Advertisement

Energy considerations for the economic production quantity and the joint economic lot sizing

  • Lucio Enrico ZavanellaEmail author
  • Beatrice Marchi
  • Simone Zanoni
  • Ivan Ferretti
Original Paper
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The increased awareness on sustainability, along with several governments’ actions for setting greenhouse gas restrictions, has recently generated a relevant pressure on industries towards the improvement of environmental performances. Among the several aspects, companies’ focus is mainly on energy use, firstly for its relevant and direct impact on the total cost, and secondly for its environmental linkage. The aim of this contribution is the integration of the energy-related objectives in lot sizing, extending the economic production quantity from the manufacturer point of view and extending the joint economic lot size model from the single-vendor single-buyer supply chain perspective, so as to show how this approach can lead to a more sustainable production process. The present work proposes a novel framework for dimensioning production lot sizes, based on both economic and energy implications in processes characterized by a variable production rate. Furthermore, an increased attention for the sustainability of the production–inventory system is introduced by considering energy as a key factor in the lot sizing problem, due to the close link between energy and environmental concerns. A traditional agreement and a vendor managed inventory with consignment stock for the joint economic lot sizing have been investigated explicitly formulating energy in production aspects. A numerical example is also presented to compare the behaviour of the models.

Keywords

Energy Lot sizing Sustainability Production–inventory system 

JEL Classification

C61 Q49 

Notes

References

  1. Affisco JF, Paknejad MJ, Nasri F (2002) Quality improvement and setup reduction in the joint economic lot size model. Eur J Oper Res 142:497–508.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afshar-Nadjafi B (2013) An EPQ model with unit production cost and set-up cost as functions of production rate. Model Simul Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/727685 Google Scholar
  3. Banerjee A (1986) A joint economic-lot-size model for purchaser and vendor. Decis Sci 17:292–311.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1986.tb00228.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bazan E, Jaber MY, Zanoni S (2015) Supply chain models with greenhouse gases emissions, energy usage and different coordination decisions. Appl Math Model 39:5131–5151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.03.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazan E, Jaber MY, Zanoni S (2017) Carbon emissions and energy effects on a two-level manufacturer–retailer closed-loop supply chain model with remanufacturing subject to different coordination mechanisms. Int J Prod Econ 183:394–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biel K, Glock CH (2016a) Systematic literature review of decision support models for energy-efficient production planning. Comput Ind Eng 101:243–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biel K, Glock CH (2016b) On the use of waste heat in a two-stage production system with controllable production rates. Int J Prod Econ 181:174–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braglia M, Zavanella L (2003) Modelling an industrial strategy for inventory management in supply chains: the “Consignment Stock” case. Int J Prod Res 41:3793–3808.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802275863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bunse K, Vodicka M, Schönsleben P et al (2011) Integrating energy efficiency performance in production management—gap analysis between industrial needs and scientific literature. J Clean Prod 19:667–679.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang SKJ, Chuang JPC, Chen H-J (2005) Short comments on technical note—the EOQ and EPQ models with shortages derived without derivatives. Int J Prod Econ 97:241–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glock CH (2010) Batch sizing with controllable production rates. Int J Prod Res 48:5925–5942.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903170906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glock CH (2011) Batch sizing with controllable production rates in a multi-stage production system. Int J Prod Econ 49:37–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2010.528058 Google Scholar
  13. Glock CH (2012) The joint economic lot size problem: a review. Int J Prod Econ 135:671–686.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.10.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glock CH, Grosse EH, Ries JM (2014) The lot sizing problem: a tertiary study. Int J Prod Econ 155:39–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goyal SK (1977) An integrated inventory model for a single supplier-single customer problem. Int J Prod Res 15:107–111.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207547708943107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grubbström RW (1996) Material requirements planning and manufacturing resource planning. In: Warner M (ed) International encyclopedia of business and management. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Grubbström RW, Erdem A (1999) The EOQ with backlogging derived without derivatives. Int J Prod Econ 59:529–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gutowski T, Dahmus J, Thiriez A (2006) Electrical energy requirements for manufacturing processes. Energy 2:623–628Google Scholar
  19. Harris FW (1913) How many parts to make once. Fact Mag Manag 10:135–136Google Scholar
  20. Hill RM (1997) The single-vendor single-buyer integrated production–inventory model with a generalised policy. Eur J Oper Res 97:493–499.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(96)00267-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaber MY, Glock CH, El Saadany AMA (2013) Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives. Int J Prod Res 51:69–82.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.651656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khouja M (1997) The scheduling of economic lot sizes on volume flexible production systems. Int J Prod Econ 48:73–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-5273(96)00064-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khouja M, Mehrez A (1994) Economic production lot size model with variable production rate and imperfect quality. J Oper Res Soc 45:1405–1417.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2583934 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marchi B, Zanoni S (2017) Supply chain management for improved energy efficiency: review and opportunities. Energies 10:1618.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101618 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marchi B, Ries JM, Zanoni S, Glock CH (2016) A joint economic lot size model with financial collaboration and uncertain investment opportunity. Int J Prod Econ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.021 Google Scholar
  26. Marchi B, Zanoni S, Ferretti I, Zavanella LE (2018a) Stimulating investments in energy efficiency through supply chain integration. Energies 11:858.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040858 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marchi B, Zanoni S, Pasetti M (2018b) A supply chain model with integrated thermal recovery and electricity generation from industrial waste heat. In: ECEEE industrial summer study on industrial efficiency: leading the low-carbon transition, Kalkscheune, Berlin, Germany, 11–13 June 2018Google Scholar
  28. Marchi B, Zanoni S, Zavanella LE, Jaber MY (2018c) Green supply chain with learning in production and environmental investments. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51:1738–1743.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marchi B, Zanoni S, Jaber MY (2019a) Economic production quantity model with learning in production, quality, reliability and energy efficiency. Comput Ind Eng 129:502–511.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marchi B, Zanoni S, Zavanella LE, Jaber MY (2019b) Supply chain models with greenhouse gases emissions, energy usage, imperfect process under different coordination decisions. Int J Prod Econ 211:145–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pan JC-H, Yang J-S (2002) A study of an integrated inventory with controllable lead time. Int J Prod Res 40:1263–1273.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2010.501349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Porteus EL (1985) Investing in reduced setups in the EOQ model. Manag Sci Manag Sci 31:998–1010.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.8.998 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roehrich JK, Grosvold J, Hoejmose SU (2014) Reputational risks and sustainable supply chain management. Int J Oper Prod Manag 34:695–719.  https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-10-2012-0449 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Traft EW (1918) The most economical production lot. Iron Age 101:1410–1412Google Scholar
  35. Zanoni S, Grubbstrom RW (2004) A note on an industrial strategy for stock management in supply chains: modelling and performance evaluation. Int J Prod Res 42:4421–4426.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754042000264581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zanoni S, Bettoni L, Glock CH (2014) Energy implications in a two-stage production system with controllable production rates. Int J Prod Econ 149:164–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.06.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universita degli Studi di BresciaBresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations