Advertisement

Acta Geophysica

, Volume 67, Issue 1, pp 191–203 | Cite as

Analysis of deterministic and geostatistical interpolation techniques for mapping meteorological variables at large watershed scales

  • Mohammad Amin AminiEmail author
  • Ghazale Torkan
  • Saeid Eslamian
  • Mohammad Javad Zareian
  • Jan Franklin Adamowski
Research Article - Hydrology
  • 151 Downloads

Abstract

The widely scattered pattern of meteorological stations in large watersheds and remote locations, along with a need to estimate meteorological data for point sites or areas where little or no data have been recorded, has encouraged the development and implementation of spatial interpolation techniques. The various interpolation techniques featured in GIS software allow for the extraction of this new information from spatially distinct point data. Since no one interpolation method can be accurate in all regions, each method must be evaluated prior to each geographically distinct application. Many methods have been used for interpolating minimum temperature (\(T_{ \min }\)), maximum temperature (\(T_{ \max }\)) and precipitation data; however, only a few methods have been used in the Zayandeh-Rud River basin, Iran, and no comparison of methods has ever been carried out in the area. The accuracies of six spatial interpolation methods [Inverse Distance Weighting, Natural Neighbor (NN), Regularized Spline, Tension Spline, Ordinary Kriging, Universal Kriging] were compared in this study simultaneously, and the best method for mapping monthly precipitation and temperature extremes was determined in a large semi-arid watershed with high temperature and rainfall variation. A cross-validation technique and long-term (1970–2014) average monthly \(T_{ \min }\), \(T_{ \max }\) and precipitation data from meteorological stations within the basin were used to identify the best interpolation method for each variable dataset. For \(T_{ \min }\), Kriging (Gaussian) proved to be the most accurate interpolation method (MAE = 1.827 °C), whereas, for \(T_{ \max }\) and precipitation the NN method performed best (MAE = 1.178 °C and 0.5241 mm, respectively). Accordingly, these variable-optimized interpolation methods were used to define spatial patterns of newly generated climatic maps.

Keywords

Precipitation Sensitivity analysis Spatial interpolation Temperature Zayandeh-Rud River basin 

References

  1. Agnew MD, Palutikof JP (2000) GIS-based construction of baseline climatologies for the Mediterranean using terrain variables. Clim Res 14(2):115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonić O, Križan J, Marki A, Bukovec D (2001) Spatio-temporal interpolation of climatic variables over large region of complex terrain using neural networks. Ecol Model 138(1–3):255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Attorre F, Alfo M, De Sanctis M, Francesconi F, Bruno F (2007) Comparison of interpolation methods for mapping climatic and bioclimatic variables at regional scale. Int J Climatol 27(13):1825–1843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolstad PV, Swift L, Collins F, Régnière J (1998) Measured and predicted air temperatures at basin to regional scales in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Agric For Meteorol 91(3–4):161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (1998) Creating continuous surfaces from point data. In: Burrough PA, Goodchild MF, McDonnell RA, Witzer P, Worboys M (eds) Principles of geographic information systems. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (2000) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Courault D, Monestiez P (1999) Spatial interpolation of air temperature according to atmospheric circulation patterns in southeast France. Int J Climatol J R Meteorol Soc 19(4):365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Das M, Hazra A, Sarkar A, Bhattacharya S, Banik P (2017) Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for estimation of weekly rainfall in West Bengal, India. MAUSAM 68(1):41–50Google Scholar
  9. Davis BM (1987) Uses and abuses of cross-validation in geostatistics. Math Geol 19:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Amorim Borges P, Franke J, Da Anunciação YMT, Weiss H, Bernhofer C (2016) Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for the estimation of precipitation distribution in Distrito Federal, Brazil. Theor Appl Climatol 123(1–2):335–348Google Scholar
  11. Delbari M, Afrasiab P, Jahani S (2013) Spatial interpolation of monthly and annual rainfall in northeast of Iran. Meteorol Atmos Phys 122:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dodson R, Marks D (1997) Daily air temperature interpolated at high spatial resolution over a large mountainous region. Clim Res 8(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erdoğan S (2009) A comparison of interpolation methods for producing digital elevation models at the field scale. Earth Surf Process Landf 34(3):366–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eslamian S, Safavi HR, Gohari A, Sajjadi M, Raghibi V, Zareian MJ (2017) Climate change impacts on some hydrological variables in the Zayandeh-Rud River Basin, Iran. Reviving the dying giant. Springer, Cham, pp 201–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fadavi G, Bazarafshan J (2016) Comparative study of regional estimation methods for daily maximum temperature (a case study of the Isfahan province). J Soil Water 29(2):504–516Google Scholar
  16. Fadavi G, Bazarafshan J, Ghahreman N (2016) Comparison of different regional estimation methods for daily minimum temperature (a case study of Isfahan province). J Agric Meteorol 3(2):14–23Google Scholar
  17. Franke R (1982) Smooth interpolation of scattered data by local thin plate splines. Comput Math Appl 8(4):237–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garen DC, Marks D (2005) Spatially distributed energy balance snowmelt modelling in a mountainous river basin: estimation of meteorological inputs and verification of model results. J Hydrol 315(1–4):126–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goovaerts P (1999) Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma 89:1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hasenauer H, Merganicova K, Petritsch R, Pietsch SA, Thornton PE (2003) Validating daily climate interpolations over complex terrain in Austria. Agric For Meteorol 119(1–2):87–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jarvis CH, Stuart N (2001) A comparison among strategies for interpolating maximum and minimum daily air temperatures. Part II: the interaction between number of guiding variables and the type of interpolation method. J Appl Meteorol 40(6):1075–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karamouz M, Torabi S, Araghinejad S (2007) Case study of monthly regional rainfall evaluation by spatiotemporal geostatistical method. J Hydrol Eng 12(1):97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kisaka M, Monicah Mucheru-Muna O, Ngetich FK, Mugwe J, Mugendi D, Mairura F, Shisanya C, Makokha GL (2016) Potential of deterministic and geostatistical rainfall interpolation under high rainfall variability and dry spells: case of Kenya’s Central Highlands. Theor Appl Climatol 124(1–2):349–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krivoruchko K, Gotway CA (2004) Creating exposure maps using kriging. Public Health GIS News Info 56:11–16Google Scholar
  25. Madani K, Marino MA (2009) System dynamics analysis for managing Iran’s Zayandeh-Rud River Basin. Water Resour Manage 23:2163–2187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merwade VM, Maidment DR, Goff JA (2006) Anisotropic considerations while interpolating river channel bathymetry. J Hydrol 331(3–4):731–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mitas L, Mitasova H (1988) General variational approach to the interpolation problem. Comput Math Appl 16(12):983–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mutua F, Kuria D (2012) A comparison of spatial rainfall estimation techniques: a case study of Nyando River Basin Kenya. J Agric Sci Technol 14(2):149–165Google Scholar
  29. Ninyerola M, Pons X, Roure JM (2000) A methodological approach of climatological modelling of air temperature and precipitation through GIS techniques. Int J Climatol 20(14):1823–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shen SS, Dzikowski P, Li G, Griffith D (2001) Interpolation of 1961–97 daily temperature and precipitation data onto Alberta polygons of ecodistrict and soil landscapes of Canada. J Appl Meteorol 40(12):2162–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sibson R (1981) A brief description of natural neighbor interpolation. In: Barnet V (ed) Interpreting multivariate data. Wiley, Chicester, pp 21–36Google Scholar
  32. Skirvin SM, Marsh SE, McClaran MP, Meko DM (2003) Climate spatial variability and data resolution in a semi-arid watershed, south-eastern Arizona. J Arid Environ 54(4):667–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tatalovich Z, John Wilson P, Cockburn M (2006) A comparison of Thiessen polygon, kriging, and spline models of potential UV exposure. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 33(3):217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thornton PE, Running SW, White MA (1997) Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain. J Hydrol 190(3–4):214–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ver Hoef JM (1993) Universal kriging for ecological data. In: Goodchild MF, Parks BO, Steyaert LT (eds) Environmental modelling with GIS. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 447–453Google Scholar
  36. Voltz M, Webster R (1990) A comparison of kriging, cubic splines and classification for predicting soil properties from sample information. J Soil Sci 41(3):473–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wamwling A (2003) Accuracy of geostatistical prediction of yearly precipitation in Lower Saxony. J Environmetr 14(7):699–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Watson DF, Phillip GM (1987) Neighborhood based interpolation. Geobyte 2(2):12–16Google Scholar
  39. Xia Y, Fabian P, Winterhalter M, Zhao M (2001) Forest climatology: estimation and use of daily climatological data for Bavaria, Germany. Agric For Meteorol 106(2):87–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xiao Y, Gu X, Yin S, Shao J, Cui Y, Zhang Q, Niu Y (2016) Geostatistical interpolation model selection based on ArcGIS and spatio-temporal variability analysis of groundwater level in piedmont plains, northwest China. SpringerPlus 5(1):425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xu C, Wang J, Li Q (2018) A new method for temperature spatial interpolation based on sparse historical stations. J Climate 31(5):1757–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zareian MJ, Eslamian S, Safavi HR (2015) A modified regionalization weighting approach for climate change impact assessment at watershed scale. Theor Appl Climatol 122:497–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences & Polish Academy of Sciences 2018

corrected publication 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Water Resources Management, College of AgricultureTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Water Resources Management, College of AgricultureTehran UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Water Engineering, College of AgricultureIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran
  4. 4.Department of Water Resources Research, Water Research Institute (WRI)Ministry of EnergyTehranIran
  5. 5.Department of Bioresource EngineeringMcGill UniversitySainte-Anne-de-BellevueCanada

Personalised recommendations