Advertisement

Journal of Business Economics

, Volume 89, Issue 7, pp 893–926 | Cite as

Impacts of stakeholder influences and dynamic capabilities on the sustainability performance of supply chains: a system dynamics model

  • Tobias RebsEmail author
  • Daniel Thiel
  • Marcus Brandenburg
  • Stefan Seuring
Original Paper
  • 168 Downloads

Abstract

Dynamic capabilities (DCs) are crucial for companies to attain competitive advantage in dynamic business environments and supply chains, where environmental and social aspects are considered by sustainable supply chain management (SSCM). However, the effects of stakeholder influences on SSCM performance, which results from the interplay of DCs and SSCM practices, need to be analyzed. Therefore, a system dynamics (SD) model is proposed to include the influences of governmental, shareholder, and other external stakeholder pressure. The system behavior, i.e., the company’s SSCM performance, can thus be analyzed in face of varying time delays of stakeholder influences. Findings indicate that different intensities of stakeholder influences affect the development of SSCM practices and DCs of a focal company, and thus, overall SSCM performance. Consequently, intensities of stakeholder influences should be managed accordingly, while the impact of time delays has to be understood to control SSCM performance. The insights gained from the model support the decision- and policy-making, which can be considered from the perspective of the focal company, the regulatory authorities, the shareholders, and other external stakeholders that ultimately translate into customer pressure.

Keywords

Sustainable supply chain management Stakeholder influences Dynamic capabilities Practices System dynamics model 

JEL Classification

C63 L20 M19 

Notes

References

  1. Adamides ED, Voutsina M (2006) The double-helix model of manufacturing and marketing strategies. Int J Prod Econ 104:3–18Google Scholar
  2. Baines TS, Harrison DK (1999) An opportunity for system dynamics in manufacturing system modelling. Prod Plan Control 10(6):542–552Google Scholar
  3. Barlas Y (1996) Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 12:183–210Google Scholar
  4. Beske P (2012) Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 42(4):372–387Google Scholar
  5. Beske P (2013) Dynamic capabilities in sustainable supply chain management. Kassel University Press, KasselGoogle Scholar
  6. Beske P, Land A, Seuring S (2014) Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: a critical analysis of the literature. Int J Prod Econ 152:131–143Google Scholar
  7. Bitzer V, Francken M, Glasbergen P (2008) Intersectoral partnerships for a sustainable coffee chain: really addressing sustainability or just picking (coffee) cherries? Glob Environ Change 18(2):271–284Google Scholar
  8. Brandenburg M, Govindan K, Sarkis J, Seuring S (2014) Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: developments and directions. Eur J Oper Res 233:299–312Google Scholar
  9. Brandenburg M, Thiel D, Seuring S (2015) Modeling dynamic capabilities and policies for the sustainable management of food supply chains. In: 2nd international EurOMA sustainable operations and SC forum, Barcelona, Spain, paper ID: 13Google Scholar
  10. Chen L, Fong PSW (2013) Visualizing evolution of knowledge management capability in construction firms. J Constr Eng Manag 139(7):839–851Google Scholar
  11. Chen L, Fong PSW (2015) Evaluation of knowledge management performance: an organic approach. Inf Manag 52:431–453Google Scholar
  12. Chirico F, Nordqvist M, Colombo G, Mollona E (2012) Simulating dynamic capabilities and value creation in family firms: is paternalism an ‘asset’ or a ‘liability’? Fam Bus Rev 25(3):318–338Google Scholar
  13. Chkanikova O, Mont O (2015) Corporate supply chain responsibility: drivers and barriers for sustainable food retailing. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 22(2):65–82Google Scholar
  14. Chowdhury MMH, Agarwal R, Quaddus M (2019) Dynamic capabilities for meeting stakeholders’ sustainability requirements in supply chains. J Clean Prod 215:34–45Google Scholar
  15. Ciliberti F, Pontrandolfo P, Scozzi B (2008) Logistics social responsibility: standard adoption and practices in Italian companies. Int J Prod Econ 113:88–106Google Scholar
  16. Cubas-Díaz M, Martinez Sedano MA (2018) Measures for sustainable investment decisions and business strategy—a triple bottom line approach. Bus Strategy Environ 27:16–38Google Scholar
  17. Doluschitz R, Engler B, Hoffmann C (2010) Quality assurance and traceability of foods of animal origin: major findings from the research project IT FoodTrace. J Consum Prot Food Saf 5:11–19Google Scholar
  18. Garcia-Sanchez I-M, Cuadrado-Ballesteros B, Sepulveda C (2014) Does media pressure moderate CSR disclosures by external directors? Manag Decis 52:1014–1045Google Scholar
  19. Garcia-Torea N, Fernandez-Feijoo B, de la Cuesta M (2016) Board of director’s effectiveness and the stakeholder perspective of corporate governance: do effective boards promote the interests of shareholders and stakeholders? Bus Res Q 19:246–260Google Scholar
  20. Graf NFS, Rothlauf F (2012) Firm-NGO collaborations: a resource-based perspective. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 82:103–125Google Scholar
  21. Größler A (2007) A dynamic view on strategic resources and capabilities applied to an example from the manufacturing strategy literature. J Manuf Technol Manag 18:250–266Google Scholar
  22. Größler A (2010) An exploratory system dynamics model of strategic capabilities in manufacturing. J Manuf Technol Manag 21(6):651–669Google Scholar
  23. Größler A, Thun J-H, Milling PM (2008) System dynamics as a structural theory in operations management. Prod Oper Manag 17:373–384Google Scholar
  24. Gualandris J, Kalchschmidt M (2014) Customer pressure and innovativeness: their role in sustainable supply chain management. J Purch Supply Manag 20:92–103Google Scholar
  25. Gualandris J, Klassen RD, Vachon S, Kalchschmidt M (2015) Sustainable evaluation and verification in supply chains: aligning and leveraging accountability to stakeholders. J Oper Manag 38:1–13Google Scholar
  26. Guoyou Q, Saixing Z, Chiming T, Haitao Y, Hailiang Z (2013) Stakeholders’ influences on corporate green innovation strategy: a case study of manufacturing firms in China. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 20:1–14Google Scholar
  27. Henningsson S, Hyde K, Smith A, Campbell M (2004) The value of resource efficiency in the food industry: a waste minimisation project in East Anglia, UK. J Clean Prod 12(5):505–512Google Scholar
  28. Klassen RD, Vereecke A (2012) Social issues in supply chains: capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance. Int J Prod Econ 140:103–115Google Scholar
  29. Kumar G, Subramanian N, Arputham RM (2018) Missing link between sustainability collaborative strategy and supply chain performance: role of dynamic capability. Int J Prod Econ 203:96–109Google Scholar
  30. Land A (2016) Sustainable supply chain management and dynamic capabilities: a review and case studies. Kassel University Press, KasselGoogle Scholar
  31. Liboni LB, Jabbour CJC, Jabbour A, Devika K (2017) Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: a systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition. J Clean Prod 142(1):308–322Google Scholar
  32. Liu X, Yang J, Qu S, Wang L, Shishime T, Bao C (2012) Sustainable production: practices and determinant factors of green supply chain management of chinese companies. Bus Strategy Environ 21:1–16Google Scholar
  33. Maas S, Schuster T, Hartmann E (2018) Stakeholder pressures, environmental practice adoption and economic performance in the German third-party logistics industry—a contingency perspective. J Bus Econ 88:167–201Google Scholar
  34. Meade L, Sarkis J (1998) Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytical network process. Transp Res Part E 34(3):201–215Google Scholar
  35. Meixell MJ, Luoma P (2015) Stakeholder pressure in sustainable supply chain management. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 45:69–89Google Scholar
  36. Pagell M, Wu Z (2009) Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. J Supply Chain Manag 45(2):37–56Google Scholar
  37. Patel VK, Manley SC, Hair JF Jr, Ferrell OC, Pieper TM (2016) Is stakeholder orientation relevant for European firms? Eur Manag J 34:650–660Google Scholar
  38. Rebs T, Brandenburg M, Seuring S (2019) System dynamics modeling for sustainable supply chain management: a literature review and systems thinking approach. J Clean Prod 208:1265–1280Google Scholar
  39. Reefke H, Sundaram D (2017) Key themes and research opportunities in sustainable supply chain management—identification and evaluation. Omega 66:195–211Google Scholar
  40. Romme AGL, Zollo M, Berends P (2010) Dynamic capabilities, deliberate learning and environmental dynamism: a simulation model. Ind Corp Change 19(4):1271–1299Google Scholar
  41. Sarkis J, Gonzalez-Torre P, Adenso-Diaz B (2010) Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: the mediating effect of training. J Oper Manag 28:163–176Google Scholar
  42. Sarkis J, Zhu Q, Lai K-H (2011) An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int J Prod Econ 130:1–15Google Scholar
  43. Schiefer G (2002) Environmental control for process improvement and process efficiency in supply chain management—and the case of the meat chain. Int J Prod Econ 78:197–206Google Scholar
  44. Seuring S, Müller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 16:1699–1710Google Scholar
  45. Smit AAH, Driessen PPJ, Glasbergen P (2008) Constraints on the conversion to sustainable production: the case of the Dutch potato chain. Bus Strategy Environ 17(6):369–381Google Scholar
  46. Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics. McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  47. Tako AA, Robinson S (2012) The application of discrete event simulation and system dynamics in the logistics and supply chain context. Decis Support Syst 52:802–815Google Scholar
  48. Tate WL, Ellram LM, Kirchoff JF (2010) Corporate social responsibility reports: a thematic analysis related to supply chain management. J Supply Chain Manag 46(1):19–44Google Scholar
  49. Teece DJ (2007) Explication dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J 28:1319–1350Google Scholar
  50. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533Google Scholar
  51. Thiel D, Seuring S, Brandenburg M (2014) Modeling dynamic capabilities and policies for the sustainable management of food supply chains—a system dynamics approach. In: 1st international EurOMA sustainable operations and SC forum, 23–25 March 2014, Groningen, The Netherlands, paper ID: 124Google Scholar
  52. Van Wassenhove LN, Besiou M (2013) Complex problems with multiple stakeholders: how to bridge the gap between reality and OR/MS? J Bus Econ 83:87–97Google Scholar
  53. Vermeulen WJ (2010) Sustainable supply chain governance systems: conditions for effective market based governance in global trade. Prog Ind Ecol Int J 7(2):138–162Google Scholar
  54. Walls J, Berrone P (2017) The power of one to make a difference: how informal and formal CEO power affect environmental sustainability. J Bus Ethics 145:293–308Google Scholar
  55. Wiskerke JSC, Roep D (2007) Constructing a sustainable pork supply chain: a case of techno-institutional innovation. J Environ Plan Policy Manag 9(1):53–74Google Scholar
  56. Wognum PM, Bremmers H, Trienekens JH, van der Vorst JGAJ, Bloemhof J (2011) Systems for sustainability and transparency of food supply chains—current status and challenges. Adv Eng Inform 25:65–76Google Scholar
  57. Wolf J (2014) The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. J Bus Ethics 119:317–328Google Scholar
  58. Yasarcan H, Barlas Y (2005) A generalized stock control formulation for stock management problems involving composite delays and secondary stocks. Syst Dyn Rev 21:33–68Google Scholar
  59. Yasarvan H (2011) Stock management in the presence of significant measurement delays. Syst Dyn Rev 27:91–109Google Scholar
  60. Zhu Q, Geng Y, Sarkis J (2016) Shifting Chinese organizational responses to evolving greening pressures. Ecol Econ 121:65–74Google Scholar
  61. Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci 13(3):339–351Google Scholar
  62. Zollo M, Bettinazzi ELM, Neumann K, Snoeren P (2016) Toward a comprehensive model of organizational evolution: dynamic capabilities for innovation and adaptation of the enterprise model. Glob Strategy J 6:225–244Google Scholar
  63. Zvezdov D, Akhavan RM (2018) Interactions along the supply chain for building dynamic capabilities for sustainable supply chain management. In: Brandenburg M, Hahn GJ, Rebs T (eds) Social and environmental dimensions of organizations and supply chains: tradeoffs and synergies. Series: greening of industry network studies. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KasselKasselGermany
  2. 2.UFR Sciences Economiques Et Gestion, Université 13 Paris, Sorbonne Paris CitéParisFrance
  3. 3.School of BusinessFlensburg University of Applied SciencesFlensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations