Simple 2D gravity–density inversion for the modeling of the basin basement: example from the Banat area, Serbia
We have developed a technique to calculate lateral density distribution of the sedimentary basin basement by combining linear gravity–density inversion and 2D forward modeling. The procedure requires gravity anomaly data, depth-to-basement data and density data for the sediments (density–depth distribution). Gravity effect of density variations in the basement was extracted from the total gravity anomaly by removing the joint effect of the sediments with vertical density variations and homogeneous basement of average density contrast (calculated by 2D modeling). Gravity effect of the sediments was calculated using depth-to-basement data and density–depth function, based on borehole logging data. Bouguer slab formula was used in order to simplify basement model and calculate the operator for the linear inversion of gravity effect of the basement into lateral density distribution. The results were tested by forward modeling, and differences between observed and modeled gravity data were used for the next iteration of the inversion and correction of density values in each point along the profile. The procedure was tested using synthetic models and field example, and both results were satisfying, especially taking into account the simplicity of the inversion technique. The main problem was the effect of abrupt changes in the basement topography on density distribution, but it was downsized by filtering. Basement density maps were compiled based upon the density distribution along the profiles.
KeywordsDensity functions Lateral density distribution Basement density map
The material from this paper has been presented at the CAGG2019 Conference. September 10–September 13, 2019. Study was supported by the Serbian Ministry of Education. Science and Technological Development (Projects No. 33003 and 176016).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Azad MR, Koneshloo M, Kamakar Rouhani A, Aghajani H (2016) Comparison of factorial kriging analysis method and upward continuation filter to recognize subsurface structures—a case study: gravity data from a hydrocarbon field in the southeast sedimentary basins of the East Vietnam Sea. Acta Geophys 64:398–416. https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2015-0068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bielik M, Krajňák M, Makarenko I, Legostaeva O, Starostenko VI, Bošanský M, Grinč M, Hók J (2013) 3D gravity interpretation of the pre-Tertiary basement in the intramontane depressions of the Western Carpathians: a case study from the Turiec Basin. Geol Carpath 64:399–408. https://doi.org/10.2478/geoca-2013-0027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bilibajkić P, Mladenović M, Mujagić S, Rimac I (1979) Explanation for the gravity map of SFR Yugoslavia—Bouguer anomalies—1:500 000. Federal Geological Institute, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
- Čanović M, Kemenci R (1988) The Mesozoik of the Pannonian basin in Vojvodina (Yugoslavia)—stratigraphy and facies, magmatism, paleogeography. Matica srpska, Novi SadGoogle Scholar
- Dolton GL (2006) Pannonian Basin Province, Central Europe (Province 4808) – Petroleum geology, total petroleum systems, and petroleum resource assessment, U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/2204/b/pdf/b2204-b_508.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2019
- Horváth F, Royden LH (1981) Mechanism for formation of the intra-Carpathian basins: a review. Earth Evol Sci 1:307–316Google Scholar
- Ioane D, Calota C, Ion D (2005) Deep geological structures as revealed by 3D gravity stripping: western part of the Moesian Platform, Romania. J Balkan Geophys Soc 8:129–138Google Scholar
- Kemenci R, Čanović M (1997) Geologic setting of the pre-tertiary basement in Vojvodina (Yugoslavia) part I: the Tisza Mega-unit of North Vojvodina. Acta Geol Hung 40:1–36Google Scholar
- Košćal M, Menković L, Mijatović M, Knežević M (2005) Geomorphological map of the autonomous province of Vojvodina 1:200000. Provincial secretariat for energy and mineral resources of AP Vojvodina, Geozavod-GeminiGoogle Scholar
- Nabighian MN, Ander ME, Grauch VJS, Hansen RO, LaFehr TR, Li Y, Peirce JW, Philips JD, Ruder ME (2005) Historical development of the gravity method in exploration. Geophysics 70:63ND–89ND. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.2133785
- Pigott JD, Radivojević D (2010) Seismic stratigraphy based chronostratigraphy (SSBC) of the Serbian Banat region of the Pannonian Basin. Cent Eur J Geosci 2:481–500. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10085-010-0027-2
- Radivojević D (2014) Regional geological characteristic of Miocene sediments in northern Banat region. Dissertation University of BelgradeGoogle Scholar
- Royden LH, Horváth F (1988) The Pannonian Basin—a study in Basin evolution. AAPG Memoir 45, TulsaGoogle Scholar
- Szabo Z, Pancsics Z (1999a) Rock densities in the Pannonian basin-Hungary. Geophys Trans 42:5–27Google Scholar
- Szabo Z, Pancsics Z (1999b) Gravity map of Hungary corrected for basin effect. Geophys Trans 42:41–54Google Scholar
- Szalaiová E, Bielik M, Makarenko I, Legostaeva O, Hók J, Starostenko V, Šujan M, Šefara J (2008) Calculation of a stripped gravity map with a high degree of accuracy: a case study of Liptovská Kotlina Basin (Northern Slovakia). Geol Q 52:103–114Google Scholar
- Tari G (1992) Late Neogene transpression in the Northern Thrust zone Mecsek Mts. Hungary. Annales of the Eötvös University Budapest Sect Geol 29:165–187Google Scholar