Learning from failures in business model innovation: solving decision-making logic conflicts through intrapreneurial effectuation Original Paper First Online: 29 October 2019 Abstract
Established organizations need to adapt their current business models (BMs) to match dynamic changes in their environment. Alternatives to the established BM usually incorporate a different logic of how value is created, offered, and captured. When selecting and implementing the best BM alternative, organizations have to make decisions on several highly uncertain questions: What will the future look like, on what basis should we take action, how do we act under risks and limited resources, and how should we behave in light of unexpected events and towards outsiders. Firms can apply the logic of causation or that of effectuation when making these decisions. In this context, we apply a longitudinal single case study of a manufacturing company encountering a digital transformation journey. In this case study, we investigate the shift from a product-based to a smart service model and the underlying process of decision-making in the context of business model innovation (BMI). From our case study, we identify latent conflicts resulting from two different BM logics: the logic of value offering, creation, and capture of the dominant (established) BM versus that of the new one. We show that logic conflicts become especially visible when actors cannot reduce uncertainty about the new BM effectively. These conflicts finally inhibit the change of the dominant BM to the new one. Sensemaking in the company about the latent logic conflicts within the BMI process reveals the need to change its decision-making logic from managerial causation to intrapreneurial effectuation. The findings from our study contribute to entrepreneurship and institutional theory while highlighting the concept of institutional intrapreneurship for BMI. Our results suggest separating the alternative BM from the existing one. This separation can reduce cognitive uncertainty associated with BMI processes through logic pluralism, i.e., building a new decision-making logic in parallel to the old one. We contribute to the BMI literature by adding logic conflicts of BMI and the decision-making logic of an organization to the list of important contingency factors that influence the execution and outcome of a BMI process.
Keywords Business model innovation Digital transformation/Digitization Institutional theory Effectuation Causation Sensemaking Institutional entrepreneurship Institutional logic Family business Value migration Pivoting Longitudinal single case study Mixed-method Logic pluralism Notes Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the German Research Council (DFG) for their support within the Cluster "Internet of Production", Project ID 390 621 612.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Amaratunga D, Baldry D (2001) Case study methodology as a means of theory building: performance measurement in facilities management organisations. Work Study 50:95–105
Arend RJ, Sarooghi H, Burkemper A (2015) Effectuation As Ineffectual? Applying the 3E theory-assessment framework to a proposed new theory of entrepreneurship. Acad Manag Rev 40:630–651.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0455 CrossRef Google Scholar
Arnold C, Kiel D, Voigt K-I (2016) How the industrial internet of things changes business models in different manufacturing industries. Int J Innov Manag 20:1640015
Bammens Y, Voordeckers W, van Gils A (2011) Boards of directors in family businesses: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 13:134–152.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00289.x CrossRef Google Scholar
Battilana J (2006) Agency and institutions: the enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization 13:653–676
Battilana J, Leca B, Boxenbaum E (2009) 2 how actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Acad Manag Ann 3:65–107
Berends H, Jelinek M, Reymen I, Stultiëns R (2014) Product innovation processes in small firms: combining entrepreneurial effectuation and managerial causation. J Prod Innov Manag 31:616–635.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12117 CrossRef Google Scholar
Berends H, Smits A, Reymen I, Podoynitsyna K (2016) Learning while (re)configuring: business model innovation processes in established firms. Strateg Org 14:181–219.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016632758 CrossRef Google Scholar
Berglund H (2015) Between cognition and discourse: phenomenology and the study of entrepreneurship. Int J Entrep Behav Res 21:472–488.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2013-0210 CrossRef Google Scholar
Boyatzis RE (1998) Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Brady HE, Collier D (eds) (2010) Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards, 2nd edn. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham
Brettel M, Mauer R, Engelen A, Küpper D (2012) Corporate effectuation: entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. J Bus Ventur 27:167–184.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
Buliga O, Scheiner CW, Voigt K-I (2016) Business model innovation and organizational resilience: towards an integrated conceptual framework. J Bus Econ 86:647–670.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0796-y CrossRef Google Scholar
Casadesus-Masanell R, Ricart JE (2010) From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Plan 43:195–215.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.01.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
Casadesus-Masanell R, Zhu F (2013) Business model innovation and competitive imitation: the case of sponsor-based business models. Strateg Manag J 34:464–482.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2022 CrossRef Google Scholar
Clauss T (2017) Measuring business model innovation: conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Manag 47:385–403
Chandler GN, DeTienne DR, McKelvie A, Mumford TV (2011) Causation and effectuation processes: a validation study. J Bus Ventur 26:375–390.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006 CrossRef Google Scholar
Chesbrough H (2007) Business model innovation: it's not just about technology anymore. Strat Leadersh 35:12–17.
https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570710833714 CrossRef Google Scholar
Chesbrough H (2010) Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan 43:354–363.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010 CrossRef Google Scholar
Chiles TH, Gupta VK, Bluedorn AC (2008) On Lachmannian and effectual entrepreneurship: a rejoinder to Sarasvathy and Dew (2008). Org Stud 29:247–253.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088154 CrossRef Google Scholar
Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE (1999) An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Acad Manag Rev 24:522–537
Dew N, Read S, Sarasvathy SD, Wiltbank R (2009) Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: differences between experts and novices. J Bus Ventur 24:287–309.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002 CrossRef Google Scholar
Duriau VJ, Reger RK, Pfarrer MD (2007) A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Org Res Methods 10:5–34.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106289252 CrossRef Google Scholar
Fisher G (2012) Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: a behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrep Theory Pract 36:1019–1051.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x CrossRef Google Scholar
Foss NJ, Saebi T (2017) Fifteen years of research on business model innovation. J Manag 43:200–227.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927 CrossRef Google Scholar
Franke T, zu Knyphausen-Aufsess D (2014) On dominant logic: review and synthesis. J Bus Econ 84:27–70.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-013-0690-4 CrossRef Google Scholar
Frankenberger K, Weiblen T, Csik M, Gassmann O (2013) The 4I-framework of business model innovation: a structured view on process phases and challenges. Int J Prod Dev 18:249.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2013.055012 CrossRef Google Scholar
Friedland R (2002) Money, sex, and god: the erotic logic of religious nationalism. Sociol Theory 20:381–425.
https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00169 CrossRef Google Scholar
Futterer F, Schmidt J, Heidenreich S (2017) Effectuation or causation as the key to corporate venture success? Investigating effects of entrepreneurial behaviors on business model innovation and venture performance. Long Range Plan.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.008 CrossRef Google Scholar
Garud R, Hardy C, Maguire S (2007) Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: an introduction to the special issue. Org Stud 28:957–969.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078958 CrossRef Google Scholar
Gassmann O, Frankenberger K, Csik M (2014) The business model navigator: 55 models that will revolutionise your business. Pearson, London
Gawer A, Phillips N (2013) Institutional work as logics shift: the case of Intel’s transformation to platform leader. Org Stud 34:1035–1071.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613492071 CrossRef Google Scholar
Gioia DA, Chittipeddi K (1991) Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strateg Manag J 12:433–448
Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Org Res Methods 16:15–31.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151 CrossRef Google Scholar
Gläser J, Laudel G (2010) Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen, 4. VS Verlag für Sozialwiss, Wiesbaden
Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1970) Discovery of substantive theory: a basic strategy underlying qualitative research. Qualitative methodology. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 288–297
Greenwood R, Suddaby R (2006) Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the big five accounting firms. Acad Manag J 49:27–48
Gupta VK, Chiles TH, McMullen JS (2016) A process perspective on evaluating and conducting effectual entrepreneurship research. Acad Manag Rev 41:540–544
Hacklin F, Björkdahl J, Wallin MW (2018) Strategies for business model innovation: how firms reel in migrating value. Long Range Plan 51:82–110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.009 CrossRef Google Scholar
Hankammer S, Brenk S, Fabry H, Nordemann A, Piller FT (2019) Towards circular business models: identifying consumer needs based on the jobs-to-be-done theory. J Clean Prod 231:341–358.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.165 CrossRef Google Scholar
Harms R, Schiele H (2012) Antecedents and consequences of effectuation and causation in the international new venture creation process. J Int Entrep 10:95–116.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-012-0089-2 CrossRef Google Scholar
Heidenreich S, Kraemer T (2016) Innovations-doomed to fail? Investigating strategies to overcome passive innovation resistance. J Prod Innov Manag 33:277–297.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12273 CrossRef Google Scholar
Heidenreich S, Spieth P (2013) Why innovations fail—the case of passive and active innovation resistance. Int J Innov Manag 17:1350021.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919613500217 CrossRef Google Scholar
Heinze KL, Weber K (2015) Toward organizational pluralism: institutional intrapreneurship in integrative medicine. Organ Sci.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1028 CrossRef Google Scholar
Hock M, Clauss T, Schulz E (2016) The impact of organizational culture on a firm’s capability to innovate the business model. R&D Manag 46:433–450.
