Advertisement

International organizations in a new era of populist nationalism

  • Mark CopelovitchEmail author
  • Jon C. W. Pevehouse
Introduction

Abstract

This article introduces the special issue on International Organizations in a New Era of Populist Nationalism. The special issue aims to clarify the stakes for and the politics of international organizations in a time of rising populist nationalism around the world. In this introductory essay, we attempt to disentangle the rise of populism and a resurgence of nationalism as distinct processes and concepts. While neither force is new, we observe significant variation across countries in the type of level of nationalist and populist objections to international institutions. We develop a typology for thinking about how and when populism, nationalism, or their combination might have different effects on international cooperation and organizations. Finally, we review the specific article contributions to the special issue and how they fit with the themes developed in this essay. The final section concludes with questions and ideas for future research on the topic that will enhance our understanding of the complex challenges – and potential opportunities – for international cooperation and organizations in the years ahead.

Keywords

Globalization International relations International economic order and integration International organizations Political economy 

JEL Classification

F02 F13 F5 F53 

Notes

References

  1. Brewer, M. B. (2001). The many faces of social identity: Implications for political psychology. Political Psychology, 22(1), 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, D. (2000). Contemporary Nationalism: Civic, Ethnocultural, and multicultural politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Collier, R. B. (2001). Populism. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 11813–11816). London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooper, R. (1971). “Tariff issues and the Third World”. The World Today. Chatham House publication, September.Google Scholar
  5. Cox, R. W. (1979). Ideologies and the new international economic order: Reflections on some recent literature. International Organization, 33(2), 257–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Cleen, B. (2017). Populism and nationalism. In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), Handbook on populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. De Vries, C. E. (2018). Euroskepticism and the future of European integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Vries, C. E., & Hobolt, S. B. (2012). When dimensions collide: The electoral success of issue entrepreneurs. European Union Politics, 13(2), 246–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fukuyama, F. (2018). The rise of populist nationalism. Credit Suisse Research Institute 2018 Davos Edition.Google Scholar
  10. Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Greenfeld, L. (1992). Nationalism: Five roads to modernity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Haas, E. B. (1958). The uniting of Europe: The political, social, and economic forces 1950–1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M. J. (2006). Learning to love globalization: Education and individual attitudes toward international trade. International Organization, 60(2), 469–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hobolt, S. B., & Tilley, J. (2014). Blaming Europe? Responsibility without accountability in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoffmann, S. (1966). Obstinate or obsolete: The fate of the nation-state and the case of western Europe. Daedalus, 95(3), 862–915.Google Scholar
  16. Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  17. Hymans, J. E. C. (2001). Of gauchos and gringos: Why Argentina never wanted the bomb, and why the United States thought it did. Security Studies, 10(3), 153–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hymans, J. E. C. (2006). The Pyschology of nuclear proliferation: Identity, emotions, and foreign policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ionescu, G., & Gellner, E. (Eds.). (1969). Populism: Its meaning and national characteristics. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, R. H. (1983). The new populism and the old: Demands for a new international economic order and American agrarian protest. International Organization, 37(1), 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kindleberger, C. P. (1975). World populism. Atlantic Economic Journal, 3(2), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London & New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  23. Mills, K., & Bloomfield, A. (2018). African resistance to the International Criminal Court: Halting the advance of the anti-impunity norm. Review of International Studies, 44(1), 101–127Google Scholar
  24. Milner, H. V. (1997). Interests, institutions, and information: Domestic politics and international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mitrany, D. (1943). A working peace system. An argument for the functional development of international organization. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  26. Moravcsik, A. (2000). The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54(2), 217–252.Google Scholar
  27. Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government & Opposition, 39(3), 541–563.Google Scholar
  28. Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government & Opposition, 48(2), 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1667–1693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mylonas, H., & Kuo, K. (2017). Nationalism and foreign policy. In C. Thies (Ed.), The Oxford encyclopedia of foreign policy analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pirro, A. L. P., Taggart, P., & van Kessel, S. (2018). The populist politics of Euroscepticism in times of crisis: Comparative conclusions. Politics, 38(3), 378–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodrik, D. (2006). Goodbye Washington consensus, hello Washington confusion? A review of the World Bank’s ‘economic growth in the 1990s: Learning from a decade of reform. Journal of Economic Literature, 44, 973–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodrik, D. (2018). Is populism necessarily bad economics? AEA Papers & Proceedings, 108, 196–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rupnik, J. (2016). Surging illiberalism in the east. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schneider, C. (2019). The responsive union. National Elections and European cooperation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Stavrakakis, Y., & Katsembekis, G. (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: The case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(2), 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Urbinati, N. (2018). Political theory of populism. Annual Review of Political Science forthcoming.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations