Advertisement

Current Medical Science

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 1075–1080 | Cite as

Effects of Preoperative Risk Stratification on Direct In-hospital Costs for Chinese Patients with Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A Single Center Analysis

  • Mei Yang
  • Jia Hao
  • Zhao Jian
  • Ying-bin Xiao
  • Lai-xin Zhou
Article

Summary

The purpose of this study was to analyze the components of inpatient costs for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) according to preoperative risk stratification and to provide evidence for improvement of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) payment. All patients (n=458) receiving an isolated CABG between January 2014 and December 2016 in a tertiary referral center, in southwest China, were analyzed. Hospital mortality was predicted by the EuroSCORE II for each patient. The patients were subdivided into two groups according to the observed mortality (1.97%, 9/458): a high-risk group (group H, predicted mortality ≥1.97%) and a low-risk group (group L, predicted mortality <1.97%). Clinical outcomes, resource use, in-hospital direct costs, and reimbursement expenses were compared between the two groups. Significant differences existed between group L and group H in postoperative mortality (0.4% vs. 3.4%; P=0.02), postoperative complications (10.6% vs. 45.7%; P<0.001), postoperative length of hospital stay (17.5±4.9 days vs. 18.8±6.5 days, P=0.01), in-hospital costs ($20 256±3096 vs. $23 334±6332; P<0.001), and reimbursement expenses ($7775±2627 vs. $9639±3917; P<0.001). In general, a higher EuroSCORE II was significantly associated with a worse clinical outcome and increased costs. The CABG cost data provide evidence for improvement of DRGs payment.

Key words

coronary artery bypass graft risk stratification hospital costs medical insurance payment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gong P, Liang S, Carlton EJ, et al. Urbanisation and health in China. Lancet, 2012,379(9818):843–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang G, Kong L, Zhao W, et al. Emergence of chronic non-communicable diseases in China. Lancet, 2008,372(9650):1697–1705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moran AE, Forouzanfar MH, Roth GA, et al. Temporal trends in ischemic heart disease mortality in 21 world regions, 1980 to 2010: the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Circulation, 2014,129(14):1483–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xi B, Liu F, Hao Y, et al. The growing burden of cardiovascular diseases in China. Int J Cardiol, 2014,174(3):736–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao C, Wang C, Shen C, et al. Diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based case-mix funding system, a promising alternative for fee for service payment in China. Bioscie Trends, 2018,12(2):109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu R, Shi J, Yang B, et al. Charting a path forward: policy analysis of China’s evolved DRG-based hospital payment system. Int Health, 2017,9(5):317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nashef SA, Roques F, Sharples LD, et al. EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012,41(4):734–744; discussion 744-745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ma X, Wang Y, Shan L, et al. Validation of SinoSCORE for isolated CABG operation in East China. Sci Rep, 2017,7(1):16806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hogervorst EK, Rosseel PMJ, van de Watering LMG, et al. Prospective validation of the EuroSCORE II risk model in a single Dutch cardiac surgery centre. Neth Heart J. 2018, Sep.19. [Epub ahead of print] doi: 10.1007/s12471-018-1161-xGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Osnabrugge RL, Speir AM, Head SJ, et al. Costs for surgical aortic valve replacement according to preoperative risk categories. Ann Thorac Surg, 2013,96(2):500–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raza S, Sabik JF 3rd, Ainkaran P, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetics: A growing health care cost crisis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015,150(2):304–2.e2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    LaPar DJ, Rich JB, Isbell JM, et al. Preoperative Renal Function Predicts Hospital Costs and Length of Stay in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016,101(2):606–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Getsios D, Wang Y, Stolar M, et al. Improved perioperative blood pressure control leads to reduced hospital costs. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2013,14(10):1285–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li X, Lu J, Hu S, et al. The primary health-care system in China. Lancet, 2017, 390(10 112):2584–2594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mehaffey JH, Hawkins RB, Byler M, et al. Cost of individual complications following coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2018,155(3):875–882e1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Osnabrugge RL, Speir AM, Head SJ, et al. Prediction of costs and length of stay in coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014,98(4):1286–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu D, Yu F, Nie W. Improvement of the reduction in catastrophic L health expenditure in China’s public health insurance. PLoS One, 2018,13(4):e0194915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Silva GSD, Colosimo FC, Sousa AG, et al. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Cost Coverage by the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). Braz J Cardiovasc Surg, 2017,32(4):253–259Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Osnabrugge RL, Speir AM, Head SJ, et al. Cost, quality, and value in coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014,148(6):2729–2735e1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yip WC, Hsiao WC, Chen W, et al. Early appraisal of China’s huge and complex health-care reforms. Lancet, 2012,379(9818):833–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xinqiao HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.Southwest HospitalArmy Medical UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations