Advertisement

Current Medical Science

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 914–919 | Cite as

Evaluation of Long-term Stability of Vertical Control in Hyperdivergent Patients Treated with Temporary Anchorage Devices

  • Jin-rong Deng
  • Yan-ang Li
  • Xue-dong Wang
  • Jing Li
  • Yun Ding
  • Yan-heng Zhou
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the long-term stability of vertical control in hyperdivergent patients treated with temporary anchorage devices. The sample included 20 hyperdivergent patients without anterior open bite. The temporary anchorage devices were used to intrude the upper incisor and molars for vertical control. Lateral cephalograms were established prior to treatment, immediately after treatment, and during retention. The upper molars and incisors were intruded by 1.33 mm and 1.41 mm after treatment (P<0.05). U6-PP increased by 0.11 mm and 0.23 mm during the first and second stages of retention (P>0.05). U1-PP was found to possess a significant extrusion of 1.2 mm during the first stage (P<0.05), which increased by 0.68 mm during the second stage (P>0.05). The mandibular plane angle (MP-SN) decreased by 2.58 degrees following treatment, and underwent a relapse of 0.51 degree and 0.42 degree during the first and second stages of retention respectively (P>0.05). No significant soft tissue changes occurred, with the exception of increased upper lip length during the second stage (P<0.05). Maxillary anterior and posterior intrusions, counter clockwise rotation of the mandibular plane, and improved profiles can be successfully achieved following treatment with vertical control. During the first stage of retention (less than three years), intruded molars and incisors both exhibited some extrusion, and molars had better long-term stability than incisors. During the second stage of retention (three to six years), the therapeutic effects appeared stable, with the exception of some increase in upper lip length. Rotated mandibular plane remained stable during the entire retention period.

Key words

hyperdivergent temporary anchorage devices molar intrusion vertical control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shudy FF. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod, 1964,34(2):75–93Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baek MS, Choi YJ, Yu HS, et al. Long-term stability of anterior open-bite treatment by intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010,138:396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu L, Qu YY, Jiang LJ, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of a newly designed onplant miniplate anchorage system. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 2016,36(3):422–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cope JB, Sachdeva RC. Nonsurgical correction of a class II malocclusion with a vertical growth tendency. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999,116(1):66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ruf S, Pancherz H. The effect of Herbst appliance treatment on the mandibular plane angle: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996,110(2):225–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hui NN, Wang ZW, Luo J, et al. Comparison of the treatment outcomes between different anchorages in vertical control of adult molars with Angle Class II hyperdivergent malocclusion. Yati Yasui Yazhoubingxue Zazhi (Chinese), 2016,26(5):309–312Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ouyang L, Zhou YH, Fu MK, et al. The preliminary clinical study of posterior vertical control of high angle non-openbite extraction cases through microscrew implant anchorage. Zhonghua Kouqiang Zhengjixue Zazhi (Chinese), 2008,15(1):34–38Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hong RK, Lim SM, Heo JM, et al. Orthodontic treatment of gummy smile by maxillary total intrusion with a midpalatal absolute anchorage system. Korean J Orthod, 2013,43(3):147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deguchi T, Kurosaka H, Oikawa H, et al. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in adults with skeletal open bite between conventional edgewise treatment and implant-anchored orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011,139(4 Suppl):S60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hart TR, Cousley RR, Fishman LS, et al. Dentoskeletal changes following mini-implant molar intrusion in anterior open bite patients. Angle Orthod, 2015,85(6):941–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xun C, Zeng X, Wang X. Microscrew Anchorage in Skeletal Anterior Open-bite Treatment. Angle Orthod, 2007,77(1): 47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buschang PH, Carrillo R, Rossouw PE. Orthopedic correction of growing hyperdivergent, retrognathic, patients with miniscrew implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011,69(3):754–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee HA, Park YC. Treatment and posttreatment changes following intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth with miniscrew implants for open bite correction. Korean J Orthod, 2008,38(1):31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Foot R, Dalci O, Gonzales C, et al. The short-term skeleto-dental effects of a new spring for the intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth in open bite patients. Prog Orthod, 2014,15(1):56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Erverdi N, Keles A, Nanda R. The use of skeletal anchorage in open bite treatment: a cephalometric evaluation. Angle Orthod, 2004,74(3):381–390Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marzouk ES, Abdallah EM, El-Kenany WA. Molar Intrusion in Open-bite Adults Using Zygomatic Miniplates. Int J Orthod Milwaukee, 2015,26(2):47–54Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oliveira TF, Nakao CY, Goncalves JR, et al. Maxillary molar intrusion with zygomatic anchorage in open bite treatment: lateral and oblique cephalometric evaluation. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015,19(1):71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Polat-Ozsoy O, Arman-Ozcirpici A, Veziroglu F. Miniscrews for upper incisor intrusion. Eur J Orthod, 2009,31(4):412–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scheffler NR, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes and stability in patients with anterior open bite and long anterior face height treated with temporary anchorage devices and a maxillary intrusion splint. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2014,146(5):594–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marzouk ES, Kassem HE. Evaluation of long-term stability of skeletal anterior open bite correction in adults treated with maxillary posterior segment intrusion using zygomatic miniplates. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2016,150(1):78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sugawara J, Baik UB, Umemori M, et al. Treatment and posttreatment dentoalveolar changes following intrusion of mandibular molars with application of a skeletal anchorage system (SAS) for open bite correction. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 2002,17(4):243–253Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Swinnen K, Politis C, Willems G, et al. Skeletal and dento-alveolar stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of anterior open bite: a retrospective study. Eur J Orthod, 2001,23(5):547–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Proffit WR, Bailey LJ, Phillips C, et al. Long-term stability of surgical open-bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy. Angle Orthod, 2000,70(2):112–117Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoppenreijs TJ, Freihofer HP, Stoelinga PJ, et al. Skeletal and dento-alveolar stability of Le Fort I intrusion osteotomies and bimaxillary osteotomies in anterior open bite deformities. A retrospective three-centre study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1997,26(3):161–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kuroda S, Sakai Y, Tamamura N, et al. Treatment of severe anterior open bite with skeletal anchorage in adults: comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007,132(5):599–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang XD, Zhang JN, Liu DW, et al. Nonsurgical correction of a severe anterior deep overbite accompanied by a gummy smile and posterior scissor bite using a miniscrew-assisted straightwire technique in an adult high-angle case. Korean J Orthod, 2016,46(4):253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang XD, Zhang JN, Liu DW, et al. Nonsurgical correction using miniscrew-assisted vertical control of a severe high angle with mandibular retrusion and gummy smile in an adult. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017,151(5):978–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pearson LE. Vertical control in treatment of patients having backward rotational growth tendencies. Angle Orthod, 1978,48(2):132–140Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sivakumar A, Valiathan A. Cephalometric assessment of dentofacial vertical changes in Class I subjects treated with and without extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008,13(6):869–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jin-rong Deng
    • 1
  • Yan-ang Li
    • 2
  • Xue-dong Wang
    • 1
  • Jing Li
    • 1
  • Yun Ding
    • 3
  • Yan-heng Zhou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of StomatologyPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Sunny DentalShanghaiChina
  3. 3.3rd Dental Center, School and Hospital of StomatologyPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations