Opening hours of polling stations and voter turnout: Evidence from a natural experiment
- 30 Downloads
Voter turnout has declined in many countries, raising the question of whether electoral institutions increase voter turnout. We exploit an electoral reform in the Austrian state of Burgenland as a natural experiment to identify the causal effect of polling station opening hours on voter turnout. The results show that a 10% increase in opening hours increased voter turnout by some 0.5 to 0.9 percentage points. The reform also influenced party vote shares. The vote share of the conservative party decreased in the course of the reform, while the vote shares of the other three main parties increased. Conservative voters tend to have an especially strict sense of civic duty and would have participated in the election in any event. Simulations indicate that parliamentary majorities in previous elections would have changed under extended opening hours in favor of the social democratic party. The opening hours of polling stations probably play a more important role in political strategies than recognized to date.
KeywordsVoter turnout Party vote shares Opening hours of polling stations Causal effects Natural experiment Austria
JEL classificationsD72 D02 Z18
We thank the Editor Axel Dreher, three anonymous referees and Luis Aguiar-Conraria, Felix Arnold, Lutz Arnold, Julie Cullen, Gordon Dahl, Matz Dahlberg, Natalia Danzer, Itzik Fadlon, Andra Filote, Kai Gehring, Benny Geys, Arye Hillman, Andreas Peichl, Helmut Rainer, Mark Schelker, Sebastian Siegloch, Jörg Spenkuch, Heinrich Ursprung, Kaspar Wühtrich, Yue Huang, the participants of the CGDE Workshop 2016 in Magdeburg, the Silvaplana Workshop in Political Economy 2016 in Pontresina, the annual meeting of the Public Choice Society 2017 in New Orleans, the European Public Choice Society 2017 in Budapest, the CESifo Area Conference Public Sector Economics 2017 in Munich, the German Economic Association (VfS) 2017 in Vienna, the Annual Meeting of the Research Group on Public Economics (VfS) in Magdeburg, and seminars at the University of Munich (2016), ifo Institute (2016), University of California, San Diego (2016), Santa Barbara (2016), Irvine (2017), University of Michigan (2016) Northwestern University (2017), University of Marburg (2017), University of Regensburg (2017) for helpful comments, and Lisa Giani-Contini for proof-reading. Kristin Fischer and Constanze Wobar provided excellent research assistance.
- Bechtel, M. M., Hangartner, D., & Schmid, L. (2017). Compulsory voting, habit formation, and political participation. Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00701.
- Bechtel, M. M., & Schmid, L. (2016). Direct democracy, postal voting, and the composition of turnout, mimeo.Google Scholar
- Clemenz, G. (1994). Competition via shopping hours: A case for regulation? Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150, 625–641.Google Scholar
- Conley, T. G. (2008). Spatial econometrics. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (2nd ed.). Macmillan: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Dropp, K. A., 2012. Polling place hours and voter turnout, mimeo. Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
- Filzmaier, P., Perlot, F., (2008). Sind Christdemokraten wählbar? Die Volkspartei in Österreich. In: Köhler, T. (ed.). Stromabwärts: in Mäandern zur Mündung, Christdemokratie als kreatives Projekt, Böhlau, Vienna, 19–27.Google Scholar
- Gaebler, S., Potrafke, N., & Roesel, F. (2017). Compulsory voting, voter turnout and asymmetrical habit-formation. CESifo Working Paper No. 6794.Google Scholar
- Gehring, K., Schneider, S. A. (2018). Towards the greater good? EU commissioners’ nationality and budget allocation in the European Union. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10, 214–39.Google Scholar
- Hodler, R., Luechinger, S., & Stutzer, A. (2015). The effects of voting costs on the democratic process and public finances. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7, 141–171.Google Scholar
- Huber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, p 221–233.Google Scholar
- Lind, J. T. (2014). Rainy day politics – An instrumental variables approach to the effect of parties on political outcomes, CESifo Working Paper No. 4911.Google Scholar
- Lopez De Leon, F. L., & Rizzi, R. (2014). A test for the rational ignorance hypothesis: Evidence from a natural experiment in Brazil. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6, 380–398.Google Scholar
- Oster, E. (2017). Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and validation, Journal of Business Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2016.1227711.
- SORA and ISA (2013). Analyse Volksbefragung Wehrpflicht 2013, Vienna.Google Scholar
- Statistics Canada. (2011). Reasons for not voting in the May 2, 2011 federal election, http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/110705/dq110705a-eng.htm, May 2011 (accessed 12 Jan 2016.
- Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar