Hierarchical micro-mesoporous carbon prepared from waste cotton textile for lithium-sulfur batteries
- 28 Downloads
As the next generation battery, the lithium-sulfur battery with high theoretical specific capacity and energy density needs to overcome the low practical discharge capacity and the poor cycle performance for the poor conductivity of sulfur and the shuttle effect of polysulfide. In this study, a hierarchical micro-mesoporous carbon (HPC) is designed and synthesized as a sulfur host from the cotton textile with KOH activation at 700 °C to combine the advantages of these two structures, where mesoporous structure can improve the infiltration of electrolyte to act as fast ionic channel and micropores have an excellent ability of binding sulfur. The HPC showed an excellent high specific surface area (2835.47 m2 g−1) and a high pore volume (2.82 cm3 g−1), and the ratio of the mesoporous reaches 57.85%. The sulfur in HPC/S was uniformly distributed in the host structure and no surface crystallization was observed by TEM characterization. Assembled in the lithium-sulfur battery, the cathode mixed with HPC/S and conductive agent delivers an initial discharge capacity of 1577 mAh g−1 at 0.1C, and a reversible capacity of 434.5 mAh g−1 after 300 cycles at the current rate of 1C.
KeywordsKOH activation Cotton textile Hierarchical micro-mesoporous carbon Lithium-sulfur battery
This work was financially supported by the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 2018JJ3506 and 2017JJ3068), the general project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education (No. 17C1517 and 16C0623), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51572233, 61574121 and 11847106).
- 9.Su D, Zhou D, Wang C, Wang G (2018) Toward high performance lithium–sulfur batteries based on Li2S cathodes and beyond: status, challenges, and perspectives. Adv Funct Mater 28(38):1800154Google Scholar
- 10.Zhang L, Wang Y, Niu Z, Chen J (2018) Advanced nanostructured carbon-based materials for rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. Carbon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.067
- 25.Zhai S, Karahan HE, Wei L, Qian Q, Harris AT, Minett AI, Ramakrishna S, Ng AK, Chen Y (2016) Textile energy storage: structural design concepts, material selection and future perspectives. Energy Storage Materials 3:123–139Google Scholar
- 31.Marsh H, Reinoso FR (2006) Activated carbon. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 38.Han J, Li Y, Li S, Long P, Cao C, Cao Y, Wang W, Feng Y, Feng W (2018) A low cost ultra-microporous carbon scaffold with confined chain-like sulfur molecules as a superior cathode for lithium–sulfur batteries. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2(10):2187–2196Google Scholar
- 42.Liu M, Li Q, Qin X, Liang G, Han W, Zhou D, He Y-B, Li B, Kang F (2017) Suppressing self-discharge and shuttle effect of lithium–sulfur batteries with V2O5-decorated carbon nanofiber interlayer. Small 13(12):1602539Google Scholar
- 56.Liang J, Sun Z-H, Li F, Cheng H-M (2016) Carbon materials for Li–S batteries: functional evolution and performance improvement. Energy Storage Materials 2:76–106Google Scholar
- 62.Qie L, Zu C, Manthiram A (2016) A high energy lithium–sulfur battery with ultrahigh–loading lithium polysulfide cathode and its failure mechanism. Adv Energy Mater 6(7):1502459Google Scholar