Advertisement

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 1044–1054 | Cite as

Is Resection of Primary Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Liver Disease Justified? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Diamantis I. Tsilimigras
  • Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
  • Ioannis D. Kostakis
  • Demetrios Moris
  • Dimitrios Schizas
  • Jordan M. Cloyd
  • Timothy M. PawlikEmail author
Review Article

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors (MNETs) frequently present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Although combined resection of the primary MNET and liver metastases (NELM) is usually recommended for appropriate surgical candidates, primary tumor resection (PTR) in the setting of extensive, inoperable metastatic disease remains controversial.

Methods

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines utilizing Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane library—Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases until September 30, 2018.

Results

Among patients with MNET and NELM, 1226 (68.4%; range, 35.5–85.1% per study) underwent PTR, whereas 567 (31.6%; range, 14.9–64.5%) patients did not. Median follow-up ranged from 55 to 90 months. Cytoreductive liver surgery was performed in approximately 15.7% (range, 0–34.8%) of patients. Pooled 5-year overall survival (OS) among the resected group was approximately 73.1% (range, 57–81%) versus 36.6% (range, 21–46%) for the non-resection group. For patients without liver debulking surgery, PTR remained associated with a decreased risk of death at 5 years compared with patients who did not have the primary tumor resected (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.79, p = 0.01; I2 58%, p = 0.12). For patients undergoing PTR, 30-day postoperative mortality ranged from 1.43 to 2%.

Conclusion

PTR was safe with a low peri-operative risk of mortality and was associated with an improved OS for patients with MNET and unresectable NELM. Given the poor quality of evidence, however, strong evidenced-based recommendations cannot be made based on these retrospective single center–derived data. Future well-design randomized controlled trials will be critical in elucidating the optimal treatment strategies for patients with MNET and advanced metastatic disease.

Keywords

Carcinoid Mesenteric mass Palliative resection Neuroendocrine liver metastases Survival Small bowel resection 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11605_2018_4094_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 13 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Hauso O, Gustafsson BI, Kidd M, et al. Neuroendocrine tumor epidemiology: contrasting Norway and North America. Cancer 2008; 113(10): 2655–64.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moris D, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Tsilimigras DI, et al. Update on Surgical Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors. Anticancer Res 2018; 38(3): 1267–78.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Niederle MB, Hackl M, Kaserer K, Niederle B. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: the current incidence and staging based on the WHO and European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society classification: an analysis based on prospectively collected parameters. Endocr Relat Cancer 2010; 17(4): 909–18.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu L, Fu J, Wan L, et al. Survival outcomes and surgical intervention of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors: a population based retrospective study. Oncotarget 2017; 8(3): 4935–47.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Loon K, Zhang L, Keiser J, et al. Bone metastases and skeletal-related events from neuroendocrine tumors. Endocr Connect 2015; 4(1): 9–17.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ejaz A, Reames BN, Maithel S, et al. Cytoreductive debulking surgery among patients with neuroendocrine liver metastasis: a multi-institutional analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2018; 20(3): 277–84.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hodul P, Malafa M, Choi J, Kvols L. The role of cytoreductive hepatic surgery as an adjunct to the management of metastatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. Cancer Control 2006; 13(1): 61–71.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jann H, Roll S, Couvelard A, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors of midgut and hindgut origin: tumor-node-metastasis classification determines clinical outcome. Cancer 2011; 117(15): 3332–41.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O'Toole D, Kianmanesh R, Caplin M. ENETS 2016 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Digestive Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Update. Neuroendocrinology 2016; 103(2): 117–8.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Akerstrom G, Hellman P, Hessman O, Osmak L. Management of midgut carcinoids. J Surg Oncol 2005; 89(3): 161–9.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Capurso G, Rinzivillo M, Bettini R, Boninsegna L, Delle Fave G, Falconi M. Systematic review of resection of primary midgut carcinoid tumour in patients with unresectable liver metastases. Br J Surg 2012; 99(11): 1480–6.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62(10): 1006–12.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med 1998; 17(24): 2815–34.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laskaratos FM, Walker M, Wilkins D, et al. Evaluation of clinical prognostic factors and further delineation of the effect of mesenteric fibrosis on survival in advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumours. Neuroendocrinology 2018;107(3): 292–304Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lewis A, Raoof M, Ituarte PHG, et al. Resection of the Primary Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor Improves Survival with or without Liver Treatment. Ann Surg 2018Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Norlen O, Stalberg P, Oberg K, et al. Long-term results of surgery for small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors at a tertiary referral center. World J Surg 2012; 36(6): 1419–31.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ahmed A, Turner G, King B, et al. Midgut neuroendocrine tumours with liver metastases: results of the UKINETS study. Endocr Relat Cancer 2009; 16(3): 885–94.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Strosberg J, Gardner N, Kvols L. Survival and prognostic factor analysis of 146 metastatic neuroendocrine tumors of the mid-gut. Neuroendocrinology 2009; 89(4): 471–6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    van der Horst-Schrivers AN, Post WJ, Kema IP, et al. Persistent low urinary excretion of 5-HIAA is a marker for favourable survival during follow-up in patients with disseminated midgut carcinoid tumours. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43(18): 2651–7.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Givi B, Pommier SJ, Thompson AK, Diggs BS, Pommier RF. Operative resection of primary carcinoid neoplasms in patients with liver metastases yields significantly better survival. Surgery 2006; 140(6): 891–7; discussion 7-8.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Soreide O, Berstad T, Bakka A, et al. Surgical treatment as a principle in patients with advanced abdominal carcinoid tumors. Surgery 1992; 111(1): 48–54.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Daskalakis K, Karakatsanis A, Hessman O, et al. Association of a Prophylactic Surgical Approach to Stage IV Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors With Survival. JAMA Oncol 2018; 4(2): 183–9.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Srirajaskanthan R, Ahmed A, Prachialias A, et al. ENETS TNM Staging Predicts Prognosis in Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumours. ISRN Oncol 2013; 2013: 420795.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hellman P, Lundstrom T, Ohrvall U, et al. Effect of surgery on the outcome of midgut carcinoid disease with lymph node and liver metastases. World J Surg 2002; 26(8): 991–7.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Howe JR, Cardona K, Fraker DL, et al. The Surgical Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors: Consensus Guidelines of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. Pancreas 2017; 46(6): 715–31.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xiang JX, Zhang XF, Beal EW, et al. Hepatic Resection for Non-functional Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis: Does the Presence of Unresected Primary Tumor or Extrahepatic Metastatic Disease Matter? Ann Surg Oncol 2018Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Niederle B, Pape UF, Costa F, et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Jejunum and Ileum. Neuroendocrinology 2016; 103(2): 125–38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical OncologyThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research InstituteColumbusUSA
  2. 2.School of MedicineNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece
  3. 3.Department of TransplantationGuy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  5. 5.Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, Oncology, Health Services Management and PolicyThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations