;54(8):796–803.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heisler M, Choi H, Rosen AB, et al. Hospitalizations and deaths among adults with cardiovascular disease who underuse medications because of cost: a longitudinal analysis. Med Care. 2010;48(2):87–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hunter WG, Hesson A, Davis JK, et al. Patient-physician discussions about costs: definitions and impact on cost conversation incidence estimates. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alexander GC, Casalino LP, Meltzer DO. Patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs. JAMA. 2003;290(7):953–958.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Piette JD, Heisler M, Wagner TH. Cost-related medication underuse: do patients with chronic illnesses tell their doctors? Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(16):1749–1755.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renuka Tipirneni
    • 1
    • 2
  • Minal R. Patel
    • 1
    • 3
  • Matthias A. Kirch
    • 1
  • Susan D. Goold
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute for Healthcare Policy and InnovationUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.School of Public HealthUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations