Advertisement

Ionics

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 1147–1156 | Cite as

New approach to adapting electrochemical properties of cation-exchange membrane by incorporating tris(8-hydroxyquinolinato)aluminum nanoparticles

  • S. M. HosseiniEmail author
  • A. Ahmadi
  • B. Van der Bruggen
  • M. R. Jafari
  • Z. Shahedi
  • M. Nemati
Original Paper
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Electrodialysis-mixed matrix tris(8-hydroxyquinolinato)aluminum (AlQ3) nanoparticles entrapped heterogeneous cation-exchange membrane was prepared by the solution casting technique. The effect of the concentration of AlQ3 in the casting solution on the physico-chemical properties of the homemade membranes was studied. AlQ3 nanoparticles were synthesized via a simple precipitation method and characterized by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction. The use of AlQ3 nanoparticles in the membrane matrix led to an increase of the membrane electrical conductivity and surface hydrophilicity. The membrane ion-exchange capacity was enhanced by using AlQ3 loading ratios up to 1.5 wt%; the IEC decreased for concentrations above 1.5 wt%. The increase of AlQ3 content ratios up to 0.5 wt% in fabricated membrane initially caused to increase of water content. The membrane water content was decreased for the concentrations between 0.5 to 1.5 wt% and then showed an increasing trend again at higher additive loading ratios. The membrane potential, charge density, permselectivity, and transport number were improved obviously by the use of AlQ3 nanoparticles in membrane body. The ion flux/permeability enhanced sharply by using of AlQ3 up to 0.5 wt% in the membrane matrix and then began to decrease while the additive concentration was more than 0.5 wt%.

Keywords

Cation-exchange membrane Mixed matrix Tris(8-hydroxyquinolinato)aluminum Electro-ionic properties 

Notes

Funding information

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Arak University for the financial support during this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Cassady HJ, Cimino EC, Kumar M, Hickner MA (2016) Specific ion effects on the permselectivity of sulfonated poly (ether sulfone) cation exchange membranes. J Membr Sci 508:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hosseini SM, Jashni E, Habibi M, Van der Bruggen B (2018) Fabrication of novel electrodialysis heterogeneous ion exchange membranes by incorporating PANI/GO functionalized composite nanoplates. IONICS 24(/6):1789–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kristensen MB, Haldrup S, Christensen JR, Catalano J, Bentien A (2016) Sulfonated poly(arylene thioether sulfone) cation exchange membranes with improved permselectivity/ion conductivity trade-off. J Membr Sci 520:731–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hosseini SM, Jashni E, Amani S, Van der Bruggen B (2017) Tailoring the electrochemical properties of ED ion exchange membranes based on the synergism of TiO2 nanoparticles-co-GO nanoplates. J Colloid Interface Sci 505:763–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nemati M, Hosseini SM, Shabanian M (2017) Novel electrodialysis cation exchange membrane prepared by 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid; heavy metal ions removal. J Hazard Mater 337:90–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hosseini SM, Jashni E, Habibi M, Nemati M, Van der Bruggen B (2017) Evaluating the ion transport characteristics of novel graphene oxide nanoplates entrapped mixed matrix cation exchange membranes in water deionization. J Membr Sci 541:641–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nemati M, Hosseini SM (2017) Adapting the ionic transfer behavior of cation exchange membrane incorporated with SiO2/PAA composite nanoparticles. Ionics 23:3555–3564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nemati M, Hosseini SM, Shabanian M (2017) Developing thin film heterogonous ion exchange membrane modified by 2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid hydrogel-co-super activated carbon nanoparticles coating layer. Kor J Chem Eng 34(6):1813–1821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tong X, Zhang B, Chen Y (2016) Fouling resistant nanocomposite cation exchange membrane with enhanced power generation for reverse electrodialysis. J Membr Sci 516:162–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heidary F, Kharat AN, Khodabakhshi AR (2016) Preparation, characterization and transport properties of novel cation-exchange nanocomposite membrane containing BaFe12O19 nanoparticles. J Clust Sci 27:193–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berezina NP, Kononenko NA, Dyomina OA, Gnusin NP (2008) Characterization of ion-exchange membrane materials: properties vs structure. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 139:3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khan MR, Rafiuddin (2014) Transport phenomena of inorganic-organic cation exchange nanocomposite membrane: a comparative study with different methods. J Nanostruct Chem 4:95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Loza NV, Kononenko NA, Shkirskaya SA, Berezina NP (2006) Effect of modification of ion-exchange membrane MF-4SK on its polarization characteristics. Russ J Electrochem 42:815–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rezaee R, Nasseri S, Mahvi AH, Nabizadeh R, Mousavi SA, Rashidi A, Jafari A, Nazmara S (2015) Fabrication and characterization of a polysulfone-graphene oxide nanocomposite membrane for arsenate rejection from water. J Environ Health Sci Eng 13:61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zuo X, Yu S, Xu X, Bao R, Xu J, Qu W (2009) Preparation of organic–inorganic hybrid cation-exchange membranes via blending method and their electrochemical characterization. J Membr Sci 328:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hosseini SM, Jashni E, Jafari MR, Van der Bruggen B, Shahedi Z (2018) Nanocomposite polyvinyl chloride-based heterogeneous cation exchange membrane prepared by synthesized ZnQ2 nanoparticles: ionic behaviors and morphological characterization. J Membr Sci 560:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rajeswaran M, Blanton TN, Tang CW, Lenhart WC, Switalski SC, Giesen DJ, Antalek BJ, Pawlik TD, Kondakov DY, Zumbulyadis N, Young RH (2009) Structural, thermal, and spectral characterization of the different crystalline forms of AlQ3, tris(quinolin-8-olato)aluminum(III), an electroluminescent material in OLED technology. Polyhedron 28:835–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    El-Nahass MM, Farid AM, Atta AA (2010) Structural and optical properties of tris(8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminum (III) (Alq3) thermal evaporated thin films. J Alloys Compd 507:112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hosseini SM, Madaeni SS, Khodabakhshi AR (2012) The electrochemical characterization of ion exchange membranes in different electrolytic environments: investigation of concentration and pH effects. Sep Sci Technol 47(3):455–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shahedi Z, Jafari MR, Zolanvari AA (2017) Synthesis of ZnQ2, CaQ2 and CdQ2 for application in OLED: optical, thermal, and electrical characterizations. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28:7313–7319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shahedi Z, Jafari MR (2017) Synthesis Al complex and investigating effect of doped ZnO nanoparticles in the electrical and optical efficiency of OLEDS. Appl Phys A 123:98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tanaka Y (2007) Ion exchange membranes: fundamentals and applications, membrane science and technology series, vol 12. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nagarale RK, Shahi VK, Rangarajan R (2005) Preparation of polyvinyl alcohol-silica hybrid heterogeneous anion-exchange membranes by sol-gel method and theircharacterization. J Membr Sci 248:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nagarale RK, Shahi VK, Thampy SK, Rangarajan R (2004) Studies on electrochemical characterization of polycarbonate and polysulfone based heterogeneous cation-exchange membranes. React Funct Polym 61:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khan J, Tripathi BP, Saxena A, Shahi VK (2007) Electrochemical membrane reactor: in situ separation and recovery of chromic acid and metal ions. Electrochim Acta 52(24):6719–6727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sata T (2004) Ion exchange membranes: preparation, characterization, modification and application. the Royal Society of Chemistry, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li X, Wang Z, Lu H, Zhao C, Na H, Zhao C (2005) Electrochemical properties of sulfonated PEEK used for ion exchange membranes. J Membr Sci 254:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brinkmann M, Gadret G, Muccini M, Taliani C, Masciocchi N, Sironi A (2000) Correlation between molecular packing and optical properties in different crystalline polymorphs and amorphous thin films of mer-tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum(III). J Am Chem Soc 122:5147–5157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Curry RJ, Gillin WP, Clarkson J, Batchelder DN (2002) Morphological study of aluminum tris (8-hydroxyquinoline) thin films using infrared and Raman spectroscopy. J Appl Phys 92(4):1902–1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barros KS, Scarazzato T, Espinosa DCR (2018) Evaluation of the effect of the solution concentration and membrane morphology on the transport properties of Cu(II) through two monopolar cation-exchange membranes. Sep Purif Technol 193:184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xu T (2005) Ion exchange membrane: state of their development and perspective. J Membr Sci 263:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nagarale RK, Gohil GS, Shahi VK (2006) Recent developments on ion-exchange membranes and electro-membrane processes. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 119:97–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dlugolecki P, Nymeijer K, Metz S, Wessling M (2008) Current status of ion exchange membranes for power generation from salinity gradients. J Membr Sci 319:214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Hosseini
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Ahmadi
    • 1
  • B. Van der Bruggen
    • 2
    • 3
  • M. R. Jafari
    • 4
  • Z. Shahedi
    • 4
  • M. Nemati
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringArak UniversityArakIran
  2. 2.Process Engineering for Sustainable Systems Section, Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  3. 3.Faculty of Engineering and the Built EnvironmentTshwane University of TechnologyPretoriaSouth Africa
  4. 4.Department of Physics, Faculty of SciencesArak UniversityArakIran

Personalised recommendations