Advertisement

Ionics

, Volume 25, Issue 7, pp 3397–3406 | Cite as

Solid-state potentiometric CO2 sensor combining Li3PO4 with MoO3-doped Li2CO3 sensing electrode

  • Hairong WangEmail author
  • Hanlin Chen
  • Mi Zhang
  • Jiuhong Wang
  • Jianhai Sun
Original Paper
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

The potentiometric CO2 gas sensors based on Li3PO4 thin film using different MoO3-doped Li2CO3 as sensing electrodes were investigated. The sensing electrode materials were prepared by screen printing while the Li3PO4 electrolyte thin film by thermal evaporation. The materials’ phase composition and the microstructures were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive spectrum (EDS), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The sensors were tested at the temperature ranging from 350 °C to 500 °C with an interval of 25 °C. The results showed that all sensors have better sensing properties at higher working temperatures. Among them, the sensor attached with 10 wt% MoO3-doped Li2CO3 exhibit excellent sensing performance, and its sensitivity attains to 95.7 mV/decade and the response and recovery time are 16 s and 22 s respectively at 500 °C. Its output EMF is more stable than any other sensors annealed at 550 °C. The MoO3-doped Li2CO3 sensing electrodes can significantly improve the sensors’ properties because of the porous microstructure and catalytic characteristics during the reaction period.

Keywords

MoO3 CO2 gas sensor Sensitivity Solid electrolyte 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the support from the International Joint Laboratory for Micro/Nano Manufacturing and Measurement Technologies.

Funding information

The work is supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. E51675420), the National Key Research & Development (R&D) Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0501604-02), and 111 Program (No. B12016).

References

  1. 1.
    Lee J, Choi NJ, Lee HK, Kim J, Lim SY, Kwon JY, Lee SM, Moon SE, Jong JJ, Yoo DJ (2017) Low power consumption solid electrochemical-type micro CO2 gas sensor. Sensors Actuators B Chem 248:957–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yadav AA, Lokhande AC, Kim JH, Lokhande CD (2017) Enhanced sensitivity and selectivity of CO2 gas sensor based on modified La2O3 nanorods. J Alloys Compd 723:880–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Joshi S, Lanka S, Ippolito SJ, Bhargava SK, Sunkara MV (2016) {111} faceted Li4Ti5O12 octahedra as the reference electrode material in a nanostructured potentiometric CO2 sensor. J Mater Chem A 4(42):16418–16431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee H-K, Choi N-J, Moon SE, Yang WS, Kim J (2012) A solid electrolyte potentiometric CO2 gas sensor composed of lithium phosphate as both the reference and the solid electrolyte materials. J Korean Phys Soc 61(6):938–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wiegärtner S, Kita J, Hagen G, Schmaus C, Kießig A, Glaser E, Bolz A, Moos R (2014) Development and application of a fast solid-state potentiometric CO2-sensor in thick-film technology. Procedia Engineering 87:1031–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yoon J, Hunter G, Akbar S, Dutta PK (2013) Interface reaction and its effect on the performance of a CO2 gas sensor based on Li0.35La0.55TiO3 electrolyte and Li2CO3 sensing electrode. Sensors Actuators B Chem 182:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dang H-Y, Guo X-M (2013) Characteristics and performance of NASICON-based CO2 sensor using Bi8Nb2O17 plus Pt as solid-reference electrode. Sensors Actuators B Chem 178:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liang X, Wang B, Zhang H, Diao Q, Quan B, Lu G (2013) Progress in NASICON-based mixed-potential type gas sensors. Sensors Actuators B Chem 187:522–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng X, Wang C, Wang B, Sun R, Guan Y, Sun Y, Liang X, Sun P, Lu G (2015) Mixed-potential-type YSZ-based sensor with nano-structured NiO and porous TPB processed with pore-formers using coating technique. Sensors Actuators B Chem 221:1321–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lund A, Jacobsen T, Hansen KV, Mogensen M (2011) Composite Sr- and V-doped LaCrO3 /YSZ sensor electrode operating at low oxygen levels. J Solid State Electrochem 16(6):2113–2120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mahendraprabhu K, Miura N, Elumalai P (2013) Temperature dependence of NO2 sensitivity of YSZ-based mixed potential type sensor attached with NiO sensing electrode. Ionics 19(11):1681–1686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhu Y, Zhang J, Weppner W (2013) Potentiometric CO2 sensor with au,Li2CO3/Li+-electrolyte/LiMn2O4 structure. J Solid State Electrochem 17:1473–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang H, Liu Z, Chen D, Jiang Z (2015) A new potentiometric SO2 sensor based on Li3PO4 electrolyte film and its response characteristics. Rev Sci Instrum 86(7):075007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sun G, Wang H, Li P, Liu Z, Jiang Z (2014) Response characteristics of a potentiometric CO2 gas sensor based on Li3PO4 solid electrolyte using Au film as the electrodes. J Appl Phys 115(12):124505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee I, Akbar SA (2013) Potentiometric carbon dioxide sensor based on thin Li3PO4 electrolyte and Li2CO3 sensing electrode. Ionics 20(4):563–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Noh WS, Satyanarayana L, Jin SP (2005) Potentiometric CO2 sensor using Li+ ion conducting Li3PO4 thin film electrolyte. Sensors 5(11):465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang H, Chen D, Zhang M, Liu Z (2016) Au thin-film electrodes based potentiometric CO2 sensor using Li3PO4 as both the reference material and the solid electrolyte. Micro Nano Lett 11(9):545–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Du JF, Bai Y, Chu WY, Qiao LJ (2010) The microstructure and performance of solid-state hydrogen sensor using CH3COONH4-doped chitosan as electrolyte. J Appl Electrochem 41(2):183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cai H, Sun R, Yang X, Liang X, Wang C, Sun P, Liu F, Zhao C, Sun Y, Lu G (2016) Mixed-potential type NOx sensor using stabilized zirconia and MoO3–In2O3 nanocomposites. Ceram Int 42(10):12503–12507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nadimicherla R, Li H-Y, Tian K, Guo X (2017) SnO2 doped MoO3 nanofibers and their carbon monoxide gas sensing performances. Solid State Ionics 300:128–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shen J, Guo S, Chen C, Sun L, Wen S, Chen Y, Ruan S (2017) Synthesis of Ni-doped α-MoO3 nanolamella and their improved gas sensing properties. Sensors Actuators B Chem 252:757–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li Y (2017) Morphology-controllable synthesis of three-dimensional α-MoO3 and their applications in gas sensing. Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 94:22–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim HU, Son J, Kulkarni A, Ahn C, Kim KS, Shin D, Yeom GY, Kim T (2017) Highly uniform wafer-scale synthesis of alpha-MoO3 by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Nanotechnology 28(17):175601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sun Y, Chen L, Wang Y, Zhao Z, Li P, Zhang W, Leprince-Wang Y, Hu J (2016) Synthesis of MoO3/WO3 composite nanostructures for highly sensitive ethanol and acetone detection. J Mater Sci 52(3):1561–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang J, Song P, Li J, Yang Z, Wang Q (2017) Template-assisted synthesis of hierarchical MoO3 microboxes and their high gas-sensing performance. Sensors Actuators B Chem 249:458–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang M, Chen HL, Wang HR (2018) Improved sensing properties of CO2 gas sensor based on Li3PO4-Li2SiO3 thin film compared with Li3PO4. J Electrochem Soc 165(5):B167–B173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xiang Q, Zhang D (2017) Fabrication of molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) coating by electrophoretic deposition. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28(10):7449–7453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mai LQ, Hu B, Chen W, Qi YY, Lao CS, Yang RS, Dai Y, Wang ZL (2007) Lithiated MoO3 nanobelts with greatly improved performance for lithium batteries. Adv Mater 19(21):3712–3716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang Z, Madhavi S, Lou XW (2012) Ultralong α-MoO3 nanobelts: synthesis and effect of binder choice on their lithium storage properties. J Phys Chem C 116(23):12508–12513CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hairong Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Hanlin Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mi Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jiuhong Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jianhai Sun
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anP.R. China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems EngineeringXi’anP.R. China
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Transducer TechnologyInstitute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingP.R. China

Personalised recommendations