Advertisement

Minimally Invasive Approach in the Setting of ALPPS Procedure: a Systematic Review of the Literature

  • Fabio Melandro
  • Francesco Giovanardi
  • Redan Hassan
  • Zoe Larghi Laureiro
  • Flaminia Ferri
  • Massimo Rossi
  • Gianluca Mennini
  • Timothy M. Pawlik
  • Quirino LaiEmail author
Review Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) represents a new surgical technique for the resection of advanced hepatic malignancies with predicted insufficient future liver remnant. In some patients, ALPPS can be associated with an increased risk of poor outcomes. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been proposed in combination with ALPPS with the intent to minimize this risk. We systematically evaluated the outcomes of MIS-ALPPS cases to compare the relative outcomes of open ALPPS versus MIS-ALPPS.

Methods

A systematic review was done in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Search terms utilized included the following: (“ALPPS”[Title/Abstract] OR “associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy”[Title/Abstract] OR “in situ split”[Title/Abstract]) AND (“minimally invasive”[Title/Abstract] OR “laparoscopic”[Title/Abstract] OR “robotic”[Title/Abstract]).

Results

Fifteen articles were identified, with a total of 27 patients reported. Colorectal metastatic disease was the most commonly observed indication for MIS-ALPPS (66.7%), followed by hepatocellular carcinoma (25.9%). Time passed from the first to the second stage ranged 7–30 days. MIS-ALPPS patients did not experience procedure failures between the first and second stages. Only four (15.4%) subjects had a grade IIIb complication. No perioperative mortality after the first or second stage was reported. Compared with open ALPPS, MIS-ALPPS demonstrated better results. Hospital stay duration ranged 8–33 days with a follow-up ranging 1–20 months.

Conclusions

MIS-ALPPS appears to be safe, with potentially lower morbidities and mortalities relative to open patients. The present results should be considered with caution. A limited number of articles exist on this topic. Furthermore, selection biases exist when comparing open versus MIS-ALPPS data. Registry studies are needed to better define the outcomes of patients undergoing MIS-ALPPS.

Keywords

Minimally invasive Laparoscopic Robotic ALPPS 

Abbreviations

ALPPS

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy

CRLM

Colorectal liver metastases

HCC

Hepatocellular carcinoma

hCCA

Hilar cholangiocellular cancer

MIS

Minimally invasive surgery

NOS

Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale

PRISMA

Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

RALPP

Radiofrequency-assisted liver partitions with portal vein embolization for staged hepatectomy

sFLR

Standardized future liver remnant

Notes

Contributors

FM, FG, QL, and TMP designed the research; FM, FG, QL, and TMP collected and interpreted the data; FM, FG, QL, and TMP wrote the paper; RH, ZLL, FF, MR, and GM critically revised the paper; all the authors gave final approval of the article to be published.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H, Nadalin S, Baumgart J, Farkas SA, Fichtner-Feigl S, Lorf T, Goralcyk A, Hörbelt R, Kroemer A, Loss M, Rümmele P, Scherer MN, Padberg W, Königsrainer A, Lang H, Obed A, Schlitt HJ. Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg 2012;255:405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eshmuminov D, Tschuor C, Raptis DA, Boss A, Wurnig MC, Sergeant G, Schadde E, Clavien PA. Rapid liver volume increase induced by associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): Is it edema, steatosis, or true proliferation? Surgery 2017;161:1549–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Linecker M, Kron P, Lang H, de Santibañes E, Clavien PA. Too Many Languages in the ALPPS: Preventing Another Tower of Babel? Ann Surg 2016;263:837–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Olthof PB, Schnitzbauer AA, Schadde E. The HPB controversy of the decade: 2007-2017 - Ten years of ALPPS. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018 Jun 18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.06.005.
  5. 5.
    Schadde E, Ardiles V, Robles-Campos R, Malago M, Machado M, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Soubrane O, Schnitzbauer AA, Raptis D, Tschuor C, Petrowsky H, De Santibanes E, Clavien PA; ALPPS Registry Group. Early survival and safety of ALPPS: first report of the International ALPPS Registry. Ann Surg 2014;260:829–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tschuor Ch, Croome KP, Sergeant G, Cano V, Schadde E, Ardiles V, Slankamenac K, Clariá RS, de Santibaňes E, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Clavien PA. Salvage parenchymal liver transection for patients with insufficient volume increase after portal vein occlusion - an extension of the ALPPS approach. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39:1230–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eshmuminov D, Raptis DA, Linecker M, Wirsching A, Lesurtel M, Clavien PA. Meta-analysis of associating liver partition with portal vein ligation and portal vein occlusion for two-stage hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2016;103:1768–1782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adam R, Imai K, Castro Benitez C, Allard MA, Vibert E, Sa Cunha A, Cherqui D, Baba H, Castaing D. Outcome after associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy and conventional two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 2016;103:1521–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lai Q, Melandro F, Rossi M. Hybrid Partial ALPPS: a Feasible Approach in Case of Right Trisegmentectomy and Macrovascular Invasion. Ann Surg 2018;267:e80-e82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Linecker M, Stavrou GA, Oldhafer KJ, Jenner RM, Seifert B, Lurje G, Bednarsch J, Neumann U, Capobianco I, Nadalin S, Robles-Campos R, de Santibañes E, Malagó M, Lesurtel M, Clavien PA, Petrowsky H. The ALPPS Risk Score: Avoiding Futile Use of ALPPS. Ann Surg 2016;264:763–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Machado MA, Surjan RC, Bassères T, Makdissi FF. Totally laparoscopic ALPPS for multiple and bilobar colorectal metastases (with video). J Visc Surg 2017;54:131–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brustia R, Scatton O, Perdigao F, El-Mouhadi S, Cauchy F, Soubrane O. Vessel identifications tags for open or laparoscopic associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2013;217:e51-e55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cai X, Peng S, Duan L, Wang Y, Yu H, Li Z. Completely laparoscopic ALPPS using round-the-liver ligation to replace parenchymal transection for a patient with multiple right liver cancers complicated with liver cirrhosis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2014;24:883–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xiao L, Li JW, Zheng SG. Totally laparoscopic ALPPS in the treatment of cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2015;29:2800–2801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gringeri E, Boetto R, D’Amico FE, Bassi D, Cillo U. Laparoscopic microwave ablation and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (LAPS): a minimally invasive first-step approach. Ann Surg 2015;261:e42-e43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gall TM, Sodergren MH, Frampton AE, Fan R, Spalding DR, Habib NA, Pai M, Jackson JE, Tait P, Jiao LR. Radio-frequency-assisted Liver Partition with Portal vein ligation (RALPP) for liver regeneration. Ann Surg 2015;261:e45-e46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cillo U, Gringeri E, Feltracco P, Bassi D, D'Amico FE, Polacco M, Boetto R. Totally Laparoscopic Microwave Ablation and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy A New Minimally Invasive Two-Stage Hepatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:2787–2788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vicente E, Quijano Y, Ielpo B, Fabra I. First ALPPS procedure using a total robotic approach. Surg Oncol 2016;5:457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boggi U, Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Presti GL, Moglia A. Laparoscopic Microwave Liver Ablation and Portal Vein Ligation: An Alternative Approach to the Conventional ALPPS Procedure in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jiao LR, Hakim DN, Gall TM, Fajardo A, Pencavel TD, Fan R, Sodergren MH. A totally laparoscopic associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy assisted with radiofrequency (radiofrequency assisted liver partition with portal vein ligation) for staged liver resection. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2016;5:382–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Surjan RC, Makdissi FF, Basseres T, Leite D, Charles LF, Bezerra RO, Schadde E, Machado MA. First totally laparoscopic ALPPS procedure with selective hepatic artery clamping: Case report of a new technique. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e4236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Machado MA, Surjan R, Basseres T, Makdissi F. Total Laparoscopic Reversal ALPPS. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24:1048–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Machado MA, Makdissi FF, Surjan RC, Basseres T, Schadde E. Transition from open to laparoscopic ALPPS for patients with very small FLR: the initial experience. HPB (Oxford) 2017;19:59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rong Z, Lu Q, Yan J. Totally laparoscopic radiofrequency-assisted liver partition with portal vein ligation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic liver. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e9432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ha HT, Han YS, Chun JM. Totally laparoscopic associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy using anterior approach in HCC patient with Type II portal vein anomaly: a case report. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2017;21:217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pekolj J, Alvarez FA, Biagiola D, Villegas L, Ardiles V, de Santibañes E. Totally Laparoscopic Mini-ALPPS Using a Novel Approach of Laparoscopic-Assisted Transmesenteric Portal Vein Embolization. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018 Apr 16.  https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0039.
  27. 27.
    Beller EM, Glasziou PP, Altman DG, Hopewell S, Bastian H, Chalmers I, Gøtzsche PC, Lasserson T, Tovey D; PRISMA for Abstracts Group. PRISMA for abstracts: Reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts. PLoS Med 2012;10:e1001419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group; European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 2003;7:1–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ratti F, Cipriani F, Gagliano A, Catena M, Paganelli M, Aldrighetti L. Defining indications to ALPPS procedure: technical aspects and open issues. Updates Surg 2014;66:41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schnitzbauer AA, Schadde E, Linecker M, Machado MA, Adam R, Malago M, Clavien PA, de Santibanes E, Bechstein WO. Indicating ALPPS for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Critical Analysis of Patients in the International ALPPS Registry. Surgery. 2018 May 23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.02.026.
  32. 32.
    Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, Sanchez Claria R, Pekolj J, de Santibañes E. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): tips and tricks. J Gastrointest Surg 2013;17:814–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nadalin S, Capobianco I, Li J, Girotti P, Königsrainer I, Königsrainer A. Indications and limits for associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). Lessons Learned from 15 cases at a single centre. Z Gastroenterol 2014;52:35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Strasberg SM, Soper NJ. Management of choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era. Gastroenterology 1995;109:320–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O'Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D'Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS; World Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Surgery. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 2009;250:825–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Asbun H, O’Rourke N, Tanabe M, Koffron AJ, Tsung A, Soubrane O, Machado MA, Gayet B, Troisi RI, Pessaux P, Van Dam RM, Scatton O, Abu Hilal M, Belli G, Kwon CH, Edwin B, Choi GH, Aldrighetti LA, Cai X, Cleary S, Chen KH, Schön MR, Sugioka A, Tang CN, Herman P, Pekolj J, Chen XP, Dagher I, Jarnagin W, Yamamoto M, Strong R, Jagannath P, Lo CM, Clavien PA, Kokudo N, Barkun J, Strasberg SM. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 2015;261:619–629.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Imura S, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T, Morine Y, Wakabayashi G, Kaneko H. Current status of laparoscopic liver surgery in Japan: results of a multicenter Japanese experience. Surg Today 2014;44:1214–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Aldrighetti L, Ratti F, Cillo U, Ferrero A, Ettorre GM, Guglielmi A, Giuliante F, Calise F; Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (I GO MILS). Diffusion, outcomes and implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery: a snapshot from the I Go MILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) Registry. Updates Surg 2017;69:271–283.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kwon CHD, Choi GS, Kim JM, Cho CW, Rhu J, Kim GS, Sinn DH, Joh JW (2018) Results of consecutive 54 cases of purely laparoscopic donor hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation recipients. Liver Transpl. 2018 Jul 18.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25307.
  40. 40.
    Wu X, Huang Z, Lau WY, Li W, Lin P, Zhang L, Chen Y. Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with well-preserved liver function and cirrhotic background: a propensity score matching study. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul 9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6296-8.
  41. 41.
    Miyagi S, Nakanishi C, Hara Y, Kamei T, Kawagishi N, Ohuchi N. An evaluation of the safety of pure laparoscopic hepatectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: investigations including serum albumin and ascites. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2015;25:209–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cannon RM, Saggi B, Buell JF. Evaluation of a laparoscopic liver resection in the setting of cirrhosis. HPB (Oxford) 2014;16:164–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Serenari M, Zanello M, Schadde E, Toschi E, Ratti F, Gringeri E, Masetti M, Cillo U, Aldrighetti L, Jovine E; ALPPS Italian Registry Group. Importance of primary indication and liver function between stages: results of a multicenter Italian audit of ALPPS 2012-2014. HPB (Oxford) 2016;18:419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabio Melandro
    • 1
  • Francesco Giovanardi
    • 1
  • Redan Hassan
    • 1
  • Zoe Larghi Laureiro
    • 1
  • Flaminia Ferri
    • 2
  • Massimo Rossi
    • 1
  • Gianluca Mennini
    • 1
  • Timothy M. Pawlik
    • 3
  • Quirino Lai
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Hepato-bilio-pancreatic and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Umberto I Policlinic of RomeSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Umberto I Policlinic of RomeSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly
  3. 3.The Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusUSA
  4. 4.Department of General Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Umberto I Policlinic of RomeSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations