Advertisement

Acta Geophysica

, Volume 67, Issue 2, pp 431–436 | Cite as

The use of earthquake closets in developing countries when large earthquakes strike

  • Max WyssEmail author
Research Article - Solid Earth Sciences
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

Given that more than 90% of earthquake fatalities occur in rural environments, one has to rethink how to protect the population. With most rural buildings being one- and two-story dwellings, the earthquake closet (EC) offers an affordable solution as a protection unit. Two recent earthquakes with nearly 100,000 fatalities each are used for estimating the lives that could be saved and how much this would cost. The cost of constructing an EC in a single-family home is taken to be $500–$600 in developing countries. For the “statistical value of life” $1 million is used, a minimum amount given in the literature. The cost of hospitalization is derived from reports after an earthquake. The number of fatalities and injured avoided is estimated for an example earthquake each in China and Pakistan. The estimated dollar savings resulting in large earthquakes reach $18.3 billion at a cost of $1.3 billion, and $10 billion at a cost of $0.5 billion, respectively, in the two examples.

Keywords

Earthquake losses Earthquake protection Rural population 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank J. W. Li for supplying references for costs for earthquake victims in China and Luis Triveno for references on earthquake protection costs. I also thank R. Console, R. Bishop, and S. Gupta for comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Chen Y, Booth DC (2011) The Wenchuan earthquake of 2008: anatomy of a disaster. Science Press cooperating with Springer, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  2. Gruenthal G (1998) European Macroseismic Scale 1998, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie. Conseil de l’Europe, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  3. Li X, Chen M, Yin DH, Shao Y, Zhou Z, Chen Q (2008) Treatment analysis of 563 wounded patients in the Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu after the Wenchuan earthquake. Chin J Evid Based Med 8:597–601Google Scholar
  4. Li JW, Wyss M, Wu ZL, Zhou SY (2018) Estimated casualty risk for six scenario great earthquakes in Sichuan-Yunnan region, China, for disaster preparation. In: International conference on the decade memory of the Wenchuan earthquake, edited, p 109, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China, Chengdu, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  5. Nayab D, Arif GM (2012) Pakistan panel household survey sample site, attrition and socio-demographic dynamics. In: Poverty and social dynamics paper series, 1, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad, 28ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Pathier E, Fielding EJ, Wright TJ, Walker R, Parsons BE, Hensley S (2006) Displacement field and slip distribution of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake from SAR imagery. Geophys Res Lett 33:20.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Thakur V, Jayagondaperumal R, Champatiray PK, Bhat MI, Malik M (2006) 8 October, 2005 Muzaffarabad earthquake and seismic hazard assessment of Kashmir gap in Northwestern Himalaya. J Geol Soc India 68:187–200Google Scholar
  8. Trendafiloski G, Wyss M, Rosset P (2011) Loss estimation module in the second generation software QLARM. In: Spence R, So E, Scawthorn C (eds) Human casualties in earthquakes: progress in modeling and mitigation. Springer, Berlin, pp 381–391Google Scholar
  9. Viscusi WK, Aldy JE (2003) The value of statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world, NBER working paper series. Working paper 9487, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, 126ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Wyss M (2012) The earthquake closet: rendering early-warning useful. Nat Hazard 62:3927–3935.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0177-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wyss M (2018) Rural populations suffer most in great earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 89(6):1991–1997.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wyss M, Gupta S, Rosset P (2018) Casualty estimates in repeat Himalayan earthquakes in India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 108(5A):2877–2893.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Yoshimura M, Meguro K (2004) Proposal for retrofitting promotion system for low earthquake resistant structures in earthquake prone countries. Paper presented at 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 1–6Google Scholar
  14. Zhang J, Chen W, Meng J, Du L, Wen J, Liu GJ, Li YP (2008) Research on structure and influencing factors of overall medical treatment expenses of 1635 inpatients of Wenchuan earthquake in West China Hospital. Chin J Evid Based Med 8:703–709Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences & Polish Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Centre for Earth Simulation FoundationGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations