Advertisement

Ionics

pp 1–14 | Cite as

Solid solutions of hexanoyl chitosan/poly(vinyl chloride) blends and NaI for all-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells

  • F. H. Muhammad
  • R. H. Y. Subban
  • Tan WinieEmail author
Original Paper
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Solid solutions of hexanoyl chitosan/poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) blends comprising sodium iodide (NaI) were studied. Differential scanning calorimetry results reveal that (i) hexanoyl chitosan and PVC are immiscible and (ii) preferential interaction of NaI with hexanoyl chitosan than PVC. X-ray diffraction results show that the presence of PVC hinders the crystallinity of hexanoyl chitosan and the sample with lower crystallinity exhibits higher conductivity. The maximum conductivities acquired for neat hexanoyl chitosan, PVC, and the blend system are 1.3 × 10−6, 2.9 × 10−8, and 1.5 × 10−5 S cm−1, respectively. The number and mobility of ions were calculated using impedance spectroscopy to elucidate the conductivity variation. The performance of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) employing hexanoyl chitosan/PVC–NaI electrolytes was investigated with respect to NaI content. With 30 wt% of NaI, DSSC shows an efficiency (η) of 2.93% with short circuit current density (Jsc) of 8.62 mA cm−2 and open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.58 V. The presence of 4-tert-butylpyridine and guanidinium thiocyanate increases the η to 5.31%, the Jsc to 17.69 mA cm−2, and the Voc to 0.65 V. Improvement of DSSC performance is by passivating the TiO2 surface from recombination.

Keywords

Hexanoyl chitosan PVC Polymer blend Conductivity Dye-sensitized solar cells 

Notes

Funding information

The authors wish to thank Universiti Teknologi MARA for supporting this work through DANA 5/3 REI (2/2017) REI and F.H. Muhammad thanks the University for the scholarship awarded.

References

  1. 1.
    Winie T, Ramesh S, Arof AK (2009) Studies on the structure and transport properties of hexanoyl chitosan-based polymer electrolytes. Phys B Condens Matter 404:4308–4311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aziz SB, Abidin ZHZ (2014) Electrical and morphological analysis of chitosan: AgTf solid electrolyte. Mater Chem Phys 144:280–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Muhammad FH, Subban RHY, Winie T (2017) Charge carrier density and mobility of poly (vinyl chloride)-based polymer electrolyte using impedance spectroscopy. Mater Today Proc 4(4):5130–5137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rudhziah S, Rani MSA, Ahmad A, Mohamed NS, Kaddami H (2015) Potential of blend of kappa-carrageenan and cellulose derivatives for green polymer electrolyte application. Ind Crop Prod 72:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar KK, Ravi M, Pavani Y, Bhavani S, Sharma AK, Rao VVRN (2011) Investigations on the effect of complexation of NaF salt with polymer blend (PEO / PVP) electrolytes on ionic conductivity and optical energy band gaps. Phys B Condens Matter 406:1706–1712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Winie T, Shahril NSM, Chan CH, Arof AK (2014) Selective localization of lithium trifluoromethanesulfonate in the blend of hexanoyl chitosan and polystyrene. High Perform Polym 26:666–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yap KS, Teo LP, Sim LN, Majid SR, Arof AK (2012) Investigation on dielectric relaxation of PMMA-grafted natural rubber incorporated with LiCF3SO3. Phys B Condens Matter 407:2421–2428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li P, Zhang Y, Fa W, Zhang Y, Huang B (2011) Synthesis of a grafted cellulose gel electrolyte in an ionic liquid ([Bmim]I) for dye-sensitized solar cells. Carbohydr Polym 86:1216–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Panday A, Mullin S, Gomez ED, Wanakule N, Chan VL, Hexemer A, Pople J, Balsara NP (2009) Effect of molecular weight and salt concentration on conductivity of block copolymer electrolytes. Macromolecules 42:4632–4637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Winie T, Arof AK (2006) Transport properties of hexanoyl chitosan-based gel electrolyte. Ionics 12:149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muhammad FH, Jamal A, Winie T (2016) Dielectric and AC conductivity behavior of hexanoyl chitosan-NaI based polymer electrolytes. Int J Adv Appl Sci 3:9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosli NHA, Chan CH, Subban RHY, Winie T (2012) Studies on the structural and electrical properties of hexanoyl chitosan/polystyrene-based polymer electrolytes. Phys Procedia 25:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Winie T, Shahril NSM (2015) Conductivity enhancement by controlled percolation of inorganic salt in multiphase hexanoyl chitosan/polystyrene polymer blends. Front Mater Sci 9:132–140Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Winie T, Hanif NSM, Chan CH, Arof AK (2014) Effect of the surface treatment of the TiO2 fillers on the properties of hexanoyl chitosan / polystyrene blend-based composite polymer electrolytes. Ionics 20:347–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Winie T, Jamal A, Hanif NSM, Shahril NSM (2014) Hexanoyl chitosan-polystyrene blend based composite polymer electrolyte with surface treated TiO2 fillers. Key Eng Mater 594–595:656–660Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xi J, Qiu X, Li J, Tang X, Zhu W, Chen L (2006) PVDF-PEO blends based microporous polymer electrolyte: effect of PEO on pore configurations and ionic conductivity. J Power Sources 157:501–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pan Y, Liu X, Hao X, Starý Z, Schubert DW (2016) Enhancing the electrical conductivity of carbon black-filled immiscible polymer blends by tuning the morphology. Eur Polym J 78:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ahmad A, Rahman MYA, Ali MLM, Hashim H, Kalam FA (2007) Solid polymeric electrolyte of PVC-ENR-LiClO4. Ionics 13:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang S, Min K (2010) Solid polymer electrolytes of blends of polyurethane and polyether modified polysiloxane and their ionic conductivity. Polymer 51:2621–2628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Muhammad FH, Jamal A, Winie T (2017) Study on factors governing the conductivity performance of acylated chitosan-NaI electrolyte system. Ionics 23:3045–3056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prabakaran K, Mohanty S, Nayak SK (2015) Solid state metal-free eosin-Y dye sensitized solar cell based on PVdF-HFP electrolytes: combined effect of surface modified TiO2 and plasticizer on electrochemical and photovoltaic properties. J Solid State Electrochem 19:2465–2479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dissanayake MAKL, Rupasinghe WNS, Seneviratne VA, Thotawatthage CA, Senadeera GKR (2014) Optimization of iodide ion conductivity and nano filler effect for efficiency enhancement in polyethylene oxide (PEO) based dye sensitized solar cells. Electrochim Acta 145:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim T, Song D, Barea EM, Lee JH, Kim YR, Cho W, Lee S, Rahman MM, Bisquert J, Kang YS (2016) Origin of high open-circuit voltage in solid state dye-sensitized solar cells employing polymer electrolyte. Nano Energy 28:455–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khanmirzaei MH, Ramesh S, Ramesh K (2015) Polymer electrolyte based dye-sensitized solar cell with rice starch and 1-methyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide ionic liquid. Mater Des 85:833–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rudhziah S, Ahmad A, Ahmad I, Mohamed NS (2015) Biopolymer electrolytes based on blend of kappa-carrageenan and cellulose derivatives for potential application in dye sensitized solar cell. Electrochim Acta 175:162–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zong Z, Kimura Y, Takahashi M, Yamane H (2000) Characterization of chemical and solid state structures of acylated chitosans. Polymer 41:899–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fan L, Dang Z, Nan C, Li M (2002) Thermal, electrical and mechanical properties of plasticized polymer electrolytes based on PEO/P (VDF-HFP) blends. Electrochim Acta 48:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pradeepa P, Edwinraj S, Ramesh Prabhu M (2015) Effects of ceramic filler in poly (vinyl chloride)/poly (ethyl methacrylate) based polymer blend electrolytes. Chin Chem Lett 26:6–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Buraidah MH, Teo LP, Yong CMA, Shah S, Arof AK (2016) Performance of polymer electrolyte based on chitosan blended with poly (ethylene oxide) for plasmonic dye-sensitized solar cell. Opt Mater 57:202–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Winie T, Arof AK (2014) Impedance spectroscopy: basic concepts and application for electrical evaluation of polymer electrolytes. In: Chan CH, Chua CH, Thomas S (eds) Physical chemistry of macromolecules. Apple Academic Press, USA, pp 335–363Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Arof AK, Amirudin S, Yusof SZ, Noor IM (2014) A method based on impedance spectroscopy to determine transport properties of polymer electrolytes. R Soc Chem 16:1856–1867Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Qian X, Gu N, Cheng Z, Yang X, Wang E, Dong S (2011) Impedance study of (PEO)10LiClO4-Al2O3 composite polymer electrolyte with blocking electrodes. Electrochim Acta 46:18–29Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bandara TMWJ, Dissanayake MAKL, Albinsson I, Mellander B-E (2011) Mobile charge carrier concentration and mobility of a polymer electrolyte containing PEO and Pr4N+I using electrical and dielectric measurements. Solid State Ionics 189:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Winie T, Arof AK (2004) Dielectric behaviour and AC conductivity of LiCF3SO3 doped H-chitosan polymer films. Ionics 10:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Miyamoto T, Shibayama K (1973) Free-volume model for ionic conductivity in polymers. J Appl Phys 44:5372–5376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Arof AK, Aziz MF, Noor MM, Careem MA, Bandara LRAK, Thotawatthage CA, Rupasinghe WNS, Dissanayake MAKL (2014) Efficiency enhancement by mixed cation effect in dye-sensitized solar cells with a PVdF based gel polymer electrolyte. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:2929–2935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sim K, Sung S, Jo HJ, Jeon D, Kim D (2013) Electrochemical investigation of high-performance dye-sensitized solar cells based on molybdenum for preparation of counter electrode. Int J Electrochemical Science 8:8272–8281Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Qadir MB, Sun KC, Sahito IA, Arbab AA, Choi BJ, Yi SC, Jeong SH (2015) Composite multi-functional over layer: a novel design to improve the photovoltaic performance of DSSC. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 140:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Naik P, Abdellah IM, Shakour MA, Su R, Keremane KS, Shafei AE, Adhikari AV (2018) Improvement in performance of N3 sensitized DSSCs with structurally simple aniline based organic co-sensitizers. Sol Energy 174:999–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Khanmohammadi K, Sohrabi B, Meymian MRZ (2018) Effect of electron-donating and -withdrawing substitutions in naphthoquinone sensitizers: the structure engineering of dyes for DSSCs. J Mol Struct 1167:274–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Grätzel C, Zakeeruddin SM (2013) Recent trends in mesoscopic solar cells based on molecular and nanopigment light harvesters. Mater Today 16:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Han Q, Hu Z, Wang H, Sun Y, Zhang J, Gao L, Wu M (2018) High performance metal sulfide counter electrodes for organic sulfide redox couple in dye-sensitized solar cells. Mater Today Energy 8:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hersant G, Hammami A, Armand M, Marsan B (2017) Synthesis and electrochemical properties of potassium 5-trifluoromethyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-thiolate/disulfide redox couple. J Electroanal Chem 787:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Funabiki K, Saito Y, Doi M, Yamada K, Yoshikawa Y, Manseki K, Kubota Y, Matsui M (2014) Tetrazole thiolate/disulfide organic redox couples carrying long alkyl groups in dye-sensitized solar cells with Pt-free electrodes. Tetrahedron 70:6312–6317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rajamanickam N, Soundarrajan P, Kumar SMS, Jayakumar K, Ramachandran K (2019) Boosting photo charge carrier transport properties of perovskite BaSnO3 photoanodes by Sr doping for enhanced DSSCs performance. Electrochim Acta 296:771–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Manikandan VS, Palai AK, Mohanty S, Nayak SK (2018) Surface plasmonic effect of Ag enfold ZnO pyramid nanostructured photoanode for enhanced dye sensitize solar cell application. Ceram Int 44:21314–21322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mehmood U, Hussein IA, Harrabi K, Mekki MB, Ahmed S, Tabet N (2015) Hybrid TiO2-multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNTs) photoanodes for efficient dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 140:174–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nemala SS, Kartikay P, Agrawal RK, Bhargava P, Mallick S, Bohm S (2018) Few layers graphene based conductive composite inks for Pt free stainless steel counter electrodes for DSSC. Sol Energy 169:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sahito IA, Sun KC, Arbab AA, Qadir MB, Jeong SH (2015) Graphene coated cotton fabrics as textile structured counter electrode for DSSC. Electrochim Acta 173:164–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Anuratha KS, Ramaprakash M, Panda SK, Mohan S (2017) Studies on synergetic effect of rGO-NiCo2S4 nanocomposite as an effective counter electrode material for DSSC. Ceram Int 43:10174–10182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Paulsson H, Kloo L, Hagfeldt A, Boschloo G (2006) Electron transport and recombination in dye-sensitized solar cells with ionic liquid electrolytes. J Electroanal Chem 586:56–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Teo LP, Tiong TS, Buraidah MH, Arof AK (2018) Effect of lithium iodide on the performance of dye sensitized solar cells (DSSC) using poly (ethylene oxide) (PEO)/poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA) based gel polymer electrolytes. Opt Mater 85:531–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kalaignan GP, kang MS, Kang YS (2006) Effects of compositions on properties of PEO-KI-I2 salts polymer electrolytes for DSSC. Solid State Ionics 177:1091–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kim JY, Kim JY, Lee DK, Kim BS, Kim H, Ko MJ (2012) Importance of 4-tert-butylpyridine in electrolyte for dye-sensitized solar cells employing SnO2 electrode. J Phys Chem C 116:22759–22766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kopidakis N, Neale NR, Frank AJ (2006) Effect of an adsorbent on recombination and band-edge movement in dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cells: evidence for surface passivation. J Phys Chem B 110:12485–12489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Nakade S, Kanzaki T, Kubo W, Kitamura T, Wada Y, Yanagida S (2005) Role of electrolytes on charge recombination in dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cell (1): the case of solar cells using the I/I3 redox couple. J Phys Chem B 109:3480–3487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Stergiopoulos T, Rozi E, Karagianni CS, Falaras P (2011) Influence of electrolyte co-additives on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lee KM, Suryanarayanan V, Ho KC, Thomas KRJ, Lin JT (2007) Effcets of co-adsorbate and additive on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells: a photophysical study. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 91:1426–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhang C, Huang Y, Huo Z, Chen S, Dai S (2009) Photoelectrochemical effects of guanidinium thiocyanate on dye-sensitized solar cell performance and stability. J Phys Chem C 113:21779–21783CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. H. Muhammad
    • 1
  • R. H. Y. Subban
    • 2
    • 3
  • Tan Winie
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Center of Foundation StudiesUniversiti Teknologi MARADengkilMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Applied SciencesUniversiti Teknologi MARAShah AlamMalaysia
  3. 3.Institute of ScienceUniversiti Teknologi MARAShah AlamMalaysia

Personalised recommendations