Advertisement

Update on the Durability and Performance of Collis Gastroplasty For Chronic GERD and Hiatal Hernia Repair At 4-Year Post-Intervention

  • Richard Lu
  • Alex Addo
  • Andrew Broda
  • Zachary Sanford
  • Adam Weltz
  • H. Reza Zahiri
  • Adrian ParkEmail author
2019 SSAT Plenary Presentation

Abstract

Background

Collis gastroplasty (CG) remains an important procedure to lengthen the esophagus when indicated in patients undergoing fundoplication for longstanding refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or large hiatal hernias. Concerns over potential sequelae of CG such as dysphagia and worsening heartburn as well as questions regarding the durability of the procedure remain a subject of debate. In this study, 3 and 4-year postoperative data is presented assessing patient quality of life (QOL) measures for those undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) with and without CG.

Methods

Comparative review of a prospectively maintained GERD patient database was conducted between patients undergoing LARS with CG versus non-CG (NC) at two institutions between October 2004 and February 2019. Patient demographic, perioperative, and QOL data was analyzed at 3 and 4 years postoperatively using four validated instruments: the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Laryngopharyngeal Reflux QOL (LPR-QOL), Swallowing QOL (SWAL), and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQOL) surveys.

Results

A total of 214 CG and 798 NC patients were included in this study. The CG group was older (66.1 ± 12.9 vs. 59.0 ± 14.1, p < 0.001), had a higher frequency of ASA class 3 patients (39.7% vs. 29.7%), and had greater proportion of comorbid disease compared to NG. The groups were parallel in BMI (Collis 28.4 ± 5.2 kg/m2 vs. non-Collis 28.6 ± 5.3 kg/m2, p = 0.673). Subset analysis revealed persistent benefits through 4 years reflected by survey results in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in QOL outcomes between CG and NC. A majority of patients in both groups reported discontinuation of antireflux medications and satisfaction with surgical outcomes and symptom control.

Conclusion

Long-term QOL outcomes after laparoscopic CG are comparable to patients treated with fundoplication alone in cases of long-standing GERD and hiatal hernias. Furthermore, CG patients enjoyed equivalent durability of the procedure without risk of subsequent dysphagia. Collis gastroplasty remains an important tool in the armamentarium of foregut surgeons.

Keywords

Collis gastroplasty shortened esophagus mediastinal dissection Nissen fundoplication fundoplasty hiatal hernia paraesophageal hernia neoesophagus neofundus 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Horvath KD, Swanstrom LL, Jobe BA. The short esophagus: Pathophysiology, incidence, presentation, and treatment in the era of laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Ann Surg. 2000;232(5):630-640. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200011000-00003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bochkarev V, Lee YK, Vitamvas M, Oleynikov D. Short esophagus: How much length can we get? Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2008;22(10):2123-2127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9999-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madan AK, Frantzides CT, Patsavas KL. The myth of the short esophagus. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8611-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mattioli S, Lugaresi ML, Costantini M, et al. The short esophagus: Intraoperative assessment of esophageal length. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Durand L, De Antón R, Caracoche M, et al. Short esophagus: Selection of patients for surgery and long-term results. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(3):704-713. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1940-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garg N, Yano F, Filipi CJ, Mittal SK. Long-term symptomatic outcomes after Collis gastroplasty with fundoplication. Dis Esophagus. 2009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00943.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mor A, Lutfi R, Torquati A. Esophageal acid-clearance physiology is altered after Nissen-Collis gastroplasty. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(4):1334-1338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2609-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nason KS, Luketich JD, Awais O, et al. Quality of life after Collis gastroplasty for short esophagus in patients with paraesophageal hernia. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.06.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Youssef YK, Shekar N, Lutfi R, Richards WO, Torquati A. Long-term evaluation of patient satisfaction and reflux symptoms after laparoscopic fundoplication with Collis gastroplasty. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0048-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lugaresi M, Mattioli B, Perrone O, Daddi N, Di Simone MP, Mattioli S. Results of left thoracoscopic Collis gastroplasty with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the surgical treatment of true short oesophagus in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and Type III-IV hiatal hernia. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv381 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O’Rourke RW. Extended Transmediastinal Dissection. Arch Surg. 2003;138(7):735. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.7.735 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weltz AS, Zahiri HR, Sibia US, Wu N, Fantry GT, Park AE. Patients are well served by Collis gastroplasty when indicated. Surg (United States). 2017;162(3):568-576. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park AE, Hoogerboord CM, Sutton E. Use of the Falciform Ligament Flap for Closure of the Esophageal Hiatus in Giant Paraesophageal Hernia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1888-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McHorney CA, Robbins JA, Lomax K, et al. The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-001-0109-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carrau RL, Khidr A, Gold KF, et al. Validation of a quality-of-life instrument for laryngopharyngeal reflux. Arch Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.4.315 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Velanovich V. The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus. 2007. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00658.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00097-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richardson JD, Larson GM, Polk HC. Intrathoracic fundoplication for shortened esophagus. Treacherous solution to a challenging problem. Am J Surg. 1982. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(82)90125-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Collis JL. Gastroplasty. Br Med J. 1962;1(5279):722. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.5279.722-a CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Swanstrom LL, Marcus DR, Galloway GQ. Laparoscopic Collis gastroplasty is the treatment of choice for the shortened esophagus. Am J Surg. 1996;171(5):477-481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00008-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peters JH. SAGES guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(12):4407-4408. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3212-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zehetner J, DeMeester SR, Ayazi S, Kilday P, Alicuben ET, DeMeester TR. Laparoscopic wedge fundectomy for collis gastroplasty creation in patients with a foreshortened esophagus. Ann Surg. 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ritter MP, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, et al. Treatment of advanced gastroesophageal reflux disease with collis gastroplasty and belsey partial fundoplication. Arch Surg. 1998. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.133.5.523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jobe BA, Horvath KD, Swanstrom LL. Postoperative function following laparoscopic Collis gastroplasty for shortened esophagus. Arch Surg. 1998. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.133.8.867 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Richardson JD, Richardson RL. Collis-Nissen gastroplasty for shortened esophagus: Long-term evaluation. In: Annals of Surgery. ; 1998. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199805000-00014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen LQ, Ferraro P, Martin J, Duranceau AC. Antireflux surgery for Barrett’s esophagus: Comparative results of the Nissen and Collis-Nissen operations. Dis Esophagus. 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2005.00507.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Testart J, Kartheuser A, Peillon C, Galmiche JP, Denis P. [Collis’s operation for brachyesophagus. (49 patients)]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Lu
    • 1
  • Alex Addo
    • 1
  • Andrew Broda
    • 1
  • Zachary Sanford
    • 1
  • Adam Weltz
    • 1
  • H. Reza Zahiri
    • 1
  • Adrian Park
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryAnne Arundel Medical CenterAnnapolisUSA
  2. 2.Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations