Opening hours of polling stations and voter turnout: Evidence from a natural experiment

Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Voter turnout has declined in many countries, raising the question of whether electoral institutions increase voter turnout. We exploit an electoral reform in the Austrian state of Burgenland as a natural experiment to identify the causal effect of polling station opening hours on voter turnout. The results show that a 10% increase in opening hours increased voter turnout by some 0.5 to 0.9 percentage points. The reform also influenced party vote shares. The vote share of the conservative party decreased in the course of the reform, while the vote shares of the other three main parties increased. Conservative voters tend to have an especially strict sense of civic duty and would have participated in the election in any event. Simulations indicate that parliamentary majorities in previous elections would have changed under extended opening hours in favor of the social democratic party. The opening hours of polling stations probably play a more important role in political strategies than recognized to date.

Keywords

Voter turnout Party vote shares Opening hours of polling stations Causal effects Natural experiment Austria 

JEL classifications

D72 D02 Z18 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Editor Axel Dreher, three anonymous referees and Luis Aguiar-Conraria, Felix Arnold, Lutz Arnold, Julie Cullen, Gordon Dahl, Matz Dahlberg, Natalia Danzer, Itzik Fadlon, Andra Filote, Kai Gehring, Benny Geys, Arye Hillman, Andreas Peichl, Helmut Rainer, Mark Schelker, Sebastian Siegloch, Jörg Spenkuch, Heinrich Ursprung, Kaspar Wühtrich, Yue Huang, the participants of the CGDE Workshop 2016 in Magdeburg, the Silvaplana Workshop in Political Economy 2016 in Pontresina, the annual meeting of the Public Choice Society 2017 in New Orleans, the European Public Choice Society 2017 in Budapest, the CESifo Area Conference Public Sector Economics 2017 in Munich, the German Economic Association (VfS) 2017 in Vienna, the Annual Meeting of the Research Group on Public Economics (VfS) in Magdeburg, and seminars at the University of Munich (2016), ifo Institute (2016), University of California, San Diego (2016), Santa Barbara (2016), Irvine (2017), University of Michigan (2016) Northwestern University (2017), University of Marburg (2017), University of Regensburg (2017) for helpful comments, and Lisa Giani-Contini for proof-reading. Kristin Fischer and Constanze Wobar provided excellent research assistance.

Supplementary material

11558_2018_9305_MOESM1_ESM.docx (407 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 407 kb)
11558_2018_9305_MOESM2_ESM.do (42 kb)
ESM 2 (DO 42 kb)
11558_2018_9305_MOESM3_ESM.dta (468 kb)
ESM 3 (DTA 468 kb)
11558_2018_9305_MOESM4_ESM.dta (254 kb)
ESM 4 (DTA 253 kb)
11558_2018_9305_MOESM5_ESM.dta (34 kb)
ESM 5 (DTA 33 kb)
11558_2018_9305_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx (39 kb)
ESM 6 (XLSX 38 kb)
11558_2018_9305_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx (25 kb)
ESM 7 (XLSX 24 kb)
11558_2018_9305_MOESM8_ESM.xlsx (79 kb)
ESM 8 (XLSX 79 kb)
11558_2018_9305_MOESM9_ESM.xlsx (16 kb)
ESM 9 (XLSX 16 kb)

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Autor, D. H., & Lyle, D. (2004). Women, war, and wages: The effect of female labor supply on the wage structure at midcentury. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 497–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altonji, J., Elder, T., & Taber, C. R. (2005). Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of catholic schools. Journal of Political Economy, 113, 151–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, F., & Freier, R. (2016). Only conservatives are voting in the rain: Evidence from German local and state elections. Electoral Studies, 41, 216–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Artés, J. (2014). The rain in Spain. Turnout and partisan voting in Spanish elections. European Journal of Political Economy, 34, 126–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bechtel, M. M., Hangartner, D., & Schmid, L. (2016). Does compulsory voting increase support for leftist policy? American Journal of Political Science, 60, 752–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bechtel, M. M., Hangartner, D., & Schmid, L. (2017). Compulsory voting, habit formation, and political participation. Review of Economics and Statistics.  https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00701.
  7. Bechtel, M. M., & Schmid, L. (2016). Direct democracy, postal voting, and the composition of turnout, mimeo.Google Scholar
  8. Besley, T., & Case, A. (2003). Political institutions and policy choices: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 7–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhatti, Y. (2012). Distance and voting: Evidence from Danish municipalities. Scandinavian Political Studies, 35, 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brady, H. E., & McNulty, J. E. (2011). Turning out to vote: The costs of finding and getting to the polling station. American Political Science Review, 105, 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burden, B. C., Canon, D. T., Mayer, K. R., & Moynihan, D. P. (2014). Election laws, mobilization, and turnout: The unanticipated consequences of election reform. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cancela, J., & Geys, B. (2016). Explaining voter turnout: A meta-analysis of national and subnational elections. Electoral Studies, 42, 264–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Card, D. (1992). Using regional variation in wages to measure the effects of the federal minimum wage. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46, 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clemenz, G. (1994). Competition via shopping hours: A case for regulation? Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150, 625–641.Google Scholar
  15. Conley, T. G. (1999). GMM estimation with cross sectional dependence. Journal of Econometrics, 92, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conley, T. G. (2008). Spatial econometrics. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (2nd ed.). Macmillan: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  17. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  18. Dropp, K. A., 2012. Polling place hours and voter turnout, mimeo. Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
  19. Ferwerda, J. (2014). Electoral consequences of declining participation: A natural experiment in Austria. Electoral Studies, 35, 242–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Filzmaier, P., Perlot, F., (2008). Sind Christdemokraten wählbar? Die Volkspartei in Österreich. In: Köhler, T. (ed.). Stromabwärts: in Mäandern zur Mündung, Christdemokratie als kreatives Projekt, Böhlau, Vienna, 19–27.Google Scholar
  21. Finkelstein, A. (2007). The aggregate effects of health insurance: Evidence from the introduction of Medicare. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fowler, A. (2013). Turnout matters: Evidence from compulsory voting in Australia. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fujiwara, T. (2015). Voting technology, political responsiveness, and infant health: Evidence from Brazil. Econometrica, 83, 423–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Funk, P. (2010). Social incentives and voter turnout: Evidence from the Swiss mail ballot system. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8, 1077–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garmann, S. (2017). The effect of a reduction in opening hours of polling stations on turnout. Public Choice, 171, 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gaebler, S., Potrafke, N., & Roesel, F. (2017). Compulsory voting, voter turnout and asymmetrical habit-formation. CESifo Working Paper No. 6794.Google Scholar
  27. Gehring, K., Schneider, S. A. (2018). Towards the greater good? EU commissioners’ nationality and budget allocation in the European Union. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10, 214–39.Google Scholar
  28. Geys, B. (2006). Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research. Electoral Studies, 25, 637–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gibson, J., Kim, B., Stillman, S., & Boe-Gibson, B. (2013). Time to vote? Public Choice, 156, 517–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gomez, B. T., Hansford, T. G., & Krause, G. A. (2007). The republicans should pray for rain: Weather, turnout and voting in U.S. presidential elections. Journal of Politics, 69, 649–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gradus, R. (1996). The economic effects of extending shop opening hours. Journal of Economics, 64, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hansford, T. G., & Gomez, B. T. (2010). Estimating the electoral effects of voter turnout. American Political Science Review, 104, 268–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Highton, B. (1997). Easy registration and voter turnout. Journal of Politics, 59, 565–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hillman, A. L., Metsuyanim, K., & Potrafke, N. (2015). Democracy with group identity. European Journal of Political Economy, 40(B), 274–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hodler, R., Luechinger, S., & Stutzer, A. (2015). The effects of voting costs on the democratic process and public finances. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7, 141–171.Google Scholar
  36. Hoffman, M., Léon, G., & Lombardi, M. (2017). Compulsory voting, turnout, and government spending: Evidence from Austria. Journal of Public Economics, 145, 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Holbein, J. B., & Hillygus, D. S. (2016). Making young voters: The impact of preregistration on youth turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 60, 364–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Huber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, p 221–233.Google Scholar
  39. Hsiang, S. M. (2010). Temperatures and cyclones strongly associated with economic production in the Caribbean and Central America. PNAS, 107, 15367–15372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jaitman, L. (2013). The causal effect of compulsory voting laws on turnout: Does skill matter? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 92, 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Knack, S. (1994). Does rain help the republicans? Theory and evidence on turnout and the vote. Public Choice, 79, 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lind, J. T. (2014). Rainy day politics – An instrumental variables approach to the effect of parties on political outcomes, CESifo Working Paper No. 4911.Google Scholar
  43. Lopez De Leon, F. L., & Rizzi, R. (2014). A test for the rational ignorance hypothesis: Evidence from a natural experiment in Brazil. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6, 380–398.Google Scholar
  44. Luechinger, S., Rosinger, M., & Stutzer, A. (2007). The impact of postal voting on participation: Evidence for Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 13, 167–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oster, E. (2017). Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and validation, Journal of Business Economics and Statistics.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2016.1227711.
  46. Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(K) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 619–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Poutvaara, P., & Wagener, A. (2007). To draft or not to draft? Inefficiency, generational incidence, and political economy of military conscription. European Journal of Political Economy, 23, 975–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rouwendal, J., & Rietveld, P. (1998). An economic analysis of opening hours for shops. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 5, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schelker, M., & Schneiter, M. (2017). The elasticity of voter turnout: Investing 85 cents per voter to increase voter turnout by 4 percent. Electoral Studies, 49, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. SORA and ISA (2013). Analyse Volksbefragung Wehrpflicht 2013, Vienna.Google Scholar
  51. Statistics Canada. (2011). Reasons for not voting in the May 2, 2011 federal election, http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/110705/dq110705a-eng.htm, May 2011 (accessed 12 Jan 2016.
  52. Thum, M., & Weichenrieder, A. (1997). Dinkies’ and housewives: The regulation of shopping hours. Kyklos, 50, 539–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wenzel, T. (2010). Liberalization of opening hours with free entry. German Economic Review, 11, 511–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ifo Institute, Ifo Center for Public Finance and Political EconomyMunichGermany
  2. 2.University of MunichMunichGermany
  3. 3.Ifo Institute, Dresden BranchDresdenGermany
  4. 4.Technische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations