Polypyrrole-modified carbon nanotubes@manganese dioxide@sulfur composite for lithium–sulfur batteries
- 4 Downloads
Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) battery is one of the most promising next-generation energy storage devices due to its high-capacity density and low cost. However, lithium–sulfur batteries could not be widely used in a large range due to the “shuttle effect” and sulfur insulation. Herein, we proposed a novel composite cathode of carbon nanotubes@manganese dioxide@sulfur@polypyrrole (C@MnO2@S@PPy). X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) BET analysis show that sulfur filled into the pores of C@MnO2, and PPy was successfully coated on C@MnO2@S. TG indicated that the compound contained 60 wt% active sulfur. The prepared cathode of C@MnO2@S@PPy composites shows excellent rate performance and cycle stability. At a high rate of 1C, its maximum discharge capacity reached 1218 mA h g-1 and its average capacity decreasing rate was only 0.096%/cycle when running over 500 cycles. The interaction mechanism of MnO2 with polysulfides was investigated by adsorption tests and XPS analysis. The excellent electrochemical performance might be due to a combination of adsorption or catalytic properties of MnO2 and the conductivity of carbon materials and PPy.
KeywordsPolypyrrole Manganese dioxide Carbon nanotube Electrochemical performance Lithium–sulfur batteries
This work was supported by the Graduate Freedom Exploration Project Fund of the central south university (no. 502211850).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 6.Ma L, Chen R, Hu Y, Zhang W, Zhu G, Zhao P, Chen T, Wang C, Yan W, Wang Y, Wang L, Tie Z, Liu J, Jin Z (2018) Nanoporous and lyophilic battery separator from regenerated eggshell membrane with effective suppression of dendritic lithium growth. Energy Storage Mater 14:258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2018.04.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Wang HF, Fan CY, Li XY, Wu XL, Li HH, Sun HZ, Xie HM, Zhang JP, Tong CY (2017) Fabrication of boron-doped porous carbon with termite nest shape via natural macromolecule and borax to obtain lithium-sulfur/sodium-ion batteries with improved rate performance. Electrochim Acta 244:86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Zhang PY, Sui ZY, Wang EJ, Liu YW, Han BH (2018) Preparation of hierarchically porous sulfur- and oxygen-co-doped carbon for gas uptake and lithium-ion battery. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 264Google Scholar
- 25.Peng DJ (2011) Preparation and electrochemical performance of S-V_2O_5 composite cathodematerials for lithium/sulfur batteries. Journal of Guilin University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- 26.Lei T, Chen W, Huang J, Yan C, Sun H, Wang C, Zhang W, Li Y, Xiong J (2017) Multi-functional layered WS2 nanosheets for enhancing the performance of lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 7:1601843Google Scholar
- 31.Fang JH, Cao Y, Yang MP, Zheng MS, Dong QF, High-Techcoltd HG (2017) An investigation in the performance of lithium sulfur battery with a TiC coated separator. J ElectrochemGoogle Scholar
- 35.Liu Z, Liu B, Guo P, Shang X, Lv M, Liu D, He D (2018) Enhanced electrochemical kinetics in lithium-sulfur batteries by using carbon nanofibers/manganese dioxide composite as a bifunctional coating on sulfur cathode. Electrochim Acta 269:180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Li Y, Ye D, Liu W, Shi B, Guo R, Zhao H, Pei H, Xu J, Xie J (2016) A MnO2/graphene oxide/multi-walled carbon nanotubes-sulfur composite with dual-efficient polysulfide adsorption for improving lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8Google Scholar
- 48.Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV, Olivier JP, Rodriguezreinoso F, Rouquerol J, Sing KSW (2016) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 38:25–25Google Scholar
- 50.Xiao J, Wang H, Li X, Wang Z, Ma J, Zhao H (2015) N-doped carbon nanotubes as cathode material in Li–S batteries. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 26:1–6Google Scholar
- 51.Gao P, Xu S, Chen Z, Huang X, Bao Z, Lao C, Wu G, Mei Y (2018) Flexible and hierarchically structured sulfur composite cathode based on the carbonized textile for high-performance Li-S batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10Google Scholar
- 57.Yong L, Ye D, Wen L, Shi B, Rui G, Zhao H, Pei H, Xu J, Jing YX (2016) A MnO2/graphene-oxide/multi-walled carbon nanotubes-sulfur composite with dual-efficient polysulfide adsorption for improving lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8Google Scholar
- 58.Li Y, Shi B, Liu W, Guo R, Pei H, Ye D, Xie J, Kong J (2017) Hollow polypyrrole @ MnO 2 spheres as nano-sulfur hosts for improved lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochim ActaGoogle Scholar
- 59.Ni L, Wu Z, Zhao G, Sun C, Zhou C, Gong X, Diao G (2017) Core-shell structure and interaction mechanism of γ-MnO2 coated sulfur for improved lithium-sulfur batteries. Small 13Google Scholar
- 61.Hongfei LI, Wang X, Zhang Y, Yang X (2014) Immobilizing sulfur in high-density 3D graphene gel for high-performance lithium/sulfur battery. In: National Congress on energy storage science and technologyGoogle Scholar