Advertisement

Ionics

, Volume 24, Issue 10, pp 3199–3207 | Cite as

Leafy copper-cobalt nanostructures/three-dimensional porous carbon for glucose sensing

  • Longfei Miao
  • Yihan Ye
  • Lijuan Xu
  • Canwei Peng
  • Bingxian Peng
  • Ping Li
  • Shouhui Chen
Original Paper
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

A novel non-enzymatic glucose sensor was developed by electrodepositing leafy copper-cobalt nanostructures (Cu–Co NSs) on the persimmon-derived three-dimensional macroporous carbon (PD3DMC). The electrochemical behaviors and the electrocatalytic performances towards the oxidation of glucose of the Cu–Co NSs/PD3DMC were evaluated by cyclic voltammograms, chronoamperometry, and amperometric method. Compared with the sensors based on monometal Cu or Co, the Cu–Co NSs/PD3DMC sensor based on bimetal exhibited good electrocatalytic activity towards the oxidation of glucose. The effects of the electrodeposition potential and the molar ratio of Cu2+ and Co2+ in the electrodeposition solution on the electrocatalytic performance of the resulted Cu–Co NSs/PD3DMC were explored in detail. The optimum catalytic activity of the sensor towards the oxidation of glucose can achieve under the optimized conditions the electrodepositing potential of − 1.2 V and the Cu2+/Co2+ molar ratio of 1:20. The catalytic current density was linear to the glucose concentration in the range of 0.002–2.73 mM (R = 0.9977) with a sensitivity of 2.21 mA cm−2 mM−1 and a detection limit of 0.7 μM.

Keywords

Cu–Co bimetallic nanostructures Persimmon-derived macroporous carbon Glucose Electrochemical sensor 

Notes

Funding information

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21765009 and 21465015), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20143ACB21016), and Scientific Research Foundation of Jiangxi Education Commission (GJJ160288).

Supplementary material

11581_2018_2514_MOESM1_ESM.doc (474 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 474 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Beni V, Nilsson D, Arven P, Norberg P, Gustafsson G, Turner AP (2015) Printed electrochemical instruments for biosensors. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol 4:3001–3005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nery EW, Kundys M, Jelen PS, önsson-Niedziółka MJ (2016) Electrochemical glucose sensing: is there still room for improvement? Anal Chem 88:11271–11282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lu P, Lei YT, Lu SJ, Wang Q, Liu QB (2015) Three-dimensional roselike alpha-Ni(OH)2 assembled from nanosheet building blocks for non-enzymatic glucose detection. Anal Chim Acta 880:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumar TR, Babu KJ, Yoo DJ, Kim AR, Kumar GG (2015) Binder free and free-standing electrospun membrane architecture for sensitive and selective non-enzymatic glucose sensors. RSC Adv 5:41457–41467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Makaram P, Owens D, Aceros J (2014) Trends in nanomaterial-based non-invasive diabetes sensing technologies. Diagnostics 4:27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wei H, Wang EK (2013) Nanomaterials with enzyme-like characteristics (nanozymes): next-generation artificial enzymes. Chem Soc Rev 42:6060–6093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karakoti A, Singh S, Dowding JM, Seal S, Self WT (2010) Redox-active radical scavenging nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 39:4422–4432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shu HH, Chang G, Su J, Cao LL, Huang QW, Zhang YT (2015) Single-step electrochemical deposition of high performance Au-graphene nanocomposites for nonenzymatic glucose sensing. Sensors Actuators B Chem 220:331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ke X, Xu YT, Yu CC, Zhao J, Cui GF, Higgins D (2014) Nanoporous gold on three-dimensional nickel foam: an efficient hybrid electrode for hydrogen peroxide electroreduction in acid media. J Power Sources 269:461–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang GH, Luo YL, Lu WB, Qin XY, Sun XP (2014) Carbon nanoparticles-induced formation of polyaniline nanofibers and their subsequent decoration with Ag nanoparticles for nonenzymatic H2O2 detection. Russ J Electrochem 50:95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhao S, Wang TT, Wang LL, Xu SK (2015) A non-enzymatic glucose amperometric biosensor based on a simple one-step electrodeposition of Cu microdendrites onto single-walled carbon nanohorn-modified electrode. J Solid State Electrochem 19:831–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin KC, Lin YC, Chen SM (2013) A highly sensitive nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes decorated with nickel and copper nanoparticles. Electrochim Acta 96:164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ensafi AA, Jafari-Asl M, Dorostkar N, Ghiaci M, Martinez-Huerta MV, Fierro JL (2014) The fabrication and characterization of Cu-nanoparticle immobilization on a hybrid chitosan derivative-carbon support as a novel electrochemical sensor: application for the sensitive enzymeless oxidation of glucose and reduction of hydrogen peroxide. J Mater Chem B 2:706–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fan ZJ, Liu B, Liu XH, Li ZP, Wang HG, Yang SR (2013) A flexible and disposable hybrid electrode based on Cu nanowires modified graphene transparent electrode for non-enzymatic glucose sensor. Electrochim Acta 109:602–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khalid B, Meng QH, Cao B (2015) A non-enzymatic thermally reduced Cu nanoparticle based graphene-resorcinol benzaldehyde glucose sensor. Mater Res Innov 19:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang GF, Zhu YH, Nan HH, Ma WQ, Zhang XJ (2013) Study on porous Cu-based enzyme-free glucose electrochemical sensor with different entrapping agents. Micro Nano Lett 8:395–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoa LT, Sun KG, Hur SH (2015) Highly sensitive non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on Pt nanoparticle decorated graphene oxide hydrogel. Sensors Actuators B Chem 210:618–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chang G, Shu HH, Huang QW, Oyama M, Ji K, Liu X (2015) Synthesis of highly dispersed Pt nanoclusters anchored graphene composites and their application for non-enzymatic glucose sensing. Electrochim Acta 157:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhao Y, Bo XJ, Guo LP (2015) Highly exposed copper oxide supported on three-dimensional porous reduced graphene oxide for non-enzymatic detection of glucose. Electrochim Acta 176:1272–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xu WN, Dai S, Wang X, He XM, Wang MJ, Xi Y (2015) Nanorod-aggregated flower-like CuO grown on a carbon fiber fabric for a super high sensitive non-enzymatic glucose sensor. J Mater Chem B 3:5777–5785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun F, Zhu RH, Jiang HW, Huang HL, Liu P, Zheng YJ (2015) Synthesis of novel CuO nanosheets with porous structure and their non-enzymatic glucose sensing applications. Electroanalysis 27:1238–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fan Y, Yang X, Cao Z, Chen SF, Zhu B (2015) Synthesis of mesoporous CuO microspheres with core-in-hollow-shell structure and its application for non-enzymatic sensing of glucose. J Appl Electrochem 45:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen J, Sheng QL, Zheng JB (2015) Dispersed gold nanoparticles on NiO coated with polypyrrole for non-enzymic amperometric sensing of glucose. RSC Adv 5:105372–105378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cui ZZ, Yin HY, Nie QL, Qin DY, Wu WW, He XL (2015) Hierarchical flower-like NiO hollow microspheres for non-enzymatic glucose sensors. J Electroanal Chem 757:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu H, Wu XL, Yang B, Li ZJ, Lei LC, Zhang XW (2015) Three-dimensional porous NiO nanosheets vertically grown on graphite disks for enhanced performance non-enzymatic glucose sensor. Electrochim Acta 174:745–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang L, Lu XP, Wen CJ, Xie YZ, Miao LF, Chen SH, Li HB, Li P, Song YH (2015) One-step synthesis of Pt–NiO nanoplate array/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for nonenzymatic glucose sensing. J Mater Chem A 3:608–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shen CC, Su J, Li XZ, Luo JJ, Yang MH (2015) Electrochemical sensing platform based on Pd-Au bimetallic cluster for non-enzymatic detection of glucose. Sensors Actuators B Chem 209:695–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sun YL, Yang HY, Yu XH, Meng HW, Xu XH (2015) A novel non-enzymatic amperometric glucose sensor based on a hollow Pt-Ni alloy nanotube array electrode with enhanced sensitivity. RSC Adv 5:70387–70394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ma DQ, Tang XN, Guo MQ, Lu HR, Xu XH (2015) Fabrication and characterization of non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on bimetallic hollow Ag/Pt nanoparticles prepared by galvanic replacement reaction. Ionics 21:1417–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Balamurugan J, Thanh TD, Heo SB, Kim NH, Lee JH (2015) Novel route to synthesis of N-doped graphene/Cu-Ni oxide composite for high electrochemical performance. Carbon 94:962–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tsang CH, Hui KN, Hui KS (2017) Electrooxidation of glucose by binder-free bimetallic Pd1Ptx/graphene aerogel/nickel foam composite electrodes with low metal loading in basic medium. Electrochim Acta 258:371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu Y, Wang DP, Deng CY, Huo LX, Wang LJ, Cao S (2014) Feasibility study on preparation of coatings on Ti-6Al-4V by combined ultrasonic impact treatment and electrospark deposition. Mater Des 63:488–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vilana J, Lorenzo M, Gomez E, Valles E (2015) Electrochemical deposition of CoNi micro/nanostructures as new materials for electrochemical sensing of glucose. Mater Lett 159:154–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gong CC, Shen Y, Chen JY, Song YG, Chen SL, Song YH, Wang L (2017) Microperoxidase-11@PCN-333 (Al)/three-dimensional macroporous carbon electrode for sensing hydrogen peroxide. Sensors Actuators B Chem 239:890–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Feng DW, Liu TF, Su J, Bosch M, Wei ZW, Wan W, Yuan DQ, Chen YP, Wang X, Wang KC, Lian XZ, Gu ZY, Park J, Zou XD, Zhou HC (2015) Stable metal-organic frameworks containing single-molecule traps for enzyme encapsulation. Nat Commun 6:1–8Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gong CC, Chen JY, Shen Y, Song YG, Song YH, Wang L (2016) Microperoxidase-11/metal–organic framework/macroporous carbon for detecting hydrogen peroxide. RSC Adv 6:79798–79804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xu YQ, Chu ZY, Shi L, Pen JM, Jin WQ (2015) Prussian blue nanocubes decorated three-dimensional silver nanowires network for high-performance electrochemical biosensing. Sensors Actuators B Chem 221:1009–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chu Y, Shi L, Zhang YN, Jin WQ, Warren S, Ward D, Dempsey E (2012) Single layer prussian blue grid as a versatile enzyme trap for low-potential biosensors. J Mater Chem 22:14874–14879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liu YS, Zhao YA, Zhang YY (2014) One-step green synthesized fluorescent carbon nanodots from bamboo leaves for copper(II) ion detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem 196:647–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Li M, Zhao Z, Liu XT, Xiong YP, Han C, Zhang YF (2015) Novel bamboo leaf shaped CuO nanorod@hollow carbon fibers derived from plant biomass for efficient and nonenzymatic glucose detection. Analyst 140:6412–6420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lu XP, Hu YT, Wang L, Guo QH, Chen SL, Chen SH (2016) Macroporous carbon/nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes/polyaniline nanocomposites and their application in supercapacitors. Electrochim Acta 189:158–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang L, Zheng YL, Lu XP, Li Z, Sun LL, Song YH (2014) Dendritic copper-cobalt nanostructures/reduced graphene oxide-chitosan modified glassy carbon electrode for glucose sensing. Sensors Actuators B Chem 195:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chen D, Feng HB, Li JH (2012) Graphene oxide: preparation, functionalization, and electrochemical applications. Chem Rev 112:6027–6053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Noh HB, Lee KS, Chandra P, Won MS, Shim YB (2012) Application of a Cu-Co alloy dendrite on glucose and hydrogen peroxide sensors. Electrochim Acta 61:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mahshid SS, Mahshid S, Dolati A, Ghorbani M, Yang L, Luo S (2011) Template-based electrodeposition of Pt/Ni nanowires and its catalytic activity towards glucose oxidation. Electrochim Acta 58:551–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhang YC, Liu YX, Su L, Zhang ZH, Hu DQ, Hou CJ, Lei Y (2014) CuO nanowires based sensitive and selective non-enzymatic glucose detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem 191:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liu GY, Zheng BZ, Jiang YS, Cai YQ, Du J, Yuan HY (2012) Improvement of sensitive CuO NFs-ITO nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on in situ electrospun fiber. Talanta 101:24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang L, Lu XP, Ye YJ, Sun LL, Song YH (2013) Nickel-cobalt nanostructures coated reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite electrode for nonenzymatic glucose biosensing. Electrochim Acta 114:484–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Li XL, Yao JY, Liu FL, He HC, Zhou M, Mao N (2013) Nickel/copper nanoparticles modified TiO2 nanotubes for non-enzymatic glucose biosensors. Sensors Actuators B Chem 181:501–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang CX, Yin LW, Zhang LY, Gao R (2010) Ti/TiO2 nanotube array/Ni composite electrodes for nonenzymatic amperometric glucose sensing. J Phys Chem C 114:4408−4413Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wang ZG, Hu Y, Yang W, Zhou MJ, Hu X (2012) Facile one-step microwave-assisted route towards Ni nanospheres/reduced graphene oxide hybrids for non-enzymatic glucose sensing. Sensors 12:4860−4869Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Li SJ, Hou LL, Yuan BQ, Chang MZ, Ma Y, Du JM (2016) Enzyme-free glucose sensor using a glassy carbon electrode modified with reduced graphene oxide decorated with mixed copper and cobalt oxides. Microchim Acta 183:1813–1821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Liu SD, Hui KS, Hui KN (2016) Flower-like copper cobaltite nanosheets on graphite paper as high performance supercapacitor electrodes and enzymeless glucose sensors. Appl Mater Interfaces 8:3258–3267CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Longfei Miao
    • 1
  • Yihan Ye
    • 1
  • Lijuan Xu
    • 1
  • Canwei Peng
    • 1
  • Bingxian Peng
    • 1
  • Ping Li
    • 1
  • Shouhui Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Functional Small Organic Molecule, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Jiangxi Province, College of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringJiangxi Normal UniversityNanchangChina

Personalised recommendations