Advertisement

NanoEthics

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 119–130 | Cite as

Reviewing the Concept of Technological Singularities: How Can It Explain Human Evolution?

  • De Leon Petta Gomes da CostaEmail author
Original Research Paper
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

The concept of “technological singularity”, while controversial, is typically applied to predict the next explosion of intelligence related to advances in computers and artificial intelligence. A potential “rise of machines” has been explored at length by Ray Kurzweil, Vernor Vinge, and many other scholars and futuristic enthusiasts. This study focuses on the fundamentals of the concept of technological singularity to understand the technological evolution of humankind based on the four main characteristics that constitute this concept. When this method is applied to a historical view, it is possible to isolate four technologies worthy of being called “singularities”. In fact, these technologies have formed the basis of human evolution by drastically changing our interaction with the environment, changing how we understand our place in the universe, changing our social behaviour and organizational structure, boosting human intelligence and explaining demographic explosions.

Keywords

Technological singularities Civilization Human evolution Artificial intelligence Anthropology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation; Grant Number: 2013/20955-5).

References

  1. 1.
    Vinge V (1993) Vernor Vinge on the singularity. San Diego State University, San Diego. Available at: http://mindstalk.net/vinge/vinge-sing.html. Accessed May 2019
  2. 2.
    Sandberg A (2013) An overview of models of technological singularity. The transhumanist reader. Wiley-Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Armstrong S (2017) Introduction to the technological singularity. In: Callaghan V (ed) The technological singularity: managing the journey. Springer, Berlin.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54033-6
  4. 4.
    Moon P (2007) AI will surpass human intelligence after 2020? Artificial Intelligence a likely future, professor says. Available at: https://www.computerworld.com.au/article/184070/ai_will_surpass_human_intelligence_after_2020/. Accessed May 2019
  5. 5.
    Ulam S (1958) Tribute to John von Neumann. Bull Am Math Soc 64(3), part 2:1–49Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chatfield T (2013) Netymology: from apps to zombies: a linguistic celebration of the digital world. Quercus Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Good IJ (1965) Speculations concerning the first ultraintelligent machine. In: Alt FL, Rubinoff M (eds) Advances in computers, vol 6. Academic Press, New York, pp 31–88Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurzweil R (2005) The singularity is near. When humans transcend biology. Penguin Books Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurzweil R (2001) The law of accelerating returns. Available at: http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns. Accessed May 2019
  10. 10.
    Leitner K-H (2017) The future of innovation: hyper innovation, slow innovation, and no innovation. BHM Berg Hüttenmänn Monatsh 162:386.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-017-0635-2
  11. 11.
    Cowen T (2011) The great stagnation: how America ate all the low-hanging fruit of modern history, got sick, and will (eventually) feel better. Penguin Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Potapov A (2018) Technological singularity: what do we really know? Information 9(4):82Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Allen PG, Greaves M (2011) The singularity isn't near. MIT Technol Rev. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/425733/paul-allen-the-singularity-isnt-near/. Accessed May 2019
  14. 14.
    Desai BC (2015) Technological singularities. In: IDEAS '15 Proceedings of the 19th International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2790755.2790769
  15. 15.
    Magee CL, Devezas TC (2011) How many singularities are near and how will they disrupt human history? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78(8).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.013
  16. 16.
    Hanson R (2008) Economics of the singularity. The singularity special report. IEEE Spectrum. Available at https://spectrum.ieee.org/robotics/robotics-software/economics-of-the-singularity. Accessed May 2019
  17. 17.
    James SR (1989) Hominid use of fire in the Lower and Middle Pleistocene: a review of the evidence. Curr Anthropol 30(1):1–26Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roebroeks W, Villa P (2011) On the earliest evidence for habitual use of fire in Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(13):5209–5214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trigger BG (1998) Writing systems: a case study in cultural evolution. Norwegian Archaeol Rev 31(1):39–62Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    David-Barrett T, Dunbar RIM (2016) Bipedality and hair-loss revisited: the impact of altitude and activity scheduling. J Hum Evol 94:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wrangham R (2009) Catching fire: how cooking made us human. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gibbons A (15 June 2007) Food for thought. Science 316(5831):1558–1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wrangham R (2013) The evolution of human nutrition. Curr Biol 233(9).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.061
  24. 24.
    Gowlett JAJ (2016) The discovery of fire by humans: a long and convoluted process. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 71(1696):20150164.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0164
  25. 25.
    Tylecote RF (2002) A history of metallurgy. Maney for the Institute of Materials, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Paterniani E (2001) Das Plantas Silvestres às Transgênicas. Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologias 18(1):169–179Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sinclair TR, Sinclair CJ (2010) Bread, beer and the seeds of change: agriculture’s imprint on world history. CABI, OxfordshireCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Curnoe D (2014) How farming changed us. Paleoanthropologist-Archaeologist. Available at: https://curnoe.com/2014/11/26/how-farming-changed-us/ Accessed May 2019
  29. 29.
    Wilde S, Timpson A, Kirsanow K, Kaiser E, Kayser M, Unterländer M, Hollfelder N, Potekhina ID, Schier W, Thomas MG, Burger J (2014) Direct evidence for positive selection of skin, hair, and eye pigmentation in Europeans during the last 5,000 y. PNAS 111(13):4832–4837.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1316513111
  30. 30.
    Rosenswig RM (2006) Sedentism and food production in early complex societies of the Soconusco, Mexico. World Archaeol 38(2):330–355.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240600694115(10)
  31. 31.
    Diamond J (1997) Guns, germs and steel. The fates of human societies. Ed. Record. Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kelly RL (1991) The origins of agriculture and its consequences. Rev Anthropol 17(1–4):253-263 Published online: 05 Jul 2010. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00988157.1991.9977926. Accessed May 2019
  33. 33.
    Fischer SR (2001) A history of writing. Reaktion Books—Globalities, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nissen HJ (1985) The emergence of writing in the ancient Near East. Interdiscip Sci Rev 10(4):349–361Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lerner F (1999) The story of libraries, from the invention of writing to the computer age. Continuum Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schott RL (2000) The origins of bureaucracy: an anthropological perspective. Inte J Public Adm 23(1):53–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hodgkin L (2005) A history of mathematics, from Mesopotamia to modernity. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Viollet P-L (2007) Water engineering in ancient civilizations, 5.000 years of history. IAHR International Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Research, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hobsbawm EJ (1996) The age of revolution: Europe, 1789–1848. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hobsbawm EJ (1995) The age of capital, 1848–1875. Abacus, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Voth H-J (2004) Living standards and the urban environment. In: Floud R, Johnson P (ed). The Cambridge economic history of modern Britain. Volume 1: industrialisation, 1700–1860. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Baines DE, Woods R (2004) Population and regional development. In: Floud R, Johnson P (eds) The Cambridge economic history of modern Britain, Volume II: economic maturity, 1860-1939. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–55Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Eror A (2013) China is engineering genius babies. In: Interview to Aleks Eror—Vice. Available at: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/5gw8vn/chinas-taking-over-the-world-with-a-massive-genetic-engineering-program Accessed May 2019
  44. 44.
    Hassoun N (2008) Nanotechnology, enhancement, and human nature. Nanoethics 2(3):289–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    de Looze MP, Bosch T, Krause F, Stadler KS, O’Sullivan LW (2016) Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics 59(5):671–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Biraben J-N (2003) The rising numbers of humankind. Population and Societies 394:1–4Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chiarelli B, Lucchesini A (1992) An outline of the world human population history. Glob Bioeth 5(1):63–67Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kurzweil R (2009) The coming merging of mind and machine. Scientific American, a Division of Springer Nature America, Inc. Available at https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/merging-of-mind-and-machine/. Accessed May 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International RelationsRio Branco CollegeSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Political Geography LaboratoryUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations