Advertisement

A Novel Strategy of Laparoscopic Insufflation Rate Improving Shoulder Pain: Prospective Randomized Study

  • Kuo-Feng Hsu
  • Cheng-Jueng Chen
  • Jyh-Cherng Yu
  • Si-Yuan Wu
  • Bao-Chung Chen
  • Chih-Wei Yang
  • Teng-Wei Chen
  • Chung-Bao Hsieh
  • De-Chuan Chan
Original Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic surgery is the main trend method in a variety of surgical fields. Post-operative shoulder pain remains a bothersome issue although many surgical techniques have been applied to minimize it. A simple novel approach to reduce shoulder pain without adverse effects during and after laparoscopic surgery is desired.

Methods

This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to enroll a total of 140 patients to evaluate the efficacy of low flow rate (1 L/min) for induction followed by high flow rate (10 L/min) for maintaining 12 mmHg pneumoperitoneum (group A, n = 70) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), compared to the continuous high flow rate group (group B, n = 70) in postoperative shoulder pain and other clinical features. The 10-visual analog scale (VAS) was applied for the severity of shoulder pain and scores were obtained at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after LC.

Results

There was no obvious difference in baseline characteristics as well as operative time, occurrence of bradycardia, or hospital stay between groups. The incidence of shoulder pain was not significantly different (group A 45.7% vs group B 48.6%, p = 0.866). However, the patients in group A with shoulder pain reported significantly less pain scores (p < 0.001) at 12 and 24 h after surgery, compared with those in group B.

Conclusions

Applying the strategy of low flow rate to induce pneumoperitoneum followed by high flow rate to maintain the pressure provides advantages to reduce the severity of shoulder pain for patients who underwent LC and then experienced shoulder pain.

Keywords

Insufflation rate Laparoscopy Shoulder pain 

Notes

Author Contributions

1. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: De-Chuan Chan, Cheng-Jueng Chen, and Jyh-Cherng Yu

2. Material support: Teng-Wei Chen, Chung-Bao Hsieh, and De-Chuan Chan

3. Study concept and design and analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, statistical analysis, and writing: Kuo-Feng Hsu, Si-Yuan Wu, Bao-Chung Chen, and Chih-Wei Yang

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All patients (64 men and 76 women) between 19 and 84 years of age (mean age, 56.9 years) were blinded and randomly divided into low flow rate (1 L/min) for induction followed by high flow rate (10 L/min) for maintaining 12 mmHg pneumoperitoneum (group A, n = 70) and the continuous high flow rate group (group B, n = 70) by computer-based sequential allocation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Buia A, Stockhausen F, Hanisch E. Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review. World J Methodol. 2015;5(4):238–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v5.i4.238.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harrell AG, Heniford BT. Minimally invasive abdominal surgery: lux et veritas past, present, and future. Am J Surg. 2005;190(2):239–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Himal HS. Minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(12):1647–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-8275-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kandil TS, El Hefnawy E. Shoulder pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: factors affecting the incidence and severity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20(8):677–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2010.0112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donatsky AM, Bjerrum F, Gogenur I. Surgical techniques to minimize shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(7):2275–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2759-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Slim K, Pezet D, Stencl J, Jr., Lechner C, Le Roux S, Lointier P et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-trocar technique. World J Surg. 1995;19(3):394–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180(1):101–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roumm AR, Pizzi L, Goldfarb NI, Cohn H. Minimally invasive: minimally reimbursed? An examination of six laparoscopic surgical procedures. Surg Innov. 2005;12(3):261–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/155335060501200313.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sandhu T, Yamada S, Ariyakachon V, Chakrabandhu T, Chongruksut W, Ko-iam W. Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum versus standard pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(5):1044–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0119-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tsimoyiannis EC, Siakas P, Tassis A, Lekkas ET, Tzourou H, Kambili M. Intraperitoneal normal saline infusion for postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 1998;22(8):824–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nyerges A. Pain Mechanisms in Laparoscopic Surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg. 1994;1(4):215–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/SLAS00100215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nursal TZ, Yildirim S, Tarim A, Noyan T, Poyraz P, Tuna N et al. Effect of drainage on postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003;388(2):95–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-003-0374-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hawasli A, Brown E. The effect of drains in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994;4(6):393–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lindgren L, Koivusalo AM, Kellokumpu I. Conventional pneumoperitoneum compared with abdominal wall lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. 1995;75(5):567–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koivusalo AM, Kellokumpu I, Lindgren L. Gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of postoperative recovery with conventional technique. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77(5):576–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barczynski M, Herman RM. A prospective randomized trial on comparison of low-pressure (LP) and standard-pressure (SP) pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(4):533–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-9121-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR. Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009(2):CD006930. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006930.pub2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yasir M, Mehta KS, Banday VH, Aiman A, Masood I, Iqbal B. Evaluation of post operative shoulder tip pain in low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgeon. 2012;10(2):71–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2011.02.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jorgensen JO, Gillies RB, Hunt DR, Caplehorn JR, Lumley T. A simple and effective way to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;65(7):466–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Atak I, Ozbagriacik M, Akinci OF, Bildik N, Subasi IE, Ozdemir M et al. Active gas aspiration to reduce pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011;21(2):98–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e318213c301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Uchiyama K, Tani M, Kawai M, Terasawa H, Hama T, Yamaue H. Clinical significance of drainage tube insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(6):551–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-007-1221-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aitola P, Airo I, Kaukinen S, Ylitalo P. Comparison of N2O and CO2 pneumoperitoneums during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with special reference to postoperative pain. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8(2):140–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Daskalakis M, Scheffel O, Weiner RA. High flow insufflation for the maintenance of the pneumoperitoneum during bariatric surgery. Obes Facts. 2009;2 Suppl 1:37–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000198252.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Berberoglu M, Dilek ON, Ercan F, Kati I, Ozmen M. The effect of CO2 insufflation rate on the postlaparoscopic shoulder pain. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998;8(5):273–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.1998.8.273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kuo-Feng Hsu
    • 1
  • Cheng-Jueng Chen
    • 1
  • Jyh-Cherng Yu
    • 1
  • Si-Yuan Wu
    • 1
  • Bao-Chung Chen
    • 2
  • Chih-Wei Yang
    • 2
  • Teng-Wei Chen
    • 1
  • Chung-Bao Hsieh
    • 1
  • De-Chuan Chan
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General HospitalNational Defense Medical CenterTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General HospitalNational Defense Medical CenterTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations