Advertisement

Journal of Business Economics

, Volume 89, Issue 8–9, pp 1097–1147 | Cite as

Learning from failures in business model innovation: solving decision-making logic conflicts through intrapreneurial effectuation

  • Sebastian BrenkEmail author
  • Dirk Lüttgens
  • Kathleen Diener
  • Frank Piller
Original Paper

Abstract

Established organizations need to adapt their current business models (BMs) to match dynamic changes in their environment. Alternatives to the established BM usually incorporate a different logic of how value is created, offered, and captured. When selecting and implementing the best BM alternative, organizations have to make decisions on several highly uncertain questions: What will the future look like, on what basis should we take action, how do we act under risks and limited resources, and how should we behave in light of unexpected events and towards outsiders. Firms can apply the logic of causation or that of effectuation when making these decisions. In this context, we apply a longitudinal single case study of a manufacturing company encountering a digital transformation journey. In this case study, we investigate the shift from a product-based to a smart service model and the underlying process of decision-making in the context of business model innovation (BMI). From our case study, we identify latent conflicts resulting from two different BM logics: the logic of value offering, creation, and capture of the dominant (established) BM versus that of the new one. We show that logic conflicts become especially visible when actors cannot reduce uncertainty about the new BM effectively. These conflicts finally inhibit the change of the dominant BM to the new one. Sensemaking in the company about the latent logic conflicts within the BMI process reveals the need to change its decision-making logic from managerial causation to intrapreneurial effectuation. The findings from our study contribute to entrepreneurship and institutional theory while highlighting the concept of institutional intrapreneurship for BMI. Our results suggest separating the alternative BM from the existing one. This separation can reduce cognitive uncertainty associated with BMI processes through logic pluralism, i.e., building a new decision-making logic in parallel to the old one. We contribute to the BMI literature by adding logic conflicts of BMI and the decision-making logic of an organization to the list of important contingency factors that influence the execution and outcome of a BMI process.

Keywords

Business model innovation Digital transformation/Digitization Institutional theory Effectuation Causation Sensemaking Institutional entrepreneurship Institutional logic Family business Value migration Pivoting Longitudinal single case study Mixed-method Logic pluralism 

JEL Classification

M13 M15 O32 O33 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the German Research Council (DFG) for their support within the Cluster "Internet of Production", Project ID 390 621 612.

References

  1. Amaratunga D, Baldry D (2001) Case study methodology as a means of theory building: performance measurement in facilities management organisations. Work Study 50:95–105Google Scholar
  2. Arend RJ, Sarooghi H, Burkemper A (2015) Effectuation As Ineffectual? Applying the 3E theory-assessment framework to a proposed new theory of entrepreneurship. Acad Manag Rev 40:630–651.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold C, Kiel D, Voigt K-I (2016) How the industrial internet of things changes business models in different manufacturing industries. Int J Innov Manag 20:1640015Google Scholar
  4. Bammens Y, Voordeckers W, van Gils A (2011) Boards of directors in family businesses: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 13:134–152.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00289.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Battilana J (2006) Agency and institutions: the enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization 13:653–676Google Scholar
  6. Battilana J, Leca B, Boxenbaum E (2009) 2 how actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Acad Manag Ann 3:65–107Google Scholar
  7. Berends H, Jelinek M, Reymen I, Stultiëns R (2014) Product innovation processes in small firms: combining entrepreneurial effectuation and managerial causation. J Prod Innov Manag 31:616–635.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berends H, Smits A, Reymen I, Podoynitsyna K (2016) Learning while (re)configuring: business model innovation processes in established firms. Strateg Org 14:181–219.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016632758 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berglund H (2015) Between cognition and discourse: phenomenology and the study of entrepreneurship. Int J Entrep Behav Res 21:472–488.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2013-0210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyatzis RE (1998) Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  11. Brady HE, Collier D (eds) (2010) Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards, 2nd edn. Rowman and Littlefield, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  12. Brettel M, Mauer R, Engelen A, Küpper D (2012) Corporate effectuation: entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. J Bus Ventur 27:167–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buliga O, Scheiner CW, Voigt K-I (2016) Business model innovation and organizational resilience: towards an integrated conceptual framework. J Bus Econ 86:647–670.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0796-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Casadesus-Masanell R, Ricart JE (2010) From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Plan 43:195–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Casadesus-Masanell R, Zhu F (2013) Business model innovation and competitive imitation: the case of sponsor-based business models. Strateg Manag J 34:464–482.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clauss T (2017) Measuring business model innovation: conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Manag 47:385–403Google Scholar
  17. Chandler GN, DeTienne DR, McKelvie A, Mumford TV (2011) Causation and effectuation processes: a validation study. J Bus Ventur 26:375–390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chesbrough H (2007) Business model innovation: it's not just about technology anymore. Strat Leadersh 35:12–17.  https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570710833714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chesbrough H (2010) Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan 43:354–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chiles TH, Gupta VK, Bluedorn AC (2008) On Lachmannian and effectual entrepreneurship: a rejoinder to Sarasvathy and Dew (2008). Org Stud 29:247–253.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE (1999) An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Acad Manag Rev 24:522–537Google Scholar
  22. Dew N, Read S, Sarasvathy SD, Wiltbank R (2009) Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: differences between experts and novices. J Bus Ventur 24:287–309.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duriau VJ, Reger RK, Pfarrer MD (2007) A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Org Res Methods 10:5–34.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106289252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fisher G (2012) Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: a behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrep Theory Pract 36:1019–1051.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foss NJ, Saebi T (2017) Fifteen years of research on business model innovation. J Manag 43:200–227.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franke T, zu Knyphausen-Aufsess D (2014) On dominant logic: review and synthesis. J Bus Econ 84:27–70.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-013-0690-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frankenberger K, Weiblen T, Csik M, Gassmann O (2013) The 4I-framework of business model innovation: a structured view on process phases and challenges. Int J Prod Dev 18:249.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2013.055012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Friedland R (2002) Money, sex, and god: the erotic logic of religious nationalism. Sociol Theory 20:381–425.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Futterer F, Schmidt J, Heidenreich S (2017) Effectuation or causation as the key to corporate venture success? Investigating effects of entrepreneurial behaviors on business model innovation and venture performance. Long Range Plan.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Garud R, Hardy C, Maguire S (2007) Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: an introduction to the special issue. Org Stud 28:957–969.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078958 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gassmann O, Frankenberger K, Csik M (2014) The business model navigator: 55 models that will revolutionise your business. Pearson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Gawer A, Phillips N (2013) Institutional work as logics shift: the case of Intel’s transformation to platform leader. Org Stud 34:1035–1071.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613492071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gioia DA, Chittipeddi K (1991) Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strateg Manag J 12:433–448Google Scholar
  34. Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Org Res Methods 16:15–31.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gläser J, Laudel G (2010) Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen, 4. VS Verlag für Sozialwiss, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  36. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1970) Discovery of substantive theory: a basic strategy underlying qualitative research. Qualitative methodology. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 288–297Google Scholar
  37. Greenwood R, Suddaby R (2006) Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the big five accounting firms. Acad Manag J 49:27–48Google Scholar
  38. Gupta VK, Chiles TH, McMullen JS (2016) A process perspective on evaluating and conducting effectual entrepreneurship research. Acad Manag Rev 41:540–544Google Scholar
  39. Hacklin F, Björkdahl J, Wallin MW (2018) Strategies for business model innovation: how firms reel in migrating value. Long Range Plan 51:82–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hankammer S, Brenk S, Fabry H, Nordemann A, Piller FT (2019) Towards circular business models: identifying consumer needs based on the jobs-to-be-done theory. J Clean Prod 231:341–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Harms R, Schiele H (2012) Antecedents and consequences of effectuation and causation in the international new venture creation process. J Int Entrep 10:95–116.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-012-0089-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Heidenreich S, Kraemer T (2016) Innovations-doomed to fail? Investigating strategies to overcome passive innovation resistance. J Prod Innov Manag 33:277–297.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heidenreich S, Spieth P (2013) Why innovations fail—the case of passive and active innovation resistance. Int J Innov Manag 17:1350021.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919613500217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Heinze KL, Weber K (2015) Toward organizational pluralism: institutional intrapreneurship in integrative medicine. Organ Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hock M, Clauss T, Schulz E (2016) The impact of organizational culture on a firm’s capability to innovate the business model. R&D Manag 46:433–450.  https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holm P (1995) The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Admin Sci Q 40:398–422Google Scholar
  47. Howard-Grenville J, Golden-Biddle K, Irwin J, Mao J (2011) Liminality as cultural process for cultural change. Organ Sci 22:522–539Google Scholar
  48. Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manag Sci 52:1661–1674.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Johnson MW, Christensen CM, Kagermann H (2008) Reinventing Your Business Model. Harv Bus Rev 86:50–59Google Scholar
  50. Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad Manag J 56:137–159.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Khanagha S, Volberda Henk, Oshri Ilan (2014) Business model renewal and ambidexterity structural alteration and strategy formation process during transition to a Cloud business model. R&D Manag 44:322–340Google Scholar
  52. Kim WC, Mauborgne RA (2014) Blue ocean strategy, expanded edition: how to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Harvard Business Review Press, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  53. Kotter JP (2012) Leading change. Harvard Business Press, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  54. Laasch O (2018) Beyond the purely commercial business model: organizational value logics and the heterogeneity of sustainability business models. Long Range Plan 51:158–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad Manag Rev 24:691–710Google Scholar
  56. Langley A, Smallman C, Tsoukas H, van de Ven AH (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Acad Manag J 56:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.4001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Laudien SM, Daxböck B (2016) Path dependence as a barrier to business model change in manufacturing firms: insights from a multiple-case study. J Bus Econ 86:611–645.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0793-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lounsbury M (2002) Institutional transformation and status mobility: the professionalization of the field of finance. Acad Manag J 45:255–266Google Scholar
  59. Mair J, Battilana J, Cardenas J (2012) Organizing for society: a typology of social entrepreneuring models. J Bus Ethics 111:353–373.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1414-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Martins LL, Rindova VP, Greenbaum BE (2015) Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: a cognitive approach to business model innovation. Strateg Entrep J 9:99–117.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mason J (2017) Qualitative researching. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  62. Massa L, Tucci CL, Afuah A (2017) A critical assessment of business model research. Acad Manag Ann 11:73–104.  https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Micelotta E, Lounsbury M, Greenwood R (2017) Pathways of institutional change: an integrative review and research agenda. J Manag 43:1885–1910.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317699522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis an expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  65. Müller JM, Buliga O, Voigt K-I (2018) Fortune favors the prepared: how SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technol Forecast Soc Change.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Q 41:223–238.  https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ Sci 22:1286–1296.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ocasio W, Radoynovska N (2016) Strategy and commitments to institutional logics: organizational heterogeneity in business models and governance. Strateg Organ 14:287–309.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127015625040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Clark T (eds) (2010) Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  70. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Bernarda G, Smith A (eds) (2014) Value proposition design: how to create products and services customers want. Strategyzer series. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  71. Pache A-C, Santos F (2010) When worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad Manag Rev 35:455–476Google Scholar
  72. Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change theory and practice. Organ Sci 1:267–292Google Scholar
  73. Pratt MG, Rockmann KW, Kaufmann JB (2006) Constructing professional identity: the role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Acad Manag J 49:235–262Google Scholar
  74. Read S, Dew N, Sarasvathy SD, Song M, Wiltbank R (2009) Marketing under uncertainty: the logic of an effectual approach. J Mark 73:1–18Google Scholar
  75. Reimann M, Schilke O, Thomas JS (2010) Toward an understanding of industry commoditization: its nature and role in evolving marketing competition. Int J Res Mark 27:188–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Reymen IMMJ, Andries P, Berends H, Mauer R, Stephan U, van Burg E (2015) Understanding dynamics of strategic decision making in venture creation: a process study of effectuation and causation. Strateg Entrep J 9:351–379.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Reymen I, Berends H, Oudehand R, Stultiëns R (2017) Decision making for business model development: a process study of effectuation and causation in new technology-based ventures. R&D Manag 47:595–606.  https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Saebi T, Lien L, Foss NJ (2017) What drives business model adaptation? The impact of opportunities, threats and strategic orientation. Long Range Plan 50:567–581.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sarasvathy SD (2001) Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manag Rev 26:243–263Google Scholar
  80. Sarasvathy SD (2009) Effectuation: elements of entrepreneurial expertise, Paperback ed. New horizons in entrepreneurship, edn. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  81. Sarasvathy SD, Dew N (2008) Is effectuation Lachmannian? A response to Chiles, Bluedorn, and Gupta (2007). Organ Stud 29:239–245.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schallmo D, Williams CA, Boarman L (2017) Digital transformation of business models—best practice, enablers, and roadmap. Int J Innov Manag 21:1740014Google Scholar
  83. Schildt H, Perkmann M (2017) Organizational settlements. J Manag Inq 26:139–145.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616670756 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schneckenberg D, Velamuri VK, Comberg C, Spieth P (2017) Business model innovation and decision making: uncovering mechanisms for coping with uncertainty. R&D Manag 47:404–419Google Scholar
  85. Sharma P, Chrisman JJ, Chua JH (1997) Strategic management of the family business: past research and future challenges. Family Bus Rev 10:1–35Google Scholar
  86. Silverman BS, Baden FC, Mangematin V (eds) (2015) Business models and organizations. Advances in strategic management. Emerald Publishing, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  87. Spieth P, Schneider S (2016) Business model innovativeness: designing a formative measure for business model innovation. J Bus Econ 86:671–696.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0794-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Spieth P, Schneckenberg D, Ricart JE (2014) Business model innovation—state of the art and future challenges for the field. R&D Manag 44:237–247.  https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Spieth P, Schneckenberg D, Matzler K (2016) Exploring the linkage between business model (&) innovation and the strategy of the firm. R&D Manag 46:403–413.  https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Spieth P, Schneider S, Clauß T, Eichenberg D (2018) Value drivers of social businesses: a business model perspective. Long Range Plan.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Spradley JP (2016) The ethnographic interview. Waveland Press, Long GroveGoogle Scholar
  92. Stake RE (2000) Case studies. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 435–455Google Scholar
  93. Strauss AL (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  94. Takeda H, Veerkamp Paul, Yoshikawa H (1990) Modeling design process. AI Mag 11:37Google Scholar
  95. Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan 43:172–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Thornton PH (2002) The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Acad Manag J 45:81–101Google Scholar
  97. Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press on Demand, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  98. Townsend DM, Hart TA (2008) Perceived institutional ambiguity and the choice of organizational form in social entrepreneurial ventures. Entrep Theory Pract 32:685–700Google Scholar
  99. Töytäri P, Turunen T, Klein M, Eloranta V, Biehl S, Rajala R (2018) Aligning the mindset and capabilities within a business network for successful adoption of smart services. J Prod Innov Manag 35:763–779.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tracey P, Phillips N, Jarvis O (2011) Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: a multilevel model. Organ Sci 22:60–80Google Scholar
  101. Vaskelainen T, Münzel K (2018) The effect of institutional logics on business model development in the sharing economy: the case of German carsharing services. Acad Manag Discov 4:273–293.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2016.0149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Visnjic I, Wiengarten F, Neely A (2016) Only the brave: product innovation, service business model innovation, and their impact on performance. J Prod Innov Manag 33:36–52.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wei Z, Yang D, Sun B, Gu M (2014) The fit between technological innovation and business model design for firm growth: evidence from China. R&D Manag 44:288–305.  https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wirtz BW (2013) Business model management: design, Instrumente, Erfolgsfaktoren von Geschäftsmodellen, 3, aktuelle u. überarb. Aufl. Springer Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  105. Yin RK (2017) Case study research and applications: design and methods. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Brenk
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dirk Lüttgens
    • 1
  • Kathleen Diener
    • 1
  • Frank Piller
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Technology and Innovation ManagementRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations