Therapeutic Role of Water-Soluble Contrast Media in Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a common post-operative cause of hospitalisation. Water-soluble contrast media (WSCM) has become a popular non-surgical approach to treatment. However, previous reviews have concluded with conflicting results. This meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) re-evaluated the therapeutic value of WSCM in the management of ASBO.
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was undertaken to identify RCTs from January 2000 to November 2018. The primary outcomes of length of stay and secondary outcomes of time to resolution, need for surgery, and mortality were extracted from the included studies. Quantitative pooling of the data was based on the random effects model.
Eight hundred and seventy-nine patients from the nine studies were included in the analysis. The administration of oral WSCM reduced the length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference − 0.15 days, P < 0.0001). However, WSCM does not reduce the need for surgery (relative risk 0.84, P < 0.009) and makes no difference to mortality rate (RR 0.99, P < 1.000). The definition of time to resolution of ASBO differed between the studies, ranging from time to passing flatus, to cessation of abdominal pain, and time to initiating oral intake. The significant differences in definition precluded meaningful quantitative pooling of this outcome.
This meta-analysis evaluating the therapeutic value of WSCM has shown that it does not reduce the need for operative management in ASBO or impact mortality rates. It shortens hospital stay by 0.15 days (3.6 h) which is not clinically significant.
KeywordsSmall bowel obstruction Gastrografin Conservative management
Study conception and design: BB, MKM, AA, AK, AC
Data collection: AK, AA
Data analysis: AA, AK
Data interpretation: AK, AA
Writing of manuscript: AK, AA, AC, BB, MKM
Creation of figures: AA, AK
Critical review of manuscript: AK, AC, BB, MKM
Final approval: AK, AA, AC, MKM, BB
AA is funded by an NIHR Academic Clinical fellowship.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Ten Broek R, Krielen P, Di Saverio S, Coccolini F, Biffl W, Ansaloni L, Velmahos GC, Sartelli M, Fraga GP, Kelly MD, Moore FA, Peitzman AB, Leppaniemi A, Moore EE, Jeekel J, Kluger Y, Sugrue M, Balogh ZJ, Bendinelli C, Civil I, Coimbra R, De Moya M, Ferrada P, Inaba K, Ivatury R, Latifi R, Kashuk JL, Kirkpatrick AW, Maier R, Rizoli S, Sakakushev B, Scalea T, Søreide K, Weber D, Wani I, Abu-Zidan FM, De’Angelis N, Piscioneri F, Galante JM, Catena F, van Goor H. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2018; 13(24).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Di Saverio S, Coccolini F, Galati M, Smerieri N, Biffl WL, Ansaloni L, Tugnoli G, Velmahos GC, Sartelli M, Bendinelli C, Fraga GP, Kelly MD, Moore FA, Mandalà V, Mandalà S, Masetti M, Jovine E, Pinna AD, Peitzman AB, Leppaniemi A, Sugarbaker PH, Goor HV, Moore EE, Jeekel J, Catena F. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World J Emerg Surg. 2013; 8(1): p. 42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Scotté M, Mauvais F, Bubenheim M, Cossé C, Suaud L, Savoye-Collet C, Plenier I, Péquignot A, Yzet T, Regimbeau JM. Use of water-soluble contrast medium (gastrografin) does not decrease the need for operative intervention nor the duration of hospital stay in uncomplicated acute adhesive small bowel obstruction? A multicenter, randomized, clinical trial (Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction Study) and systematic review. Surgery. 2017; 161(5): p. 1315–1325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Patel R, Borad N, Merchant A. Comparison of outcomes following laparoscopic and open treatment of emergent small bowel obstruction: an 11-year analysis of ACS NSQIP. Surg Endosc. 2018.Google Scholar
- 22.Lee M, Sayers A, Drake T, Hollyman M, Bradburn M, Hind D, Wilson TR, Fearnhead NS. UK-based, multisite, prospective cohort study of small bowel obstruction in acute surgical services: National Audit of Small Bowel Obstruction (NASBO) protocol. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(10): p. e016796.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Maung A, Johnson D, Piper G, Barbosa R, Rowell S, Bokhari F, Collins JN, Gordon JR, Ra JH, Kerwin AJ; Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Evaluation and management of small-bowel obstruction: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73(5 Suppl 4): p. S362–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Alwan M, van Rij A, Greig S. Postoperative adhesive small bowel obstruction: the resources impacts. The New Zealand medical journal. 1999; 112(1099): p. 421–423.Google Scholar
- 31.Zielinski M, Haddad N, Cullinane D, Inaba K, Yeh D, Wydo S, Turay D, Pakula A, Duane TM, Watras J, Widom KA, Cull J, Rodriguez CJ, Toschlog EA, Sams VG, Hazelton JP, Graybill JC, Skinner R, Yune JM. Multi-institutional, prospective, observational study comparing the Gastrografin challenge versus standard treatment in adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017; 83(1): p. 47–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar