, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 421–427 | Cite as

Micropatterned arrays of vertically-aligned CNTs grown on aluminum as a new cathode platform for LiFePO4 integration in lithium-ion batteries

  • Mesut Yilmaz
  • Supil RainaEmail author
  • Shao-Hua Hsu
  • Weng P. Kang
Original Paper


The conventional lithium-ion battery fabrication process involves mixing of the active cathode material with additives and tape casting on metallic current collectors. The thickness of this layer limits the performance of the cathode. In this work, a novel cathode platform is presented consisting of a micropatterned array of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes (CNTs) on aluminum (Al) foil that serves as host for active cathode powders. This highly conductive three-dimensional structure provides a high specific surface area to support greater mass loading capable of achieving high energy and power densities. The feasibility of this structure was demonstrated by using commercially available lithium iron phosphate (LFP) powder which was processed and dispersed using two different techniques—vibration-assisted drip-coating and electrophoretic deposition. A high specific capacity of 143 mAh/g at 3.4 V was achieved at C/20 rate for the novel cathode fabricated using electrophoretic deposition, which seemed superior to vibration-assisted drip coating with its easier application, more uniform particle coating, stronger particle attachment to the CNTs, and better electrochemical performance. In addition, CNT array on Al has been demonstrated to be a viable candidate for fabricating cathodes for energy storage applications without the need for any additives and/or binders.


CNT Lithium iron phosphate Lithium ion batteries Electrophoretic deposition Renewable energy 



This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.


  1. 1.
    Armand M, Tarascon J-M (2008) Building better batteries. Nature 451:652–657. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Etacheri V, Marom R, Elazari R, Salitra G, Aurbach D (2011) Challenges in the development of advanced li-ion batteries: a review. Energy Environ Sci 4:3243–3262. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cao F, Guo F, Wan L (2011) Better lithium-ion batteries with nanocable-like electrode materials. Energy Environ Sci 4:1634–1642. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahman M (2001) Primary energy efficiency of alternative powertrains in vehicles. Energy 26:973–989. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kang K, Meng YS, Breger J, Grey CP, Ceder G (2006) Electrodes with high power and high capacity for rechargeable Lithium batteries. Science 311:977–980. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tollefson J (2008) Car industry: charging up the future. Nature 456:436–440. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chou SL, Pan Y, Wang JZ, Liu HK, Dou SX (2014) Small things make a big difference: binder effects on the performance of li and Na batteries. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:20347–20359. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gomez J, Kalu EE, Nelson R, Akpovo C, Weatherspoon MH, Zheng JP (2012) Binder-free electrode fabrication by Electroless-electrolytic method. ECS Electrochem Lett 1:D25–D28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luo S, Wang S, Wang J, Jiang K, Li Q, Fan S (2012) Binder-free LiCoO2/carbon nanotube cathodes for high-performance Lithium ion batteries. Adv Mater 24:2294–2298. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guerfi A, Kaneko M, Petitclerc M, Mori M, Zaghib K (2007) LiFePO4 water-soluble binder electrode for li-ion batteries. J Power Sources 163:1047–1052. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daniel, C (2015) Lithium ion batteries and their manufacturing challenges. In: Anseth, KS (ed) The Bridge, 45 (1), National Academies of Engineering, Washington D.C., pp 21–24Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Golubkov AW, Fuchs D, Wagner J, Wiltsche H, Stangl C, Fauler G, Voitice G, Thalera A, Hacker V (2014) Thermal-runaway experiments on consumer li-ion batteries with metal-oxide and olivine-type cathodes. RSC Adv 4:3633–3642. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zeng Y, Gao G, Wu G, Yang H (2015) Nanosheet-structured vanadium pentoxide thin film as a carbon- and binder-free cathode for lithium-ion battery applications. J Solid State Electrochem 19:3319–3328. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lalia BS, Shah T, Hashaikeh R (2015) Microbundles of carbon nanostructures as binder free highly conductive matrix for LiFePO4 battery cathode. J Power Sources 278:314–319. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sreelakshmi KV, Sasi S, Balakrishnan A, Sivakumar N, Nair AS, Nair SV, Subramanian KRV (2014) Hybrid composites of LiMn2O4–graphene as rechargeable electrodes in energy storage devices. Energy Technol 2:257–262. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang Y, Liu H, Lu YC, Hou Y, Li Q (2015) Electrophoretic lithium iron phosphate/reduced graphene oxide composite for lithium ion battery cathode application. J Power Sources 284:236–244. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    MTI Corporation, LiFePO4 (Phosphate) Powder for Li-ion Battery Cathode, MTIXTL, , Accessed 15 December 2017
  18. 18.
    Hooijdonk EV, Bittencourt C, Snyders R, Colomer JF (2013) Functionalization of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 4:129–152. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gately RD, Panhuis MIH (2015) Filling of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 6:508–516. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boncel S, Walczak KZ, Koziol KKK (2011) Dynamics of capillary infiltration of liquids into a highly aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube film. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2:311–317. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chakraborty I, Singh N, Gohil S, Ghosh S, Ayyub P (2013) Clustered copper nanorod arrays: a new class of adhesive hydrophobic materials. Soft Matter 9:11513–11520. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chandra D, Yang S, Soshinsky AA, Gambogi RJ (2009) Biomimetic ultrathin whitening by capillary-force-induced random clustering of hydrogel micropillar arrays. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 1:1698–1704. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang J, Wang J, Tang Y, Wang D, Li X, Hu Y, Li R, Liang G, Shamb TK, Sun X (2013) LiFePO4–graphene as a superior cathode material for rechargeable lithium batteries: impact of stacked graphene and unfolded graphene. Energy Environ Sci 6:1521–1528. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pan F, Wang W, Chen D, Yan W (2011) Influence of LiFePO4/C interface on electrochemical properties. J Mater Chem 21:14680–14684. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Luo WB, Chou SL, Zhai YC, Liu HK (2014) Self-assembled graphene and LiFePO4 composites with superior high rate capability for lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 2:4927–4931. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mohan EH, Siddhartha V, Gopalan R et al (2014) Urea and sucrose assisted combustion synthesis of LiFePO4/C nano-powder for lithium-ion battery cathode application. AIMS. Mater Sci 1:191–201. Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Delacourt C, Poizot P, Levasseur S, Masquelier C (2006) Size effects on carbon-free LiFePO4 powders. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 9:A352. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nayak PK, Grinblat J, Levi M et al (2014) TEM and Raman spectroscopy evidence of layered to spinel phase transformation in layered LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 upon cycling to higher voltages. J Electroanal Chem 733:6–19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Howey DA, Mitcheson PD, Yufit V, Offer GJ, Brandon NP (2014) Online measurement of battery impedance using motor controller excitation. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 63:2557–2566. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Macdonald DD (2006) Reflections on the history of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Electrochim Acta 51:1376–1388. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mesut Yilmaz
    • 1
  • Supil Raina
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shao-Hua Hsu
    • 1
  • Weng P. Kang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations