Can human rights conditionality reduce repression? Examining the European Union’s economic agreements
- 427 Downloads
The insertion of human rights commitments into international economic agreements is now a widespread practice. We argue that the effect of such commitments depends on the degree of leverage held by one partner over the other. In a comprehensive analysis of the European Union’s (EU’s) relations with developing countries, we find that human rights clauses are conditionally effective; they are associated with improved political freedom and physical integrity rights only in countries that are more heavily dependent on EU aid. An in-depth look at the EU’s enforcement of its human rights clause in the African-Caribbean-Pacific (ACP) group reveals that the Union most often responds to violations of political rights—particularly coups and flawed elections—and that enforcement is indeed a more powerful catalyst for change in highly aid-dependent states. Alternative explanations—that the impact of the human rights clause depends on legalization, the country’s strategic importance, NGO activity, or domestic institutions—find little support.
KeywordsHuman rights European Union Foreign aid International law
- Andersen, Robert. 2004. Regression models for ordinal data. In Michael S. Lewis-Beck, Alan Bryman, and Tim Futing Liao (eds.) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods: Volume 3. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 941-942.Google Scholar
- Arts, K. (2000). Integrating human rights into development cooperation: The case of the Lomé Convention. Cambridge: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
- Balfour, R. (2006). Principles of democracy and human rights. In S. Lucarelli & I. Manners (Eds.), Values and principles in European Union foreign policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bonaglia, F., Goldstein, A., & Petito, F. (2006). Values in European Union development and cooperation policy. In S. Lucarelli & I. Manners (Eds.), Values and principles in European Union foreign policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bradley, A. (2005). An ACP perspective and overview of article 96 cases. The European Centre for Development Policy Management, August. http://ecdpm.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/DP-64D-ACP-Perspective-Overview-Article96-Cases-2005.pdf.
- Checkel, J. T. (2005). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization, 59(Fall), 801–826.Google Scholar
- Cingranelli, D. L., & Richards, D. L. (2008). The Cingranelli-Richards Human Rights Dataset Version, 2008.03.12 http://www.humanrightsdata.org.
- Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Lindberg, S. I., Skaaning, S.-E., Teorell, J., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Fish, M. S., Glynn, A., Hicken, A., Knutsen, C. H., Marquardt, K. L., McMann, K., Miri, F., Paxton, P., Pemstein, D., Staton, J., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y.-t., & Zimmerman, B. (2015). V-Dem [country-year/country-date] dataset v5. Varieties of democracy (V-Dem) project.Google Scholar
- Cuyckens, H. (2010). Human rights clauses in agreements between the community and third countries: The case of the Cotonou agreement. Working Paper, March. https://www.law.kuleuven.be/iir/nl/onderzoek/wp/WP147e.pdf.
- Dai, X. (2005). Why comply? The domestic constituency mechanism. International Organization, 59(Spring), 363–398.Google Scholar
- Davenport, C. (2010). State repression and the domestic democratic Peace. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Del Biondo, K. (2011). EU aid conditionality in ACP countries: Explaining inconsistency in EU sanctions practice. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 7(3), 380–395.Google Scholar
- European Council. (2015). Article 96 of the Cotonou Agreement–Consultation Procedure. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-africa/article-96-cotonou-agreement/. Accessed June 2015.
- Fariss, C. J. (forthcoming). The changing standard of accountability and the positive relationship between human rights treaty ratification and compliance. British Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
- Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2011). Human Rights in German Development Policy. BMZ Strategy Paper 4.Google Scholar
- Fierro, E. (2003). The EU’s approach to human rights conditionality in practice. New York: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
- Furuoka, F. (2005). Human rights conditionality and aid allocation: Case study of Japanese foreign aid policy. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 4(2), 125–146.Google Scholar
- Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2009). Forced to be good: Why trade agreements boost human rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Hathaway, O. (2003). The cost of commitment. Stanford law Review, 55(5), 1821–1862.Google Scholar
- Hathaway, O. (2005). Between power and principle: An integrated theory of international law. The University of Chicaco law Review, 72(2), 469–536.Google Scholar
- Hazelzet, H. (2005). Suspension of development cooperation: An instrument to promote human rights and democracy? The European Centre for Development Policy Management, August. http://global.wisc.edu/development/resources/clayton-hazelzet.pdf.
- Holland, M. (2002). The European Union and the third world. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- King, G., Zeng, L. (2007). When can history be our guide? The pitfalls of counterfactual inference. International Studies Quarterly, 51(1), 183–210.Google Scholar
- Kreutz, J. (2005). Hard measures by a soft power? Sanctions policy of the European Union 1981–2004. Bonn International Center for Conversion. http://www.bicc.de/uploads/tx_bicctools/paper45.pdf.
- Leonard, M. (2005). Why Europe will run the 21st century. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
- Lupu, Y. (2013a). Best evidence: The role of Information in domestic judicial enforcement of international human rights agreements. International Organization, 67(3), 469–503.Google Scholar
- Lupu, Y. (2013b). The informative power of treaty commitment: Using the spatial model to address selection effects. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 912–925.Google Scholar
- Mackie, J., & Zinke, J. (2005). When agreement breaks down, what next? The Cotonou Agreement’s article 96 consultation procedure. The European Centre for Development Policy Management, August. http://ecdpm.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/DP-64A-Cotonou-Agreements-Article-96-Consultation-Procedure-2005.pdf.
- Mbangu, L. (2005). Recent cases of article 96 consultations. The European Centre for Development Policy Management, August. http://ecdpm.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/DP-64C-Recent-Cases-Article96-Consultations-2005.pdf.
- Miller, V. (2004). The human rights clause in the EU’s external agreements. House of Commons Library, Research Paper 04/33.Google Scholar
- Orbie, J. (2011). Promoting labour standards through trade: Normative power or regulatory state Europe? In R. G. Whitman (Ed.), Normative power Europe: Empirical and theoretical Perspectives (pp. 161–184). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Piron, L.-H. (2005). Integrating human rights into development: A synthesis of donor approaches and experiences. Overseas Development Institute. Available at: https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/4404.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2017.
- Portela, C. (2010). European Union sanctions and foreign policy: When and why do they work? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Portela, C., & Mbangu-Kiala, L. (2007). Political dialogue and human rights in the framework of the Cotonou agreement. Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union, 10 July. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2007/381397/EXPO-AFET_ET(2007)381397_EN.pdf.
- Saltnes, J. D. (2013). The EU’s human rights policy: Unpacking the literature on the EU’s implementation of aid conditionality. ARENA Centre for European Studies, March. http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-publications/workingpapers/working-papers2013/wp2-13.pdf.
- Schnakenberg, K. E., & Fariss, C. J. (2014). Dynamic patterns of human rights practices. Political Science Research and Methods, 2(01), 1–31.Google Scholar
- Schrodt, P. A. (2014). Seven deadly sins of contemporary quantitative political analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 51(2), 287–300.Google Scholar
- Smith, K. E. (1998). The use of political conditionality in the EU's relations with third countries: How effective? European Foreign Affairs Review, 3, 253–274.Google Scholar
- Von Stein, J. (2015). Making Promises, keeping Promises: Democracy, ratification and compliance in international human rights law. British Journal of Political Science forthcoming (published online as FirstView).Google Scholar
- Wu, C.-H. (2013). The evolution of EU-ASEAN relations: Legal framework and policy change. National Taiwan University law Review, 8(2), 329–372.Google Scholar