https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12153 CrossRef Google Scholar
Holm P (1995) The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Admin Sci Q 40:398–422
Howard-Grenville J, Golden-Biddle K, Irwin J, Mao J (2011) Liminality as cultural process for cultural change. Organ Sci 22:522–539
Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manag Sci 52:1661–1674.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576 CrossRef Google Scholar
Johnson MW, Christensen CM, Kagermann H (2008) Reinventing Your Business Model. Harv Bus Rev 86:50–59
Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad Manag J 56:137–159.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772 CrossRef Google Scholar
Khanagha S, Volberda Henk, Oshri Ilan (2014) Business model renewal and ambidexterity structural alteration and strategy formation process during transition to a Cloud business model. R&D Manag 44:322–340
Kim WC, Mauborgne RA (2014) Blue ocean strategy, expanded edition: how to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Harvard Business Review Press, Brighton
Kotter JP (2012) Leading change. Harvard Business Press, Brighton
Laasch O (2018) Beyond the purely commercial business model: organizational value logics and the heterogeneity of sustainability business models. Long Range Plan 51:158–183.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.09.002 CrossRef Google Scholar
Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad Manag Rev 24:691–710
Langley A, Smallman C, Tsoukas H, van de Ven AH (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Acad Manag J 56:1–13.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.4001 CrossRef Google Scholar
Laudien SM, Daxböck B (2016) Path dependence as a barrier to business model change in manufacturing firms: insights from a multiple-case study. J Bus Econ 86:611–645.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0793-1 CrossRef Google Scholar
Lounsbury M (2002) Institutional transformation and status mobility: the professionalization of the field of finance. Acad Manag J 45:255–266
Mair J, Battilana J, Cardenas J (2012) Organizing for society: a typology of social entrepreneuring models. J Bus Ethics 111:353–373.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1414-3 CrossRef Google Scholar
Martins LL, Rindova VP, Greenbaum BE (2015) Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: a cognitive approach to business model innovation. Strateg Entrep J 9:99–117.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1191 CrossRef Google Scholar
Mason J (2017) Qualitative researching. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Massa L, Tucci CL, Afuah A (2017) A critical assessment of business model research. Acad Manag Ann 11:73–104.
https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0072 CrossRef Google Scholar
Micelotta E, Lounsbury M, Greenwood R (2017) Pathways of institutional change: an integrative review and research agenda. J Manag 43:1885–1910.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317699522 CrossRef Google Scholar
Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis an expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Müller JM, Buliga O, Voigt K-I (2018) Fortune favors the prepared: how SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technol Forecast Soc Change.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.019 CrossRef Google Scholar
Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Q 41:223–238.
https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03 CrossRef Google Scholar
Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ Sci 22:1286–1296.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0602 CrossRef Google Scholar
Ocasio W, Radoynovska N (2016) Strategy and commitments to institutional logics: organizational heterogeneity in business models and governance. Strateg Organ 14:287–309.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127015625040 CrossRef Google Scholar
Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Clark T (eds) (2010) Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley, Hoboken
Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Bernarda G, Smith A (eds) (2014) Value proposition design: how to create products and services customers want. Strategyzer series. Wiley, Hoboken
Pache A-C, Santos F (2010) When worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad Manag Rev 35:455–476
Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change theory and practice. Organ Sci 1:267–292
Pratt MG, Rockmann KW, Kaufmann JB (2006) Constructing professional identity: the role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Acad Manag J 49:235–262
Read S, Dew N, Sarasvathy SD, Song M, Wiltbank R (2009) Marketing under uncertainty: the logic of an effectual approach. J Mark 73:1–18
Reimann M, Schilke O, Thomas JS (2010) Toward an understanding of industry commoditization: its nature and role in evolving marketing competition. Int J Res Mark 27:188–197.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.10.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
Reymen IMMJ, Andries P, Berends H, Mauer R, Stephan U, van Burg E (2015) Understanding dynamics of strategic decision making in venture creation: a process study of effectuation and causation. Strateg Entrep J 9:351–379.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1201 CrossRef Google Scholar
Reymen I, Berends H, Oudehand R, Stultiëns R (2017) Decision making for business model development: a process study of effectuation and causation in new technology-based ventures. R&D Manag 47:595–606.
https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12249 CrossRef Google Scholar
Saebi T, Lien L, Foss NJ (2017) What drives business model adaptation? The impact of opportunities, threats and strategic orientation. Long Range Plan 50:567–581.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.06.006 CrossRef Google Scholar
Sarasvathy SD (2001) Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manag Rev 26:243–263
Sarasvathy SD (2009) Effectuation: elements of entrepreneurial expertise, Paperback ed. New horizons in entrepreneurship, edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Sarasvathy SD, Dew N (2008) Is effectuation Lachmannian? A response to Chiles, Bluedorn, and Gupta (2007). Organ Stud 29:239–245.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088153 CrossRef Google Scholar
Schallmo D, Williams CA, Boarman L (2017) Digital transformation of business models—best practice, enablers, and roadmap. Int J Innov Manag 21:1740014
Schildt H, Perkmann M (2017) Organizational settlements. J Manag Inq 26:139–145.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616670756 CrossRef Google Scholar
Schneckenberg D, Velamuri VK, Comberg C, Spieth P (2017) Business model innovation and decision making: uncovering mechanisms for coping with uncertainty. R&D Manag 47:404–419
Sharma P, Chrisman JJ, Chua JH (1997) Strategic management of the family business: past research and future challenges. Family Bus Rev 10:1–35
Silverman BS, Baden FC, Mangematin V (eds) (2015) Business models and organizations. Advances in strategic management. Emerald Publishing, Brighton
Spieth P, Schneider S (2016) Business model innovativeness: designing a formative measure for business model innovation. J Bus Econ 86:671–696.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0794-0 CrossRef Google Scholar
Spieth P, Schneckenberg D, Ricart JE (2014) Business model innovation—state of the art and future challenges for the field. R&D Manag 44:237–247.
https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12071 CrossRef Google Scholar
Spieth P, Schneckenberg D, Matzler K (2016) Exploring the linkage between business model (&) innovation and the strategy of the firm. R&D Manag 46:403–413.
https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12218 CrossRef Google Scholar
Spieth P, Schneider S, Clauß T, Eichenberg D (2018) Value drivers of social businesses: a business model perspective. Long Range Plan.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.04.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
Spradley JP (2016) The ethnographic interview. Waveland Press, Long Grove
Stake RE (2000) Case studies. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 435–455
Strauss AL (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Takeda H, Veerkamp Paul, Yoshikawa H (1990) Modeling design process. AI Mag 11:37
Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan 43:172–194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003 CrossRef Google Scholar
Thornton PH (2002) The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Acad Manag J 45:81–101
Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press on Demand, Oxford
Townsend DM, Hart TA (2008) Perceived institutional ambiguity and the choice of organizational form in social entrepreneurial ventures. Entrep Theory Pract 32:685–700
Töytäri P, Turunen T, Klein M, Eloranta V, Biehl S, Rajala R (2018) Aligning the mindset and capabilities within a business network for successful adoption of smart services. J Prod Innov Manag 35:763–779.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12462 CrossRef Google Scholar
Tracey P, Phillips N, Jarvis O (2011) Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: a multilevel model. Organ Sci 22:60–80
Vaskelainen T, Münzel K (2018) The effect of institutional logics on business model development in the sharing economy: the case of German carsharing services. Acad Manag Discov 4:273–293.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2016.0149 CrossRef Google Scholar
Visnjic I, Wiengarten F, Neely A (2016) Only the brave: product innovation, service business model innovation, and their impact on performance. J Prod Innov Manag 33:36–52.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12254 CrossRef Google Scholar
Wei Z, Yang D, Sun B, Gu M (2014) The fit between technological innovation and business model design for firm growth: evidence from China. R&D Manag 44:288–305.
https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12069 CrossRef Google Scholar
Wirtz BW (2013) Business model management: design, Instrumente, Erfolgsfaktoren von Geschäftsmodellen, 3, aktuelle u. überarb. Aufl. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Yin RK (2017) Case study research and applications: design and methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Google Scholar Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019