Advertisement

Ionics

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 309–317 | Cite as

Simple preparation of gold nanoparticle-decorated copper cross-linked pectin for the sensitive determination of hydrogen peroxide

  • Karuppasamy Kohila rani
  • Yi-Xin Liu
  • Rajkumar DevasenathipathyEmail author
  • Chieh Yang
  • Sea-Fue WangEmail author
Original Paper
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

The synthesis of highly stable metallic organic–inorganic hybrid nanocomposites from the non-toxic and biodegradable organic–inorganic metallic precursors, which are the natural polymer products of organic molecules, carbohydrates, and amino acids, has engrossed the recent researchers. In this work, a simple potentiostatic approach has been designed for the electrochemical preparation of gold nanoparticle-decorated copper cross-linked pectin (CuCP–AuNPs). Here, CuCP act as a scaffold or stabilizing agent for the preparation of uniform AuNPs. The studies for surface morphology and crystal structure of our composite were carried out using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and X-ray diffraction spectroscopy (XRD). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was employed for the elemental analysis of the composite. A remarkable cathodic peak current response was obtained by our modified electrode for the presence of H2O2. CuCP–AuNP-modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) possesses the values for limits of detection (LOD) and sensitivity of 0.22 μΜ and 6800 μA mM cm−2, respectively, in a linear range from 1 to 2110 μΜ. The detection of H2O2 in presence of other biologically interfering molecules represents the high selectivity of our fabricated electrode. The examination for the sensitive determination of H2O2 conducted in commercially available lens cleaning solutions validates the practical feasibility of the proposed modified electrode.

Keywords

Copper cross-linked pectin Gold nanoparticles Hydrogen peroxide Clinical lens cleaning solutions Cyclic voltammetry Amperometry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Dr. Rajkumar Devasenathipathy gratefully acknowledges National Taipei University of Technology, Taiwan, for the postdoctoral fellowship.

Supplementary material

11581_2018_2573_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (54 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 53 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Rani KK, Devasenathipathy R, Wang S-F, Yang C (2017) Simple preparation of birnessite-type MnO2 nanoflakes with multi-walled carbon nanotubes for the sensitive detection of hydrogen peroxide. Ionics 23(11):3219–3226Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cui K, Song Y, Yao Y, Huang Z, Wang L (2008) A novel hydrogen peroxide sensor based on Ag nanoparticles electrodeposited on DNA-networks modified glassy carbon electrode. Electrochem Commun 10(4):663–667Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ksibi M (2006) Chemical oxidation with hydrogen peroxide for domestic wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 119(2–3):161–165Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mollarasouli F, Asadpour-Zeynali K, Campuzano S, Yáñez-Sedeño P, Pingarrón JM (2017) Non-enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensor based on graphene quantum dots-chitosan/methylene blue hybrid nanostructures. Electrochim Acta 246:303–314Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sun X, Odyniec ML, Sedgwick AC, Lacina K, Xu S, Qiang T, Bull SD, Marken F, James TD (2017) Reaction-based indicator displacement assay (RIA) for the colorimetric and fluorometric detection of hydrogen peroxide. Org Chem Front 4(6):1058–1062Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hasan SK, Asaduzzaman M, Merkyte V, Morozova K, Scampicchio M (2018) Simultaneous kinetic and thermodynamic-based assay to determine the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) scavenging activity of berry extracts by using reaction calorimetry. Food Anal Methods 11(2):432–439Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Song M, Wang J, Chen B, Wang L (2017) A facile, nonreactive hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) detection method enabled by ion chromatography with UV detector. Anal Chem 89(21):11537–11544Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seven O, Sozmen F, Turan IS (2017) Self immolative dioxetane based chemiluminescent probe for H2O2 detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem 239:1318–1324Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tang B, Wang Y, Liang H, Chen Z, He X, Shen H (2006) Studies on the oxidation reaction of tyrosine (Tyr) with H2O2 catalyzed by horseradish peroxidase (HRP) in alcohol–water medium by spectrofluorimetry and differential spectrophotometry. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 63(3):609–613Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klassen NV, Marchington D, McGowan HC (1994) H2O2 determination by the I3-method and by KMnO4 titration. Anal Chem 66(18):2921–2925Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Asif SAB, Khan SB, Asiri AM (2017) Assessment of graphene oxide/MgAl oxide nanocomposite as a non-enzymatic sensor for electrochemical quantification of hydrogen peroxide. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 74:255–262Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sherino B, Mohamad S, Halim SNA, Manan NSA (2018) Electrochemical detection of hydrogen peroxide on a new microporous Ni–metal organic framework material-carbon paste electrode. Sensors Actuators B Chem 254:1148–1156Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Devasenathipathy R, Kohilarani K, Chen S-M, Wang S-F, Wang S-C, Chen C-K (2016) Electrochemical preparation of biomolecule stabilized copper nanoparticles decorated reduced graphene oxide for the sensitive and selective determination of hydrogen peroxide. Electrochim Acta 191:55–61Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang C, Jiang H, Ma R, Zhang Y, Chen Q (2017) Simple non-enzymatic electrochemical sensor for hydrogen peroxide based on nafion/platinum nanoparticles/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode. Ionics 23(5):1309–1317Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bai W, Zheng J, Sheng Q (2013) A non-enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensor based on Ag/MnOOH nanocomposites. Electroanalysis 25(10):2305–2311Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ensafi AA, Zandi-Atashbar N, Ghiaci M, Taghizadeh M, Rezaei B (2015) Synthesis of new copper nanoparticle-decorated anchored type ligands: applications as non-enzymatic electrochemical sensors for hydrogen peroxide. Mater Sci Eng C 47:290–297Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Janyasupab M, Liu C-W, Zhang Y, Wang K-W, Liu C-C (2013) Bimetallic Pt–M (M= Cu, Ni, Pd, and Rh) nanoporous for H2O2 based amperometric biosensors. Sensors Actuators B Chem 179:209–214Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen L, Fujita T, Ding Y, Chen M (2010) A three-dimensional gold-decorated nanoporous copper core–shell composite for electrocatalysis and nonenzymatic biosensing. Adv Funct Mater 20(14):2279–2285Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu L, Huang Z, Wang D, Scholz R, Pippel E (2011) The fabrication of nanoporous Pt-based multimetallic alloy nanowires and their improved electrochemical durability. Nanotechnology 22(10):105604Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Noh H-B, Lee K-S, Chandra P, Won M-S, Shim Y-B (2012) Application of a Cu–Co alloy dendrite on glucose and hydrogen peroxide sensors. Electrochim Acta 61:36–43Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Upadhyay S, Rao GR, Sharma MK, Bhattacharya BK, Rao VK, Vijayaraghavan R (2009) Immobilization of acetylcholineesterase–choline oxidase on a gold–platinum bimetallic nanoparticles modified glassy carbon electrode for the sensitive detection of organophosphate pesticides, carbamates and nerve agents. Biosens Bioelectron 25(4):832–838Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Easow JS, Selvaraju T (2013) Unzipped catalytic activity of copper in realizing bimetallic Ag@ Cu nanowires as a better amperometric H2O2 sensor. Electrochim Acta 112:648–654Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gholivand MB, Azadbakht A (2011) A novel hydrazine electrochemical sensor based on a zirconium hexacyanoferrate film-bimetallic Au–Pt inorganic–organic hybrid nanocomposite onto glassy carbon-modified electrode. Electrochim Acta 56(27):10044–10054Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ni Y, Song H, Kokot S (2013) A novel electrochemical method for the analysis of hydrogen peroxide with the use of a glassy carbon electrode modified by a Prussian blue/copper-gold bimetallic nanoparticles hybrid film. Electroanalysis 25(9):2211–2220Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li X, Du X (2017) Molybdenum disulfide nanosheets supported Au-Pd bimetallic nanoparticles for non-enzymatic electrochemical sensing of hydrogen peroxide and glucose. Sensors Actuators B Chem 239:536–543Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Uzunoglu A, Scherbarth AD, Stanciu LA (2015) Bimetallic PdCu/SPCE non-enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensors. Sensors Actuators B Chem 220:968–976Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li L, Niu R, Zhang Y (2018) Ag–Au bimetallic nanocomposites stabilized with organic–inorganic hybrid microgels: synthesis and their regulated optical and catalytic properties. RSC Adv 8(22):12428–12438Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhou Q, Lin Y, Zhang K, Li M, Tang D (2018) Reduced graphene oxide/BiFeO3 nanohybrids-based signal-on photoelectrochemical sensing system for prostate-specific antigen detection coupling with magnetic microfluidic device. Biosens Bioelectron 101:146–152Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang K, Lv S, Lin Z, Li M, Tang D (2018) Bio-bar-code-based photoelectrochemical immunoassay for sensitive detection of prostate-specific antigen using rolling circle amplification and enzymatic biocatalytic precipitation. Biosens Bioelectron 101:159–166Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Qiu Z, Shu J, Tang D (2017) Near-infrared-to-ultraviolet light-mediated photoelectrochemical aptasensing platform for cancer biomarker based on core–shell NaYF4: Yb, Tm@ TiO2 upconversion microrods. Anal Chem 90(1):1021–1028Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ahrabi SF, Madsen G, Dyrstad K, Sande SA, Graffner C (2000) Development of pectin matrix tablets for colonic delivery of model drug ropivacaine. Eur J Pharm Sci 10(1):43–52Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gong J-L, Wang X-Y, Zeng G-M, Chen L, Deng J-H, Zhang X-R, Niu Q-Y (2012) Copper (II) removal by pectin–iron oxide magnetic nanocomposite adsorbent. Chem Eng J 185:100–107Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Devasenathipathy R, Karuppiah C, Chen S-M, Mani V, Vasantha VS, Ramaraj S (2015) Highly selective determination of cysteine using a composite prepared from multiwalled carbon nanotubes and gold nanoparticles stabilized with calcium crosslinked pectin. Microchim Acta 182(3–4):727–735Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Seslija S, Veljovic D, Krusic MK, Stevanovic J, Velickovic S, Popovic I (2016) Cross-linking of highly methoxylated pectin with copper: the specific anion influence. New J Chem 40(2):1618–1625Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Venkatakrishnan S, Veerappan G, Elamparuthi E, Veerappan A (2014) Aerobic synthesis of biocompatible copper nanoparticles: promising antibacterial agent and catalyst for nitroaromatic reduction and C–N cross coupling reaction. RSC Adv 4(29):15003–15006Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Khazaei A, Khazaei M, Rahmati S (2015) A green method for the synthesis of gelatin/pectin stabilized palladium nano-particles as efficient heterogeneous catalyst for solvent-free Mizoroki–Heck reaction. J Mol Catal A Chem 398:241–247Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen D, Yang K, Wang H, Zhou J, Zhang H (2015) Cr (VI) removal by combined redox reactions and adsorption using pectin-stabilized nanoscale zero-valent iron for simulated chromium contaminated water. RSC Adv 5(80):65068–65073Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Devasenathipathy R, Mani V, Chen S-M, Arulraj D, Vasantha V (2014) Highly stable and sensitive amperometric sensor for the determination of trace level hydrazine at cross linked pectin stabilized gold nanoparticles decorated graphene nanosheets. Electrochim Acta 135:260–269Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Das S, Chaudhury A, Ng K-Y (2011) Preparation and evaluation of zinc–pectin–chitosan composite particles for drug delivery to the colon: role of chitosan in modifying in vitro and in vivo drug release. Int J Pharm 406(1–2):11–20Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vilhena C, Goncalves M, Mota A (2004) Binding of copper (II) to pectins by electrochemical methods. Electroanalysis 16(24):2065–2072Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jia N, Huang B, Chen L, Tan L, Yao S (2014) A simple non-enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensor using gold nanoparticles-graphene-chitosan modified electrode. Sensors Actuators B Chem 195:165–170Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kamyabi MA, Hajari N, Babaei N, Moharramnezhad M, Yahiro H (2017) Silica template electrodeposition of copper oxide nanostructures on Ni foam as an ultrasensitive non-enzymatic glucose sensor. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 81:21–30Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tian L, Zhong X, Hu W, Liu B, Li Y (2014) Fabrication of cubic PtCu nanocages and their enhanced electrocatalytic activity towards hydrogen peroxide. Nanoscale Res Lett 9(1):68Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang J, Gao H, Sun F, Xu C (2014) Nanoporous PtAu alloy as an electrochemical sensor for glucose and hydrogen peroxide. Sensors Actuators B Chem 191:612–618Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Xu J, Wei X-W, Song X-J, Lu X-J, Ji C-C, Ni Y-H, Zhao G-C (2007) Synthesis and electrocatalytic activity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/Cu–Ag nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 42(16):6972–6976Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lin D, Li Y, Zhang P, Zhang W, Ding J, Li J, Wei G, Su Z (2016) Fast preparation of MoS 2 nanoflowers decorated with platinum nanoparticles for electrochemical detection of hydrogen peroxide. RSC Adv 6(58):52739–52745Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Xu C, Liu Y, Su F, Liu A, Qiu H (2011) Nanoporous PtAg and PtCu alloys with hollow ligaments for enhanced electrocatalysis and glucose biosensing. Biosens Bioelectron 27(1):160–166Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Huang B, Wang Y, Lu Z, Du H, Ye J (2017) One pot synthesis of palladium-cobalt nanoparticles over carbon nanotubes as a sensitive non-enzymatic sensor for glucose and hydrogen peroxide detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem 252:1016–1025Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhou J, Zhao Y, Bao J, Huo D, Fa H, Shen X, Hou C (2017) One-step electrodeposition of au-Pt bimetallic nanoparticles on MoS2 nanoflowers for hydrogen peroxide enzyme-free electrochemical sensor. Electrochim Acta 250:152–158Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials and Mineral Resources EngineeringNational Taipei University of TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations