Racial/Gender Biases in Student Clinical Decision-Making: a Mixed-Method Study of Medical School Attributes Associated with Lower Incidence of Biases
Accumulating evidence suggests that clinician racial/gender decision-making biases in some instances contribute to health disparities. Previous work has produced evidence of such biases in medical students.
To identify contextual attributes in medical schools associated on average with low levels of racial/gender clinical decision-making biases.
A mixed-method design using comparison case studies of 15 medical schools selected based on results of a previous survey of student decision-making bias: 7 schools whose students collectively had, and 8 schools whose students had not shown evidence of such biases.
Purposively sampled faculty, staff, underrepresented minority medical students, and clinical-level medical students at each school.
Quantitative descriptive data and qualitative interview and focus group data assessing 32 school attributes theorized in the literature to be associated with formation of decision-making and biases. We used a mixed-method analytic design with standard qualitative analysis and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis.
Across the 15 schools, a total of 104 faculty, administrators and staff and 21 students participated in individual interviews, and 196 students participated in 29 focus groups. While no single attribute or group of attributes distinguished the two clusters of schools, analysis showed some contextual attributes were seen more commonly in schools whose students had not demonstrated biases: longitudinal reflective small group sessions; non-accusatory approach to training in diversity; longitudinal, integrated diversity curriculum; admissions priorities and action steps toward a diverse student body; and school service orientation to the community.
We identified several potentially modifiable elements of the training environment that are more common in schools whose students do not show evidence of racial and gender biases.
KEY WORDSstudents medical decision-making healthcare disparities
The authors wish to thank Lee Green, MD, MPH, for consultation with the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis, and Denise Ruybal for untiring and unflappable administrative support.
Research reported in this paper was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers R01MD006073 and P20MD004811.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The findings of this study have been presented in part or in whole at the following conferences: (1) 13th Annual AAMC Health Workforce Research Conference. Arlington, VA, May 2017; (2) Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting. Washington DC, April 2017; (3) Society of Teachers of Family Medicine Conference on Medical Student Education. Anaheim, CA, February 2017; (4) 43rd Annual meeting of North American Primary Care Research Group, Cancun, Mexico, November 2015.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
- 1.Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003.Google Scholar
- 2.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2016 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr16/index.html. Accessed April 24, 2018.
- 4.Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Minority Health and RAND Corporation. Racial and ethnic disparities by gender in health care in Medicare Advantage. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/OMH/Downloads/Health-Disparities-Racial-and-Ethnic-Disparities-by-Gender-National-Report.pdf. Accessed April 24, 2018.
- 23.Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a medical school: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree. Standard 7.6 Cultural competence and health care Disparities. Available at: http://lcme.org/publications/. Accessed April 24, 2018.
- 24.Association of American Medical Colleges. Assessing Change: Evaluating Cultural Competence Education and Training. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/download/427350/data/assessingchange.pdf . Accessed April 24, 2018.
- 25.Addison RB. A grounded hermeneutic editing approach. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, editors. Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd Ed. Thousand Hills, CA: Sage; 1999:145–61.Google Scholar
- 27.Project Implicit. Implicit Association Test. Available at: https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html. Accessed April 24, 2018.